Wednesday, November 20, 2024
Home Blog Page 173

Caxton has bounced back strongly

Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers is such an interesting group. The share price has returned over 40% in the past year, although the longer-term picture hasn’t been nearly as pretty. Value investors are drawn to this stock because it offers a discounted entry point into some solid assets.

Caxton operates in the publishing, advertising, packaging and printing industries. This isn’t an easy space to play in, but a leading business in the industry can be a good investment despite the numerous headwinds. Weaker businesses tend to exit these industries, leaving only the strongest to generate economic profits.

Caxton notes that it has achieved a “full recovery from the impact of the pandemic” – something that not many businesses can say yet!

In the six months to December 2021, Caxton posted revenue growth of 12.3%. Advertising spend has recovered, particularly driven by retailers advertising in the local newspapers. The packaging business was a happy beneficiary of a recovery in the alcohol and quick service restaurant markets. Overall, things are normalising from a demand perspective.

It hasn’t all been easy of course. Supply chains have been tough and there were shortages of paper and packaging board raw material across different grades. Caxton had previously decided to hold excess stock, which turned out to be critical in mitigating the impact of price increases. Stock was R340 million higher than in the prior period, which has a negative impact on working capital metrics. You win on some metrics and lose on others in this game.

The group has noted that the full impact of the pricing pressures will be felt in the second half of the year. Inflationary pressures are evident across the cost base, with staff costs up 8.7% and operating expenses up 9.2%. The staff cost growth is higher than under normal circumstances, as the base included once-off reductions as part of the pandemic mitigation. Other operating expenses have been driven by increased demand and higher energy costs, with the latter a concern for all industrial businesses.

Operating profit jumped 36% and the growth looks even better after taking depreciation and amortisation into account, up 67.7%.

Below that, we find an accounting line that has distorted the growth in net profit. In the prior period, there was a non-recurring profit on disposal of an associate of around R305 million after tax. This contributed 80.7 cents in earnings per share in the prior period out of a group total of 108.5 cents.

It’s therefore impressive that earnings per share has come in at 63.9 cents this year, reflecting growth of 130% when adjusting for that disposal.

On a headline earnings per share (HEPS) basis, earnings are up by 80.8%.

Value investors look at the net asset value (NAV) per share as an indicator of growth and the level of discount in the share price. It’s not a perfect measure by any means, but a 24.2% increase in NAV per share is impressive. It now sits at R18.37 per share, so the share price at nearly R9.50 is a substantial discount to that number.

There’s a very important comment towards the bottom of the announcement regarding Caxton’s stake in Mpact. Caxton notes that this investment will “enjoy ongoing management and board attention” as they consider “future steps towards greater control of this business” – that is highly relevant for shareholders in both Caxton and Mpact.

This is no secret, as Caxton has previously approached the Competition Commission regarding its intention to increase the current shareholding in Mpact from around 32%. If the stake goes above 35%, a mandatory offer would be triggered.

The share price traded 4% higher during the morning, as the market digested the result and liked it.

Nedbank delivered a strong recovery in 2021

Nedbank has released results for the year ended December 2021. Naturally, this was a much happier year for Nedbank than the year before.

The commodity cycle pulled our economy through a tough time, which has knock-on benefits for the big banks. There’s no escaping it – their fortunes are largely dependent on South Africa’s overall prospects. Nedbank has a particularly important property division, so that exposure would’ve felt a lot more comfortable in 2021 than in 2020.

Interestingly, demand for corporate credit picked up in the second half of the year. Companies peaked their heads out and started borrowing again, after individual borrowers kept the banks busy for the first half of the year.

Headline earnings in 2021 jumped 115% to R11.7 billion thanks to the extremely weak base year. The critical point is that headline earnings is 7% lower than 2019 levels, so we aren’t out of the woods yet. From a balance sheet perspective, the bank is stronger than pre-Covid levels on important metrics like common equity tier 1.

The improvement was driven by lower impairments, better margins and tight cost management. The investment in ETI in Africa also performed better in this period. The credit loss ratio of 83bps is within the through-the-cycle target of 60 – 100bps. Performance has also been supported by significant expense savings through improvements in technology.

Other important measures include growth in operating profit of 9%, a positive JAWS performance of 0.8% (the difference between income growth and expenses growth), an 11% increase in net asset value per share and an improvement in return on equity to 12.5%.

