Thursday, December 11, 2025
Home Blog Page 2

The perils of oversimplifying technology due diligence in acquisitions

Whether your company makes food, builds houses, manages logistics, sells products or provides services, your critical functions run on information technology. As such, it is no longer meaningful to draw a hard line between “tech” and “non-tech” businesses. In most businesses, sales and marketing depend on digital channels, operations rely on data and automation, finance sits on cloud platforms, and HR manages people through software. In practice, nearly every business is a technology business, and in transactions, technology should not be viewed as a side consideration – it is the engine of value and the source of risk. Yet in many acquisitions, especially by non-tech acquirers, technology due diligence remains dangerously superficial. Too many acquirers treat it as a checklist, while missing the deeper questions that determine whether a target’s technology is and can remain compliant, can scale, and can integrate easily, seamlessly and without undue expense.

Modern enterprises are stitched together by technology. Cloud computing hosts enterprise applications; SaaS tools drive collaboration and CRM; mobile apps connect staff and customers; APIs integrate partners and supply chains. Even seemingly simple functions (like invoicing, timekeeping and customer support) operate on digital rails. The more essential these systems become, the greater the legal and operational exposure if they fail, are misused, or are implemented without appropriate governance.

The traditional, superficial approach to technology due diligence is fraught with shortcomings and, given the reliance that a business places on technology as part of its day-to-day operations, a simple glance at technology contracts is insufficient for a company to mitigate the risks.

1. How clean is the target’s technology stack?

    Superficial diligence often stops at verifying that systems “work.” But functioning systems can conceal serious structural weaknesses. This, in turn, creates a myriad of risks, including integration paralysis (especially where the target has legacy and fragmented systems), vendor lock-in, hidden fragility, and valuation mismatch.

    2. Overlooking cyber and data risks

    Many acquirers still regard cybersecurity as an IT hygiene issue. In reality, it is a regulatory, financial and reputational risk zone, giving rise to issues such as inherited vulnerabilities, regulatory penalties, customer attrition (trust is easily lost by clients where cyber breaches occur), and operational disruption.

    3. Underestimating technical debt

    Every system carries “technical debt”, i.e. the accumulated shortcuts and legacy code that slow innovation and inflate maintenance costs. The risk to the acquirer includes unexpected capital expenditure, erosion of deal value (especially where high maintenance costs affect the EBITDA or end-of-support systems require replacement at significant cost), delayed synergies, and innovation bottlenecks.

    4. Ignoring intellectual property (IP) traps

    Technology value rests on ownership and control. Yet hurried diligence often stops at confirming that “the company owns its IP” and does not consider the hidden risks, such as unknown ownership claims (by staff or contractors), open source contamination, AI and data disputes, and jurisdictional misalignment.

    5. Misjudging integration and scalability

    A target’s systems may work well in isolation, but fail under the scale or compliance expectations of a larger enterprise. Most due diligence processes do not fully consider the risks in relation to integration costs, business disruption, compliance risks and cultural resistance.

    6. The false economy of “light touch” diligence

    Under deal pressure, acquirers often scale back on the diligence scope or timeline, especially on technology. This short-term saving often becomes long-term pain, especially where deal fatigue and distractions mean that hidden liabilities emerge after the deal is done, with an inability to renegotiate post-closing, resulting in reputational fallout.

    Savvy acquirers are shifting from transactional to strategic technology diligence, treating it as a lens into capability, not just compliance. A well-structured technology due diligence mitigates key risks by assessing the architecture – which reveals scalability and technical debt before it becomes a capital burden – and the cybersecurity posture of the target, with a view to quantifying its exposure and defining remediation budgets pre-closing. It also assesses the data governance framework by identifying unlawful or high-risk data flows early; the intellectual property ownership position, ensuring that the target has clear title to all software, datasets, and AI models; integration readiness (including predicting real integration cost and time); and the technical leadership, in order to gauge whether the engineering culture can deliver on post-deal strategies.

    The ultimate goal of a well-structured and comprehensive technology due diligence is to transform the technology due diligence from a cost centre exercise into a predictive risk and value tool. Oversimplifying technology due diligence may save days on a timeline, but can cost years of recovery. In the digital era, the real liabilities are embedded not in balance sheets, but in codebases, data and dependencies.

