Thursday, November 14, 2024
Home Blog Page 171

Ascendis: more info on the businesses for sale

Ascendis Health has given further information on the financial information of the businesses that form part of the proposed disposal plan.

As a refresher, Ascendis needs to sort out its balance sheet and emerge on a sustainable footing. The current proposal is to achieve this by disposing of three distinct businesses.

The first is Ascendis Medical, with a net asset value of R289 million and a loss after tax for the six months to December of R259 million. This business is earmarked for disposal to Apex Management Services (one of the holders of debt in Ascendis) for a R550 million base price, with downward adjustments for the backlog of capital expenditure (R200 million) and excess rental incurred of up to R25 million.

The second is Ascendis Pharma, with a net asset value of R117 million and profit after tax for the six months to December 2021 of R22 million. This business is to be disposed of to Pharma-Q (another debt holder in Ascendis) and Imperial Logistics for a total price of R375 million.

The third and final business is Nimue, with a net asset value of R32 million and profit after tax for the six months to December 2021 of R5 million. Nimue is being sold for R102 million to Amka Products.

Further details will be provided in the circular to shareholders, which is expected within 60 calendar days from the date of the first announcement regarding these disposals. That announcement was released on 1 February 2022.

If you plan to work out multiples on the above numbers, remember that profitability is always disclosed with reference to a period of time. To estimate a multiple, interim profit needs to be doubled or you are only taking half the earnings into account. In a perfect world, you would want the numbers for the second half of the previous financial year for these businesses, so that you can work out a “last twelve months” (LTM) multiple by combining the second half of the previous year with the first half of this year.

When working out a premium or discount to net asset value (NAV), remember that NAV is a balance sheet concept and is thus a snapshot of a point in time. You never double this, even when working with an interim financial report.

Sun International looks much brighter

The tourism and hospitality group has released results for the year ended December 2021, signing off on a year that was much better for the industry than 2020. That’s hardly a tough benchmark though, let’s face it.

Perhaps the most important thing about this performance is that the group managed to reduce debt in this period by R541 million, assisted greatly by sustainable cost savings of R650 million that were implemented in a time of great need. R180 million in annual savings was achieved at Sun City alone!

Income from continuing operations increased by 29% to R7.8 billion and headline earnings swung favourably from a loss of R409 million to a profit of R265 million. This means that the group has still lost money over the pandemic period overall. The encouraging news is that the adjusted EBITDA margin in South Africa has improved from 28% in 2019 to 34% in 2021.

The casino operations and alternate gaming businesses make up 80% of group revenue. Sun International claims to have defended or grown market share at most urban casinos, while enjoying a strong rebound in the slots business (which benefits from alcohol trading and the removal of curfews) and record income in the sports and online betting business known as SunBet.

New player acquisitions in SunBet were 88% higher than 2019 and turnover was 66% higher than that year. Due to the significant marketing spend required in SunBet, the division recorded a small adjusted EBITDA loss.

The resorts and hotels division can only dream of a return to pre-Covid levels. Income was up 39% in 2021 vs. 2020 but remains 39% below 2019 levels. This division is still loss-making, with an adjusted EBITDA loss of R56 million in 2021 vs. a loss of R158 million in 2020.

Management’s focus is to keep reducing debt to create capacity for dividends to return over the short to medium term and for “disciplined investment” in the right opportunities. The debt levels are well within lender covenants.

Performance in January and February 2022 has been strong. Gaming income was in line with 2019 and EBITDA was higher. Sun International can only do its best under the circumstances of Covid and other global disruptions.

At yesterday’s closing price of R23.59, Sun International is still 40% lower than where it traded at the beginning of 2020.

STADIO declares a maiden dividend

Tertiary education business STADIO has released results for the year ended December 2021.

The core driver of revenue is student numbers, which increased by 9% to 35,031. Distance learning students are around 84% of the total. In the second semester, distance learning students grew 13% year-on-year and contact learning students decreased by 7%, so it’s not difficult to figure out that the mix of students is changing.

This trend will be accelerated by the Milpark business transitioning away from contact learning to distance learning only. With one of the Milpark students placing first in the SAICA ITC board examinations, the brand seems to be strengthening.

We will have to wait for a post-COVID world before we know the extent to which contact learning will recover.

In an effort to keep the revenue line ticking over, STADIO is growing its short course business and acquired Intelligent Africa in October 2021. This can be a lucrative way to tap into corporate budgets for learning and development.

Thanks to the mix effect of different qualifications and price increases on top of student number growth, revenue was up 18% for the year.