With an expectation of just 1.7% GDP growth in 2022, the easy part of the recovery is behind us. The bank will focus on increasing return on equity to over 15% and decreasing the cost-to-income ratio to below 54%.

For now, shareholders can hang their hats on 2021 HEPS of 2,410 cents and a full year dividend of 1,191 cents, of which 758 cents has been declared as the final dividend.

The net asset value is 20,493 cents, so the bank is now trading at a 5% premium to its book value. This is the reward given by the market when a bank generates attractive return on equity.

Transaction Capital continues to impress

Ahead of its AGM today, the company released a detailed update on its operations, including commentary on the financial performance in the first four months of the 2022 financial year.

By all accounts, the growth looks good. The group is expecting a “steady recovery” in SA Taxi and “high-growth earnings” from WeBuyCars and Transaction Capital Risk Services (TCRS). The latter two divisions bring the opportunity for international expansion.

The announcement discusses WeBuyCars first, a strong indication of where the group has been focusing its attention. Without doubt, this acquisition injected some serious octane into the share price.

The company points out the trend in South Africa of a growing number of first-time car buyers. This ties in with a general improvement in the LSM curve, as the middle class grows in our country. When you look through the noise and focus on the data, there are good news stories in South Africa.

WeBuyCars is selling almost 10,000 vehicles per month and is starting to move into smaller cities. To give an idea of the flexibility of the model, the enormous operation at the Dome has 1,400 bays and the Polokwane dealership has 175 bays. The company is also rolling out “buying pods” located in high traffic areas like shopping centres.

Approximately 30% of vehicle sales are online. Sales to consumers (rather than other dealerships) represented 16% of total online sales, which I interpret to mean 4.8% of group sales. That contribution has doubled in the past year.

Selling finance and insurance (F&I) products is key in this industry. WeBuyCars is placing significant focus on this, with 17% of all sales now including F&I. Transaction Capital knows how to run a credit business (thanks to SA Taxi), so I’m not surprised to see them offering vehicle finance as a principal i.e. on its own balance sheet.

Speaking of SA Taxi, the business has faced considerable challenges in the pandemic. People travelled less, with the negative impact on taxi utilisation hurting the operators and thus SA Taxi’s business.

With inflation in new taxi prices and major spikes in fuel costs, there are still pressures. Minibus taxi fares have increased by an average of around 9.3% per year since 2013, which provides great insight into the struggles of lower-income earnings in South Africa.

The recovery in this business is taking longer than expected, but Transaction Capital is focusing on quality renewed taxis (40% of loans originated) and other initiatives like the insurance business (SA Taxi Protect).

In TCRS, the business benefits from pressure on consumers. If there are efficient debt collection processes in place, then clients are more willing to extend credit. When done in a controlled manner, this is a critical source of grease for the wheels of the economy.

TCRS acquires portfolios of non-performing loans (NPLs) and there are more of those running around when times are tough.

I am a very happy shareholder in Transaction Capital. It is one of the very few companies that I will never sell. With substantial growth prospects, a proven track record in capital allocation and a particular knack for building clever vertically integrated businesses, I look forward to the release of interim results in May.

Disclaimer: the author holds shares in Transaction Capital

MTN: Y’ello Summer, Y’ello Dividends

The Y’ello Summer campaign was run several years ago, before MTN had to say Y’ello Regulators instead and deal with all kinds of issues in countries like Nigeria. It’s been a tough time for long-term shareholders. Those who bought recently are smiling all the way.

The yellow telecommunications giant has put in a share price performance in the past year that is far more inspiring than its new logo. I haven’t seen many people on Twitter gushing over the new corporate identity.

Like so many other sectors and businesses, the core services upon which MTN was built are now ex-growth i.e. mature. The group has to deliver growth through new offerings into the substantial customer base across Africa.

In the year ended December 2021, MTN’s service revenue only grew by 1%. The group is focusing on “digital solutions” and that is coming through in the numbers, with data revenue up 16% and fintech revenue up 17.4%.

Subscribers grew by just 2.9 million, heavily impacted by new SIM registration regulations in Nigeria. Excluding Nigeria, subscribers grew by 11 million.

Mobile Money customers increased by 22.6% in 2021 to 56.8 million. The value of transactions grew 56.8% to USD239.4 billion, which means each customer is pushing more money through the platform than in the year before.