    For any acquirer, understanding the target’s technology landscape is no longer optional. It is the difference between buying an asset that accelerates growth and inheriting a liability that erodes it.

    Boda is Head of Department and Dullabh an Executive: Technology, Media and Telecommunications | ENS

    This article first appeared in DealMakers, SA’s quarterly M&A publication.

    DealMakers is SA’s M&A publication.
    www.dealmakerssouthafrica.com

    Assessing the risk of the culture to be acquired

    0

    Everyone enjoys a growth story, and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) often stand out as the fastest way to scale effectively. Whether it’s snapping up a competitor, expanding into new markets or acquiring new capabilities, the appeal of an M&A deal is clear. However, beneath the spreadsheets and legal jargon lies a major risk that is often overlooked: the company culture being acquired.

    Even the strongest financials, the best product fit, and the most promising synergy projections cannot compensate for a toxic culture. The 2025 Culture Killers Report by Cape Town-based consulting firm 5th Discipline surveyed 150+ professionals in South Africa’s fast-growing climate change sector, a sector attracting increasing investment. The report reveals that poor culture and weak leadership drive employee disengagement and turnover, which can severely undermine ROI. Disengaged employees are estimated to cost companies upwards of 30% of their salary in lost productivity and related expenses.

    M&A due diligence tends to focus heavily on financials, legal compliance, and market position. The most successful and profitable dealmakers, however, also give serious attention to company culture, due to the risks and rewards created by the people within the organisation being acquired. The Culture Killers Report highlights that nearly 20% of employees struggle to face work daily because of toxic cultures. These toxic environments often lead to domino effects – one exit can set off multiple departures as team cohesion breaks down. The time to hire takes, on average, three months, which means businesses may be suffering a two-month inefficiency period between departures and replacements.

    Ironically, the harshest cultural critics are often those with long tenure and senior roles, who are precisely the key leadership and strategic talent buyers want to retain. This presents a significant risk to leadership value and organisational stability. Poor culture correlates with abysmal retention rates; nearly all employees in toxic environments leave within 15 months, while the average ROI on an employee is typically only realised between six to 12 months.

    Under these circumstances, acquisitions can appear less like lucrative investments and more like costly liabilities that drain resources.

    A common response is to inject capital and appoint a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or managing director (MD) to lead the acquired firm, hoping new investment and fresh leadership will spark a turnaround. Yet the Culture Killers data reveals that almost half of employees identify poor communication, lack of motivation, leadership trust and insufficient coaching as major leadership failings. Without addressing these root causes, financial investment is unlikely to translate into productivity gains or improved talent retention, especially where new leaders do not have trust capital.

    Furthermore, replacing a CEO or MD alone does not necessarily solve cultural issues deeply embedded within the organisation. Entrenched behaviours, attitudes and feelings about the company persist far beyond leadership changes. It is entirely possible to invest millions yet lose the talented individuals and competitive edge that originally made the business valuable.

    For M&A to succeed from both strategic and commercial perspectives, culture due diligence must be as comprehensive as financial audits, as many cultural factors are quantifiable in monetary terms. This entails detailed evaluation of leadership styles, employee sentiment, communication clarity, 360-degree feedback, retention, absenteeism, hiring, and training data.

    The 5th Discipline report underscores that companies with engaged leaders and supportive cultures retain their talent longer. Nearly all respondents rating their culture 4/5 or higher reported strong retention beyond 15 months, which translates to three to nine months of additional ROI. Conversely, those who remain solely for compensation or job security tend to rate culture poorly and are more inclined to leave when better opportunities arise. Notably, pay and benefits were less commonly cited as reasons for leaving; the truth remains that people leave people.

    Culture integration is notoriously complex, yet embedding cultural considerations throughout the M&A process can dramatically improve outcomes:

    • Culture audits: Beyond financial due diligence, asking employees what they tell friends about working at the company reveals important cultural insights. Third-party culture assessments encourage candid feedback and uncover gaps early.
    • Leadership assessment & investment: Conducting 360-degree reviews and online performance evaluations identifies leadership strengths and development needs.
    • Leadership enablement: Training leaders in emotional intelligence, effective communication and coaching enhances their ability to inspire and retain teams through transitions.
    • Alignment workshops: Facilitating sessions to unify teams around shared mission, values and operational practices fosters cohesion post-merger or acquisition.
    • Measurement & management: Setting clear KPIs linked to engagement, innovation, productivity and career development not only boosts retention, but aligns culture with business goals.
    • Transparent communication: Maintaining open channels about upcoming changes and providing forums for genuine feedback builds trust and reduces resistance.
    • Tailored integration plans: Recognising that culture cannot be “one-size-fits-all,” integration plans must adapt to different departments, experience levels and functions.