With the fair value adjustment for CA Connect in the prior year of R207 million excluded, EBITDA increased by 23% to R310 million.

This result was impacted by STADIO having entered into an early settlement agreement with the CA Connect shareholders, which led to a dilution in STADIO’s shareholding in Milpark from 87.2% to 68.5%. When all is said and done, that acquisition cost STADIO R258 million and made loads of money for the sellers thanks to a really strong performance in the CA Connect business.

There were also impairments related to changes in strategy around certain properties. STADIO recognised an impairment of R17 million on the leased Milpark campus in Gauteng and an impairment on the STADIO Montana property of R10 million based on a deal to sell the property for R52 million (the carrying value was R62 million). The base year also had substantial impairments (R51 million on intangible assets) so earnings per share isn’t a great tool for comparison of 2021 to 2020 (as is so often the case).

Without any adjustments, headline earnings per share (HEPS) swung from a loss of 8.5 cents the previous year to a profit of 17 cents per share. Core HEPS excludes the impact of non-recurring or non-cash items and increased by 24% to 17.6 cents per share.

To add to the good news, STADIO has declared its first ever dividend in the amount of 4.7 cents per share. This is encouraging considering that the group had substantial capital expenditure needs for projects like STADIO Centurion and STADIO Durbanville.

The balance sheet has R66 million in cash and STADIO has access to a revolving credit facility of R185 million of which only R15 million has been drawn down.

The share price closed 3.3% higher at R3.40. The dividend represents a yield of 1.4% on yesterday’s closing price.

Absa got the basics right in 2021

Banking results season is well underway, with Absa as the latest company to report on the year ended December 2021.

If you thought the swings at group level over the past two years can be significant, wait until you read deeper and see the individual business unit performance. For example, the Vehicle and Asset Finance unit swung from a loss of R927 million in 2020 to a profit of R605 million in 2021!

Gross loans and advances increased 7% and deposits were 12% higher, so the bank has followed a cautious strategy in getting money out the door. Interestingly, credit card loans only increased by 1%! To give context to that, instalment credit grew 9% and mortgages grew 8%.

Linked to the balance sheet strategy, credit impairments fell by 59%, resulting in a credit loss ratio of 0.77%. This is way down from 1.92% in the Covid-infested 2020 financial year.

Revenue increased by 5%, with the growth driven entirely by net interest income increasing 9%. Non-interest income was flat vs. the prior year. Net interest margin improved from 4.17% in 2020 to 4.46% in 2021 as interest rates stabilised.

To give an idea of how sensitive the banks are to interest rate movements, Absa’s net interest income would change by approximately R600 million if interest rates changed by 1%. To be clear, interest rate increases are positive for banks.

Operating expense growth was just 1%, so that’s a feather in Absa’s cap for cost control, although a major contributor was high non-recurring advisory fees in the base. This helped drive an improvement in the cost-to-income ratio from 59% to 56.6%. Further down the income statement, pre-provision operating profit increased by 11%.

Thanks to the improved credit loss ratio, diluted headline earnings per share jumped by 193% and the net asset value (NAV) per share increased by 12% to R156.41. Yesterday’s closing price of R177.45 represents a 13.5% premium to NAV per share.

Absa hopes to improve return on equity to over 17% by 2024. In 2021, return on equity was 14.6%, so there’s a long way to go.

The bank declared dividends of 785 cents per share in 2021, of which the final dividend is 475 cents per share. Based on the full year dividend and yesterday’s closing price, the trailing dividend yield is 4.4%.

EOH achieves 5x EBITDA for Information Services

EOH has announced the disposal of four businesses to a single purchaser. This is part of EOH’s strategy to dispose of certain IP companies in an attempt to fix the group’s balance sheet.

The assets in question are Hoonar Tekwurks Consulting, Managed Integrity Evaluation, Xpert Decisions Systems and Zenaptix, collectively referred to by EOH as “Information Services” and so I’ll stick to that term as well.

The Information Services businesses provide credit checks, background screening and big data, analytics and technology services in South Africa. Each of the four underlying companies has a different speciality within that broader framework.

The purchaser is an entity called Bachique 842 Proprietary Limited. That sounds like a lipstick colour and doesn’t tell you much in isolation. The important additional information is that the company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of LR Africa Holdings Limited, advised by Lightrock.

Among others, Lightrock is backed by the Princely House of Liechtenstein and its portfolio includes more than 60 high-growth companies. Lightrock has 70 professionals based in 5 offices across Europe, Latin America, India and Africa. EOH notes that it sees Lightrock as the right partner for the Information Services businesses going forward and it does seem like there might be an exciting future ahead for those management teams.