EBITDA grew by 5.3% and EBITDA margin continued to expand, this time by 170bps to 44.5%. This helped drive an increase in HEPS of 31.8%.

Net debt in the holding company has dropped to R30.1 billion from R43.3 billion, which does wonders for expansion in the equity value. A return on equity improvement of 260bps to 19.6% does wonders for shareholder happiness.

The focus in MTN has been on deleveraging the balance sheet, with substantial progress made in that regard. In-country listings in Africa have been successful, which in my opinion de-risks the operations in countries like Nigeria where there is now much higher local ownership.

The improvements in the business are captured by the declaration of a dividend of 300 cents per share. MTN expects to pay a minimum ordinary final dividend of 330 cents per share in FY22, so there’s an expectation of 10% growth in the dividend.

The capital expenditure burden is expected to decrease over the medium-term, which will help in unlocking cash flows. Ongoing growth in fintech and other services will help drive EBITDA margin. MTN is making great progress on delivering its “Ambition 2025” strategy and the share price reflects that, having increased by a colossal 158% in the past year.

The share price is nearly back to where it was in 2015, a time before the model fell apart as MTN dealt with huge challenges in Africa and a dicey balance sheet. At this stage, the future for MTN appears to be as bright as the logo.

The big question for investors is simple: to what extent is that future already reflected in the share price?

Royal Bafokeng Platinum: record production when it counted

Royal Bafokeng Platinum (RB Plats) has released annual results for the year ended December 2021. This has been a wonderful period for the platinum group metal (PGM) players, who deserved a break after years of pain.

Market cycles are incredible things. To give an idea of how severe the swings can be, RB Plats’ return on capital employed in 2014 – 2017 ranged from -29.4% to +3.3%. In 2020 it was 17.7% and in 2021 it increased to 22.4%!

As a reminder, Impala Platinum (Implats) has made an offer for RB Plats. The latter’s independent board has recommended the Implats offer to shareholders, with the caution that there is still a chance of another offer being made. The Takeover Regulation Panel (TRP) is still investigating whether Northam Platinum (which bought out Royal Bafokeng Holdings) should also be required to make a mandatory offer.

Shareholders in RB Plats will hopefully obtain clarity on this soon.

The Implats offer is R90 cash and 0.3 Implats shares per RB Plats share, so the RB Plats share price will fluctuate based on the Implats share price and the possibility of an offer from Northam Platinum.

In 2021, RB Plats grew revenue by 22.8%. This was assisted greatly by record production: 12.1% growth in tonnes hoisted, 16% growth in tonnes milled and 11.5% growth in 4E metals in concentrate.

Cash operating costs per tonne or per ounce (as appropriate) increased by single digits, well below the revenue growth rate. This led to a 28.3% increase in EBITDA to over R8.5 billion, an EBITDA margin of 51.9% (up from 49.7% the prior year).

The percentage increase was even higher at net profit level, with headline earnings per share (HEPS) up by 71.6%.

After capital expenditure of R1.8 billion in 2021 that was almost identical to 2020’s level, there’s lots of free cash flow to go around. This drove a massive jump in the dividend of 86.1% to R10.70 per share.

Please note that the final dividend was R5.35 per share, so investors who come onto the register this month will only receive that amount and not the R10.70 per share.

All eyes are on the TRP and a final answer on whether Northam Platinum needs to make an offer.

Shoprite: priced for perfection and delivering it

Shoprite has released results for the 26 weeks to 2nd January 2022.

The company has been on a charge, positioning itself as the darling of the grocery sector. That certainly wasn’t the case just a few years ago, so I will use this opportunity to remind you of how quickly things can change in the market.

Shoprite is flying in the South African market, posting huge growth of 11.3% in the supermarkets business (which contributes 79.5% of group sales). This is despite two of the Checkers Hyper stores being closed since July’s civil unrest.

There’s a base effect in this number, as LiquorShop (7.4% of the segment) increased sales by a whopping 49.8% thanks to fewer alcohol restrictions. Checkers and Checkers Hyper contributed 40% of segmental sales and grew by 11.4%, an impressive result reflecting ongoing market share gains among higher-LSM shoppers. Shoprite and Usave (52.5% of the segment) increased sales by a respectable 7.3%, demonstrating the group’s continued relevance among lower-LSM shoppers. The group disclosed 12.1% growth for Usave specifically, so there is double-digit growth being achieved at the top and bottom of the LSM curve.