    Almost half of employees surveyed desire better communication and inspiring leadership, which the report identifies as essential for retention and productivity. Investing in these areas leads to lower recruitment costs, heightened engagement and improved returns – precisely what shareholders seek after a deal.

    Ignoring culture means embracing a high-risk investment where multi-million-rand acquisitions could backfire.

    For South African companies targeting significant ROI in renewable energy M&A, culture is not merely a “soft” factor or “PR buzzword”; it is a critical commercial lever. Collaborating with specialists who can transform culture data into practical, financially tangible strategies unlocks enduring impact, agility and market resilience.

    Before deciding to buy, merge, or invest capital in a net-zero economy business, it is essential to understand the culture being acquired, and ensure the readiness to lead, nurture, and invest in the people who will drive sustainable profits.

    Within South Africa’s evolving business landscape, mastering the culture equation is where authentic, lasting financial value begins.

    To access the report by 5th Discipline, follow this link: https://the5thdiscipline.com/home/access-the-culture-killers-report/

    Taylor is the CEO & Founder | 5th Discipline

    This article first appeared in DealMakers, SA’s quarterly M&A publication.

    DealMakers is SA’s M&A publication.
    www.dealmakerssouthafrica.com

    Does regional integration increase M&A regulatory burden?

    0

    This is a tricky topic, which has recently become increasingly important for entities which operate across multiple jurisdictions in Africa. Regional integration, in the form of the SADC, COMESA, EAC and AU (regional organisations), is meant to bring uniformity among the member states. The aim is to remove trade barriers, promote easy movement of labour, increase cross border investment and, in some cases, to facilitate easy access to capital for public and private entities, with better terms through financial institutions established and funded by the regional organisations. However, despite the benefits of regional integration, there is a challenge lurking behind the scenes, in the form of the M&A regulatory burden posed by the regional organisations.

    Some African countries have national merger authorities (NMAs) which are responsible for merger approval processes, and each of these countries’ NMAs has unique key areas on which they focus. Historically, entities operating in multiple African countries would file merger approvals with the NMA in each of those countries. However, regional organisations are now focusing on becoming more integrated and uniform to prevent anti-competitive behaviour and monopoly across the continent, so merger approvals from the regional competition authority are increasingly required. Unfortunately, NMA approvals and local competition laws remain intact and do not cede to the regional competition authority, which means that M&A transactions are notified at both the NMA and regional organisation level. Trying to navigate the multiple regulatory hurdles contributes significantly to the regulatory burden, including time and cost.

    Arguments have been presented that national authorities should focus on the local policies, laws and economic impact of the transaction within the member state, while the relevant regional organisations should focus on the impact across multiple African countries. While this argument is valid, there should be proper integration and uniformity, where each NMA is entrusted with the duty to focus not only on its own market, but also on how the M&A transaction affects the member states of the regional organisation. Alternatively, the NMA should cede control to the relevant regional organisation to make such analysis, with internal dialogue and correspondences between the regional organisation and the NMA to avoid multiple filings.

    Aside from the anti-competition approvals, there may be lack of support or uniformity by regional organisations when it comes to regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions on the continent. Some jurisdictions have simpler regulatory controls, while others impose more stringent requirements. These can include free carry in favour of the member state, and/or mandatory local ownership requirements to qualify for the granting of some permits/licences or approvals. It becomes a challenge for businesses to navigate different regulatory approval requirements across each of these jurisdictions, which then hinders cross border investment and the easy flow of capital between member states. With regional organisations pushing for more integration and uniformity, this aspect must be investigated, especially for businesses which have attained an agreed threshold to qualify for merger approval with the regional competition authority.