The deal has been priced based on an enterprise value of R445 million. The use of enterprise value is the most common technique in these types of deals, as it allows for the assets to be valued without any distortions from debt or excess cash on the balance sheet. Adjustments are then made for the balance sheet to bridge the gap between enterprise value and what the seller actually receives.

In terms of cash to be received by EOH, the base purchase price is R417 million, adjusted for final net debt and working capital benchmarks among others. The proceeds (net of the adjustments and transaction costs) will be used by EOH to reduce debt.

As at 31 July 2021, Information Services had a net asset value of R344 million and a tangible net asset value (i.e. excluding goodwill and other intangible assets) of R135.6 million.

EBITDA for the year ended July 2021 was R138.4 million. Excluding a once-off non-cash gain, EBITDA was R88 million. This was the most likely number used in arriving at the enterprise value of R445 million, so that’s an EV/EBITDA multiple of just over 5x.

The profit after tax for the year ended July 2021 was R79.1 million. Adjusting for the non-cash item mentioned above as well as other major non-cash items results in a “cash” profit after tax of R37.9 million.

There are several conditions precedent, ranging from South African Reserve Bank approval through to consent by the lenders to EOH. Importantly, EOH shareholders also need to approve the transaction as this is a Category 1 deal under JSE Listings Requirements.

EOH needs to achieve more than 50% support from shareholders and will be releasing a circular “in due course” with all the information needed by shareholders to make a decision. It should make for very interesting reading.

Standard Bank: positive JAWS and a strong outlook

Standard Bank is the latest financial institution to release results for the year to December 2021. The trend in the sector has been one of recovery after 2020 was severely impacted by Covid.

The blue bank is no different, with a rebound in headline earnings of 57% to R25 billion. Return on equity jumped sharply from 8.9% to 13.5%, a level that supports a valuation above net asset value (NAV).

Speaking of NAV per share, that increased by 13% to R124.93 per share. Friday’s closing price of R160.33 represents a 28% premium to NAV per share.

Although revenue for the year was only up 5%, there was double-digit growth in the second half of the year. Revenue growth was ahead of cost growth, resulting in positive JAWS (the difference between the two) of 54 basis points.

Further down the income statement, credit impairment charges dropped by 52%, something to be expected after the horrors of 2020. Importantly, they are still higher than pre-pandemic levels.

It’s worth highlighting that Standard Bank Group is the third largest asset manager in Africa. The investment business grew headline earnings by 11% in 2021.

The South African banking business saw headline earnings jump by 172% and return on equity recover to 12.5%. JAWS was 198 basis points in a year of strong revenue recovery.

In other African regions (contributing 36% of group headline earnings), currency movements resulted in a muted performance in reporting currency. Headline earnings declined by 2% as reported and increased 6% in constant currency. Return on Equity at 18.2% is still very impressive.

Prospects for 2022 are encouraging from a banking perspective, with interest rate hikes expected in the markets in which Standard Bank operates. This helps drive endowment income for banks, something that has suffered during an environment of extremely low interest rates during the pandemic.

In South Africa, Standard Bank expects three more 25 basis point increases over the course of the year.

In line with other macroeconomic commentary I’ve seen (as well as common sense), the conflict in Ukraine is a risk to further rate hikes i.e. may result in fewer hikes than the market was expecting. Standard Bank luckily has limited direct exposure to Russia and Ukraine, but ICBC does have exposure to emerging markets and commodities businesses that are being impacted.

Non-interest revenue will be driven by activity-related fees (e.g. loan origination fees) that will hopefully more than offset an expected decrease in trading revenues year-on-year.

With a continued focus on costs, the bank hopes to deliver another positive JAWS result. Credit impairments are expected to normalise, with a credit loss ratio at the lower end of the through-the-cycle range of 70 to 100 basis points.

Shareholders should note that the acquisition of Liberty Holdings minorities was completed recently and Liberty delisted on 1 March. Integrating these businesses will be a priority. Between Liberty and Standard Bank, there is over R1.3 trillion in assets under management and R73 billion in gross written premium across the short-term and long-term businesses.

Headline earnings per share (HEPS) was R15.73 and the dividend per ordinary share is R8.71. This is a trailing yield of 5.4% on Friday’s closing price. The final dividend of R5.11 per share will be paid in April.