These numbers were achieved with just 2.6% selling price inflation, so the supermarkets are pushing serious volumes through the door. New stores are also being rolled out, with a net 62 stores opened during the six months, creating 1,949 new jobs.

There are 23.1 million Shoprite and Checkers Xtra Savings Reward Programme members. Just let that number (and the associated data) sink in…

Although no disclosure is given of growth in Checkers Sixty60, they do describe it as being “very successful” and my anecdotal experience of the service supports that. The group has a deal with RTT Group to establish a new company for the on-demand logistics business, cementing the underlying operations in that channel.

The group is also experimenting with new store formats, opening twelve PetShop Science and one Little Me stand-alone baby store. I’m watching that with interest, as there’s a huge profit pool in baby clothes and products (I experienced that first-hand in the past two years!)

Beyond the Supermarkets RSA segment, the story is solid in Rest of Africa (sales growth of 8.4%) and in the Other Operating Segments (up 8.9%), but the Furniture segment has had a tough time with sales down 6.5%. This was attributed to the civil unrest and a high base during which people were stuck at home and buying new furniture.

Gross margin was consistent in the group at 24.1%, with expansion in Supermarkets RSA and a minor contraction in Supermarkets non-RSA. Checkers and Checkers Hyper are higher margin businesses, so outsized growth in those formats would improve the margin mix.

At group level, continuing operations recorded revenue growth of 10%, trading profit growth of 14.5% and headline earnings per share (HEPS) growth of 25.5%. The discontinued operations are in Kenya, Uganda and Madagascar.

The dividend is up 22%, nearly matching the increase in HEPS. The interim dividend is 233 cents per share, just over 1% of yesterday’s closing price. Notably, R854 million was invested in share buybacks in the past year.

Return in invested capital increased from 11.3% to 13.3%. The debt/equity ratio decreased from 27.9% to 22.9% as the group pumped cash through the system (R6.7 billion of it in the form of cash generated from operations).

The share price is up over 9% this year and more than 60% in the past 12 months. Shoprite is trading on a lofty price/earnings multiple as the market has piled into this stock. It is priced for perfection and seems to be delivering it.

Sibanye: unions striking while the cycle is hot

Just when you thought the mining industry was finally looking attractive, the unions have gotten involved. There have been noises in the market for a while now about potential labour action at Sibanye-Stillwater, as negotiations have been underway since November 2021.

This has now been confirmed through a notice sent to the company by the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) and the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) of protected strike action from the evening of 9th March.

This will target the South African gold operations, just as the gold price is performing well in response to inflation and a flight to safety of global capital. The timing couldn’t be worse.

Sibanye’s final offer was for Category 4 – 8 employees to receive increases of 6% in year 1, 5.7% in year 2 and 5.4% in year 3. This works out to an increase in each year of R800 per month. The offer for Miners, Artisans and Officials is 5% in each of the next three years.

To understand why this is important for Sibanye, consider that the cost of labour comprises 49% of operating costs in the gold operations. You may be interested to learn that electricity contributes 20%, so pressure on the system from Eskom has a direct impact on everyone.

The company has not backed down here. There is a web page dedicated to the gold wage negotiations, in which Sibanye has run a campaign around a central message of “know the facts” – aimed at the unionised workers.

At this stage, the fact is that labour action has come to the fore and the risk of it spreading across the industry is significant in my view. Workers are under pressure from cost increases, with shocking jumps in soft commodities and energy prices due to the Ukraine invasion bringing far more troubles on the horizon.

If there isn’t a speedy resolution to that crisis, inflationary pressures on lower income groups will be immense. That isn’t good news for Sibanye or any of the other companies operating in South Africa (and elsewhere).

The gold operations in South Africa represent a relatively small part of Sibanye’s business. We will have to wait and see who blinks first.

AVI faces a tricky year ahead

Consumer goods specialist AVI has released results for the six months to December 2021. The company has struggled to find revenue growth in the past few years, relying instead on cost control and efficiencies to drive growth in headline earnings per share (HEPS).

The latest period is no different, with just 2.3% in revenue growth and a 2.5% decline in selling and administrative costs. The net result in a 6.7% increase in operating profit and a 7.1% increase in cash from operations, with the difference mainly attributable to movements in non-cash items. Notably, R103.3 million was paid out under the I&J Black Staff Scheme.