    The inconsistency of tax frameworks across member states belonging to the same regional organisation calls for harmonisation. These inconsistencies range from withholding tax obligations, rates and accrual, capital gains tax rates and assessment mechanisms, and VAT frameworks, among others. Ultimately, M&A transactions have to comply with the tax laws of each jurisdiction, but in some instances, approvals and implementation timeframes differ significantly from one member state to another. Overall, this impacts the confidence of investors seeking entry into the continent. In addition, it affects the financial support from external financiers, since the continent still largely depends on financing from non-African financial institutions and banks.

    Regional integration should unlock growth, not entrench fragmentation. Aligning competition, regulatory and tax laws, policies and systems should be a priority. It is the key to turning Africa’s economic blocs into engines of cross-border investment. It should make us more competitive and reduce the hurdles of investment across member states, whether emanating from within or from outside the continent.

    Lui is a Partner | Clyde & Co (Tanzania)

    This article first appeared in DealMakers AFRICA, the continent’s quarterly M&A publication.

    DealMakers AFRICA is a quarterly M&A publication
    www.dealmakersafrica.com

    Private Equity and Wheeling: financing the shift to decentralised power

    Africa’s energy story is undergoing a fundamental shift in 2025, as c.600 million Africans lack access to electricity. Rolling blackouts, rising tariffs and strained utilities have forced commercial institutes to look for alternatives, while investors are searching for sustainable, long-term returns. At the centre of this intersection sits wheeling, which allows independent power producers (IPPs) to deliver electricity directly to commercial institutes through the grid. For private equity, wheeling offers more than just a niche investment play. It represents a scalable platform for financing decentralised power, while giving customers reliable, typically cleaner, energy that bypasses overburdened state utilities.

    Wheeling can be explained as an IPP “wheeling” electricity that it has generated across the existing grid to a consumer, even if the two are not physically connected. Contracts and network charges govern the transaction, making it possible for commercial institutes to secure renewable supply without having to build their own dedicated infrastructure.


    African private sector clean energy investments surged to nearly US$40 billion in 2024, with solar capacity alone exceeding 20 gigawatts, and over 10 gigawatts under construction, primarily driven by Southern Africa.
    South Africa’s power story is one of both crisis and innovation. In the late 1990s, South Africa undertook one of the world’s fastest electrification drives, where roughly 2,5 million households were provided access to electricity. When Eskom’s debt burden and rising tariffs collided with surging demand in the early 2000s, the system fell into crisis. By 2007, load shedding had become a national reality, forcing the government and businesses alike to rethink the centralised utility model.


    The introduction of IPPs in 2012 was a turning point in South Africa’s energy transformation journey. IPPs eased pressure on Eskom, while proving that decentralised energy could be both viable and scalable. Today, wheeling takes that shift further by allowing commercial institutes to secure power directly from IPPs, reducing dependence on Eskom while accelerating the transition to cleaner energy.


    In May 2025, the National Energy Regulator of South Africa established a framework for third-party wheeling that includes rules that standardise how network charges for wheeling are set and collected. By clarifying network charge methodology and access, the rules make wheeling commercially predictable, encouraging more competition and renewable investment.


    For commercial institutes – which are generally the continent’s heaviest consumers of electricity – wheeling is more than an energy hedge, and this is perfectly illustrated by Vodacom’s pioneering virtual wheeling deal with SOLA Group. By securing renewable power through a PPA, Vodacom not only reduced its reliance on Eskom, but also set a blueprint for other companies to follow.
    Investec’s award of an electricity trading licence by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa also represents a significant milestone in the country’s evolving energy landscape. The bank will be partnering with IPPs and facilitating structured funding, offtake arrangements and wheeling solutions.


    The decentralised energy model is also gaining traction beyond South Africa. Kenya’s 2019 Energy Act, reinforced by the 2024 regulations, now enables large consumers to contract directly with IPPs. Eligible commercial institutes consuming more than 1 MVA can soon bypass Kenya Power, opening the door to a competitive open-access energy market. Zambia, Morocco and Egypt are also advancing frameworks that could make wheeling a mainstream option.
    The overall benefit of wheeling is significant, with commercial institutes gaining cleaner, reliable power, while IPPs secure bankable off-takers. For investors, particularly in private equity, wheeling creates a pipeline of long-term, creditworthy deals that align with both returns and sustainability mandates.
    Wheeling plays a pivotal role in advancing ESG objectives by supporting Africa’s transition to low-carbon, sustainable energy. Its cost-effective nature enables broader, affordable access to clean power, helping reduce emissions while improving energy equity. This model delivers both environmental impact and socio-economic upliftment, creating long-term value for communities and investors. In short, wheeling matters because it transforms Africa’s power challenge into an investment and growth opportunity.