Sanlam dishes out dividends

Sanlam has released its results for the year ended December 2021. The base period covers the worst of the pandemic, so keep that in mind when assessing this result. The key takeout from this result is that operating profits have returned to pre-pandemic levels.

I’ll start with the dividend, something that Sanlam prides itself on. If you are an investor who places importance on regular dividends, then Sanlam makes a strong case for being on your shortlist. The company has been an exceptional source of dividends over the years and declared a final dividend of 334 cents per share for this financial year, up from 300 cents per share in 2020.

This is a trailing dividend yield of roughly 5%, which is substantial for a group of Sanlam’s size and resilience.

Delving into the results, we see the net result from financial services up 13% and net operational earnings up 23%. At diluted headline earnings per share (HEPS) level, the increase is 27%.

The core business has put in a solid year, with new business volumes up 14%, net fund inflows 27% higher and value of new covered business significantly higher by 44%. Importantly, new covered business margin has also increased (from 2.58% to 2.87%).

Sanlam’s equity value per share is R64.44, up from R59.20 the year before. The company is trading at a slight discount to book value. Return on group equity value per share was 13.9% in 2021.

Depressingly, Sanlam includes a note in the outlook section regarding an expectation of further waves of infection. Modest discretionary reserves will be maintained in relation to this risk.

Sanlam does not expect the new business growth rates achieved in 2021 to be repeated in 2022. The group also expects equity markets to normalise in 2022 after a major recovery year in 2021, which will also impact growth rates.

The share price jumped nearly 6% in morning trade, as the market showed its appreciation for the consistency of this financial services giant.

Caxton has bounced back strongly

Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers is such an interesting group. The share price has returned over 40% in the past year, although the longer-term picture hasn’t been nearly as pretty. Value investors are drawn to this stock because it offers a discounted entry point into some solid assets.

Caxton operates in the publishing, advertising, packaging and printing industries. This isn’t an easy space to play in, but a leading business in the industry can be a good investment despite the numerous headwinds. Weaker businesses tend to exit these industries, leaving only the strongest to generate economic profits.

Caxton notes that it has achieved a “full recovery from the impact of the pandemic” – something that not many businesses can say yet!

In the six months to December 2021, Caxton posted revenue growth of 12.3%. Advertising spend has recovered, particularly driven by retailers advertising in the local newspapers. The packaging business was a happy beneficiary of a recovery in the alcohol and quick service restaurant markets. Overall, things are normalising from a demand perspective.

It hasn’t all been easy of course. Supply chains have been tough and there were shortages of paper and packaging board raw material across different grades. Caxton had previously decided to hold excess stock, which turned out to be critical in mitigating the impact of price increases. Stock was R340 million higher than in the prior period, which has a negative impact on working capital metrics. You win on some metrics and lose on others in this game.

The group has noted that the full impact of the pricing pressures will be felt in the second half of the year. Inflationary pressures are evident across the cost base, with staff costs up 8.7% and operating expenses up 9.2%. The staff cost growth is higher than under normal circumstances, as the base included once-off reductions as part of the pandemic mitigation. Other operating expenses have been driven by increased demand and higher energy costs, with the latter a concern for all industrial businesses.

Operating profit jumped 36% and the growth looks even better after taking depreciation and amortisation into account, up 67.7%.

Below that, we find an accounting line that has distorted the growth in net profit. In the prior period, there was a non-recurring profit on disposal of an associate of around R305 million after tax. This contributed 80.7 cents in earnings per share in the prior period out of a group total of 108.5 cents.

It’s therefore impressive that earnings per share has come in at 63.9 cents this year, reflecting growth of 130% when adjusting for that disposal.

On a headline earnings per share (HEPS) basis, earnings are up by 80.8%.

Value investors look at the net asset value (NAV) per share as an indicator of growth and the level of discount in the share price. It’s not a perfect measure by any means, but a 24.2% increase in NAV per share is impressive. It now sits at R18.37 per share, so the share price at nearly R9.50 is a substantial discount to that number.

There’s a very important comment towards the bottom of the announcement regarding Caxton’s stake in Mpact. Caxton notes that this investment will “enjoy ongoing management and board attention” as they consider “future steps towards greater control of this business” – that is highly relevant for shareholders in both Caxton and Mpact.

This is no secret, as Caxton has previously approached the Competition Commission regarding its intention to increase the current shareholding in Mpact from around 32%. If the stake goes above 35%, a mandatory offer would be triggered.

The share price traded 4% higher during the morning, as the market digested the result and liked it.