AVI achieved a 6.6% increase in HEPS. Almost in line with HEPS, the dividend per share has increased by 6.3% to 170 cents.

The failed deal with Mondelez for Snackworks was a costly affair, with expenses of R20 million incurred along the way. To put that into perspective, the civil unrest only resulted in R36.9 million in direct costs across Snackworks and Spitz.

At segmental level, Food and Beverage brands grew revenue 3.8% and operating profit by 4.8%, with the margin expansion driven by cost control. In Fashion Brands, revenue fell 2.9% but operating profit jumped by 14.4% thanks to considerable margin expansion in Footwear & Apparel.

Tea fans will find it interesting that the rooibos business suffered reduced selling prices, which negatively impacted revenue. Black tea revenue increased, as price increases more than offset the lower volumes in this period vs. the lockdown period where people were at home a lot more.

It wouldn’t be right to talk about tea and not coffee. In the latter, the Ciro out-of-home coffee business improved but is still not at historical levels. Customers include hospitality, leisure and corporate entities.

In Snackworks, biscuit revenue increased 7.3% (including volume growth of 1.3%) and snacks revenue increased 4.5% despite a drop in volumes.

I&J reported revenue growth of just 0.8%. Operating profit margin increased from 10.2% to 12.9%, with a favourable product mix and increased volumes in the abalone business.

I’ll touch on one more underlying business unit: Footwear and Apparel. Revenue fell just 1.1% despite an 11.5% drop in footwear volumes, which gives you a taste of inflation in this category. The volumes were hit by the civil unrest and other supply chain challenges.

AVI is in for a tough year unless the conflict in Ukraine is resolved quickly. Commodity prices are going through the roof, which is a major inflationary concern for the food businesses in AVI. Consumers will be under considerable pressure, which isn’t good news when trying to sell them biscuits (or upmarket shoes, for that matter).

Managing volumes, selling prices and ultimately gross margins will be the difference between success and failure this year. That’s no different to any other year; it’s just going to be much harder than usual in 2022.

Massmart can’t stop the bleeding

Massmart has been releasing ugly announcements for so long that I’ve run out of puns. I’ve used Messmart quite often, along with references to the pink elephant in the room (Game). Their financial troubles have outlasted my creativity.

It’s hard to find positives in the story. One silver lining is that Massmart is the second largest retail website traffic generator in South Africa, so the group has made an effort to compete with Takealot. Massmart believes it has an opportunity to become the business-to-business and business-to-consumer omnichannel market leader.

Opportunities are great, but execution is what matters.

To be fair to Massmart, the riots were particularly terrible for the group in 2021. We all remember the shocking scenes on TV of the Game warehouse being looted. It says something for Game’s perception in the investment community that friends of mine joked that Game might be better off on a net basis from getting the insurance payout, since it may have struggled to sell the stock. People are incredibly bearish on Game’s prospects.

Total group sales decreased by 1.9% in 2021, with comparable store sales up 1.7%. This means that the store footprint decreased overall, as the group rationalised its operations and tried to steady the ship.

This needs to be viewed against the “other income” line which includes insurance proceeds related to the riot. This line increased by 280.9% to R1.1 billion. Group sales were R84.9 billion, so this would add another 1.3% to the sales line. It’s definitely not enough to make up for the real issues in the business.

Massmart Wholesale (mainly Makro) could only grow sales by 1.1%. Builders was the star with 7.1% growth. Unsurprisingly, Game was a disaster with sales down 8.7%. Game has 146 stores and 114 of them were updated into “Stores of Excellence” during the year – you can make up your own mind on how excellent they are.

It’s very difficult to manage gross margin when sales are under pressure, so the impact was amplified by a 191bps deterioration to 18.5%. A large part of this was driven by inventory write-downs in the riots, so the more sustainable view is a drop of 45bps to 19.9%. That’s still a rough result.

There’s some good news further down the income statement, with expenses down by 1.2%. It’s just nowhere near enough unfortunately, with trading profit down a whopping 83.3% to R195.4 million.

Below that line, there’s an impairment of over R1 billion, of which nearly R231 million is linked to the civil unrest and R507 million is linked to Game, which must be a swearword at Walmart by now. To add further insult to injury, there’s a foreign exchange loss of R178.5 million.