    The next frontier for private equity in Africa lies in building regional renewable energy platforms that combine generation, storage and digital innovation. Infrastructure outside South Africa may also be required. These integrated solutions, anchored by bankable corporate off-takers, represent the convergence of infrastructure, finance and technology.


    Private equity investors are already positioning themselves as catalysts in this space. Their participation typically takes four forms:


    • Platform aggregation: bundling smaller PPAs into investment-grade portfolios that attract institutional capital. One example is Discovery Green, a renewable energy platform that enables electricity wheeling while unlocking access to clean, affordable power at scale.


    • Infrastructure funds: acquiring or building IPPs and backing construction of new renewable projects tied to wheeling agreements.


    • Fintech solutions: enabling smaller commercial institutes to access flexible financing structures, as they may not be able to commit to long-term PPAs.


    • Storage investments: adding batteries and smart control systems to projects, improving reliability and making portfolios bankable.


    Each of these approaches strengthens the investment case, aligns with ESG mandates, and builds resilience into Africa’s decentralised power ecosystem.


    Wheeling is more than a technical mechanism; it is a bridge between Africa’s power deficit and its investment opportunity. For commercial institutes, it secures cleaner, more reliable supply. For IPPs, it creates direct demand. And for private equity, it offers a scalable play at the intersection of infrastructure, energy transition and corporate finance. As regulators refine frameworks and commercial institutes demand sustainable power, private equity’s role will only deepen.

    References: 

    1. https://www.eskom.co.za/heritage/history-in-decades/eskom-2003-2012/
    2. https://www.eskom.co.za/distribution/tariffs-and-charges/wheeling/#Why-wheeling
    3. https://energy-news-network.com/industry-news/vodacoms-pioneering-virtual-wheeling-solution-goes-live-in-south-africa/?utm
    4. https://efficacynews.africa/2025/06/19/africas-power-sector-transforms-as-kenya-zambia-and-south-africa-embrace-open-access-energy-markets/?utm

    5. https://empowerafrica.com/africa-by-the-numbers-600-million-africans-still-lack-electricity-2024/
    6. https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/08/11/africas-solar-capacity-surpasses-20-gw/
    7. https://www.investec.com/en_za/welcome-to-investec/press/investec-granted-energy-trading-licence-by-nersa.html
    8. https://www.discovery.co.za/business/discovery-green

    Ghost Bites (Araxi | Glencore | Hyprop | Nedbank | Raubex | Sabvest)

    Araxi might be expanding in the payments space (JSE: AXX)

    This is certainly the part of the business that they should be focusing on

    Earlier this week, we saw results from Araxi (previously Capital Appreciation) that highlighted the huge gap in performance between the Payments segment and the Software segment. My view is that they should be getting out of Software and just focusing on what they are really good at – Payments!

    We don’t seem to be at that point yet, but the company has released a cautionary announcement based on negotiations for a potential acquisition of a “meaningful payment services business” – and that sounds like the right sort of thing for them to be focusing on.

    With an unencumbered balance sheet and over R300 million in cash as an acquisition war chest, they are in a strong position to be able to do a smart deal. Now we have to wait and see exactly what that deal is, assuming something actually materialises after this cautionary. Remember, there’s no guarantee of a deal being announced.


    Copper was the focus at Glencore’s Capital Markets Day (JSE: GLN)

    The goal is to become one of the largest copper producers in the world

    Here’s some festive 2025 relationship advice: find someone who looks at you the way the mining sector looks at copper. The bunfight over this commodity has been quite something to watch, with the biggest balance sheets in the game being positioned for copper expansion strategies. If there’s any disappointment in demand vs. current expectations, it’s going to get nasty.