Nedbank delivered a strong recovery in 2021

Nedbank has released results for the year ended December 2021. Naturally, this was a much happier year for Nedbank than the year before.

The commodity cycle pulled our economy through a tough time, which has knock-on benefits for the big banks. There’s no escaping it – their fortunes are largely dependent on South Africa’s overall prospects. Nedbank has a particularly important property division, so that exposure would’ve felt a lot more comfortable in 2021 than in 2020.

Interestingly, demand for corporate credit picked up in the second half of the year. Companies peaked their heads out and started borrowing again, after individual borrowers kept the banks busy for the first half of the year.

Headline earnings in 2021 jumped 115% to R11.7 billion thanks to the extremely weak base year. The critical point is that headline earnings is 7% lower than 2019 levels, so we aren’t out of the woods yet. From a balance sheet perspective, the bank is stronger than pre-Covid levels on important metrics like common equity tier 1.

The improvement was driven by lower impairments, better margins and tight cost management. The investment in ETI in Africa also performed better in this period. The credit loss ratio of 83bps is within the through-the-cycle target of 60 – 100bps. Performance has also been supported by significant expense savings through improvements in technology.

Other important measures include growth in operating profit of 9%, a positive JAWS performance of 0.8% (the difference between income growth and expenses growth), an 11% increase in net asset value per share and an improvement in return on equity to 12.5%.

With an expectation of just 1.7% GDP growth in 2022, the easy part of the recovery is behind us. The bank will focus on increasing return on equity to over 15% and decreasing the cost-to-income ratio to below 54%.

For now, shareholders can hang their hats on 2021 HEPS of 2,410 cents and a full year dividend of 1,191 cents, of which 758 cents has been declared as the final dividend.

The net asset value is 20,493 cents, so the bank is now trading at a 5% premium to its book value. This is the reward given by the market when a bank generates attractive return on equity.

Transaction Capital continues to impress

Ahead of its AGM today, the company released a detailed update on its operations, including commentary on the financial performance in the first four months of the 2022 financial year.

By all accounts, the growth looks good. The group is expecting a “steady recovery” in SA Taxi and “high-growth earnings” from WeBuyCars and Transaction Capital Risk Services (TCRS). The latter two divisions bring the opportunity for international expansion.

The announcement discusses WeBuyCars first, a strong indication of where the group has been focusing its attention. Without doubt, this acquisition injected some serious octane into the share price.

The company points out the trend in South Africa of a growing number of first-time car buyers. This ties in with a general improvement in the LSM curve, as the middle class grows in our country. When you look through the noise and focus on the data, there are good news stories in South Africa.

WeBuyCars is selling almost 10,000 vehicles per month and is starting to move into smaller cities. To give an idea of the flexibility of the model, the enormous operation at the Dome has 1,400 bays and the Polokwane dealership has 175 bays. The company is also rolling out “buying pods” located in high traffic areas like shopping centres.

Approximately 30% of vehicle sales are online. Sales to consumers (rather than other dealerships) represented 16% of total online sales, which I interpret to mean 4.8% of group sales. That contribution has doubled in the past year.

Selling finance and insurance (F&I) products is key in this industry. WeBuyCars is placing significant focus on this, with 17% of all sales now including F&I. Transaction Capital knows how to run a credit business (thanks to SA Taxi), so I’m not surprised to see them offering vehicle finance as a principal i.e. on its own balance sheet.

Speaking of SA Taxi, the business has faced considerable challenges in the pandemic. People travelled less, with the negative impact on taxi utilisation hurting the operators and thus SA Taxi’s business.

With inflation in new taxi prices and major spikes in fuel costs, there are still pressures. Minibus taxi fares have increased by an average of around 9.3% per year since 2013, which provides great insight into the struggles of lower-income earnings in South Africa.

The recovery in this business is taking longer than expected, but Transaction Capital is focusing on quality renewed taxis (40% of loans originated) and other initiatives like the insurance business (SA Taxi Protect).

In TCRS, the business benefits from pressure on consumers. If there are efficient debt collection processes in place, then clients are more willing to extend credit. When done in a controlled manner, this is a critical source of grease for the wheels of the economy.

TCRS acquires portfolios of non-performing loans (NPLs) and there are more of those running around when times are tough.

I am a very happy shareholder in Transaction Capital. It is one of the very few companies that I will never sell. With substantial growth prospects, a proven track record in capital allocation and a particular knack for building clever vertically integrated businesses, I look forward to the release of interim results in May.

Disclaimer: the author holds shares in Transaction Capital

Verified by MonsterInsights