Here’s the much bigger problem: net interest expenses increased by 2.3% to R1.78 billion. That’s over 9x higher than trading profit, taking the net loss to an eye-watering R2.2 billion. This is largely due to lease expenses (and the crazy accounting of IFRS 16), so I must point out that interest-bearing borrowings (the type of debt that isn’t distorted by accounting rules) are “only” R6.5 billion.

Massmart’s headline loss increased from an already-terrible R924 million to a truly spectacular R1.5 billion.

If you’re wondering how things might look going forward, take note that liquor sales were prohibited for 110 days in this financial year, leading to lost sales of R1.8 billion and lost margin of R193 million. That would’ve nearly doubled trading profit, but wouldn’t have come close to achieving a net profit overall.

Other Covid-related costs came to R77.7 million. The TERS scheme and negotiated rental relief came to R62.2 million. This means that health and safety costs of the virus were largely passed on to government and landlords.

The store closures due to the unrest led to lost sales of R2.7 billion, with lost margin of R473 million.

Provided the deal goes ahead to sell Cambridge, Rhino and Massfresh to Shoprite (and I still have no idea why Shoprite is buying them), punters can look at continuing operations for a clue of what the performance might look like going forward. Those sales increased by 0.1%, so the story is hardly any better.

Capital expenditure in 2021 was nearly R1.4 billion. This is another challenge – retailers need to keep investing to stay relevant with consumers. When they are in deep trouble, trying to turn things around is extremely difficult.

Sales in the eight weeks to 20 February 2022 are up 1.7%, with comparable store sales up 5.1%. In continuing operations, those numbers are 3.6% and 6.6% respectively. That’s at least starting to sound respectable.

In a surprise to absolutely no one, there is no final dividend.

I continue to wonder how much patience Walmart will continue to have with Massmart. The share price is down nearly 27% this year.

Mpact packs a punch

Mpact is a solid JSE mid-cap that just gets on with it. The management team has been there for a long time and they’ve had to deal with all the usual challenges of operating in our beautiful country. Over the past year, the share price is up over 50%.

The packaging company talks about the “circular economy” and the integrated business model that addresses it. Mpact is the largest paper and plastics packaging and recycling business in South Africa, which should help you understand what their reference to a circular economy means. The group employs over 5,100 people and has 47 operating sites. South African sales contribute around 88% of revenue.

The group has released results for the year ended December 2021 and they tick all the boxes.

Revenue increased by 12.6% to R11.5 billion, which drove a much larger percentage increase in underlying operating profit of 56.2% to R948 million. Again, this is the benefit of operating leverage during a recovery period.

The operating margin increase was also driven by the gross profit margin expanding to 36.9%.

The cash generative nature of the business led to a reduction in average net debt. This resulted in net finance costs decreasing by 17.7% to R139.5 million.

The company takes advantage of the stubbornly low multiples on the JSE, with R257 million in share buybacks in 2021 (10% of shares in issue at the start of the year). In addition to this substantial return of capital to shareholders, Mpact also declared a 50 cents per share final dividend for 2021 (compared to nil in the prior period as the group dealt with Covid).

Return on capital employed increased substantially from 11.4% to 17.8%, a level well in excess of Mpact’s cost of capital.

HEPS increased by 89% in 2021 to 343.2 cents. With the current market sell-off, the Price/Earnings multiple has dropped to 8.7x based on yesterday’s closing price.

On a segmental basis, the Paper business enjoyed improved demand and favourable product mix, with higher average selling prices partially offset by input cost pressures. Paper revenue increased by 12.2% and EBIT increased by 51.5%.

The Plastics business grew across most sectors and improved its profitability, despite delays in increasing the selling prices to recover high polymer costs (the input cost for plastics). Revenue was up 14.2% and underlying EBIT increased by 33.7%.

Mpact is selling its plastic trays and films business, Mpact Versapak. The products don’t fit with the rest of the business and engagements with potential buyers are at an early stage. Versapak had a tough time in 2021, with net earnings of just R2 million vs. R15 million in 2020.

In my view, Mpact is a strong South African industrial business with exposure to attractive trends, like export of fruit and localisation of supply chains. With the latest market sell-off, I’m seriously considering adding this to my portfolio.

The risks to the business lie in electricity tariff increases, escalating fuel costs and all the usual South African stuff. These issues should never be ignored.

Verified by MonsterInsights