    At Glencore’s Capital Markets Day, the headline story was a plan to significantly increase copper production and become one of the largest copper producers in the world over the next decade. Here’s a useful slide on why copper is the belle of the ball at the moment:

    Interestingly, Argentina is where the action is happening for them, with other South American territories like Peru and Chile featuring as well. They expect copper volumes to achieve a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.4% from 2026 to 2029, while total group production measured on a copper equivalent production basis will have a CAGR of 4.0%. In other words, copper itself will increase a lot faster than the other metals.

    Although they expect copper to self-fund its growth pipeline, it doesn’t hurt to have the cash-generative coal and other assets to support the group. They’ve also achieved a more efficient group thanks to identified cost-saving opportunities worth $1 billion a year across 300 initiatives. They expect to fully deliver these savings by 2026, with half already locked in for 2025.

    Glencore has also been on a drive to simplify the portfolio, with approximately 35 assets either sold or shut since 2021 and $6.3 billion raised from key disposals. They talk about having eliminated around 1,000 roles through a new operating structure. This is clearly where a big chunk of cost savings have come from.

    The full presentation is obviously filled with fascinating details about Glencore and the broader sector. If you’re keen to take a look, you’ll find it here.


    Hyprop taps the market for R300 million (JSE: HYP)

    The capital raises are picking up in the REIT sector

    Hot on the heels of a raise at sector peer Equites Property Fund (JSE: EQU), we now have Hyprop with an accelerated bookbuild. At least they are telling us how much they actually want, in this case R300 million to add to the R808 million raised earlier this year. That’s more than a billion rand of fresh equity this year!

    In terms of the planned use of funds, Hyprop has found a balance between vague explanations and some specifics. There’s the usual “growth pipeline and potential acquisitions” comment that basically lets them do anything, accompanied by references to some specific capex projects like the Somerset Mall extension and a food court upgrade in Canal Walk, along with solar projects in the local portfolio.

    In short, they are tapping a hot market for more equity capital. The timing is good and we are going to see more of this in the REIT sector.

    Importantly, the guidance for growth in distributable income per share of 10% to 12% for the year ended June 2026 is unchanged by the raise.


    It’s been a rough year for Nedbank investors (JSE: NED)

    There wasn’t much growth even before the Transnet settlement

    Sometimes, underperformance is so stark that a share price heads in a completely different direction to the peer group. In this year-to-date chart, it’s unfortunately the bank with the green logo, Nedbank, that is the only one in the red:

    This isn’t entirely due to the settlement with Transnet for R600 million. The market is smarter than that, as Nedbank’s market cap is currently over R120 billion. The settlement is therefore just 0.5% of the market cap.

    No, this underperformance is thanks to Nedbank posting weak growth numbers despite this being a strong year for the South African economy. If they can’t achieve meaningful growth in this period, then what chances do they have when the cycle gets tough again?

    A pre-close update that deals with the 10 months to October shows the disappointment that shareholders have had to stomach. Net interest income (NII) grew by low-to-mid single digits, which is better than the tepid 2% growth in the six months to June 2025. Interest rate decreases obviously put pressure on this number, but Nedbank also has weak margins vs. some of its peers. At least the credit loss ratio is in a decent place, below the midpoint of the through-the-cycle target range of 60 basis points to 100 basis points.

    Non-interest revenue (NIR) growth is the really poor story, sitting below mid-single digits. You cannot boost return on equity as a bank if you can’t grow your NIR at a meaningful rate above inflation.

    To add to the problems, expenses grew by mid-to-upper single digits for the period, which means it increased faster than NII and certainly NIR. This is negative jaws territory (as they call it in banking), with margins going the wrong way.

    These numbers exclude the Transnet settlement, as does the guidance for the full year of diluted HEPS growth being in a range of flat to low-single digits. Return on equity is expected to be 15% or higher.

    Probably the only highlight here is the share repurchases of R2.4 billion year-to-date. But this is taken into account in the HEPS guidance, so things are still far from exciting.

    Nedbank desperately needs to inject some life into its story. Their acquisition of fintech iKhokha was approved by the Competition Commission and closed on 1 December. Their sale of Ecobank to Bosquet is awaiting regulatory approvals across various divisions. They’ve also made some divisional management changes.

    In the absence of any meaningful progress though, Nedbank has proven to be a value trap this year i.e. “cheap” for a reason.


    Raubex has made it explicit: they are looking to sell Bauba Resources (JSE: RBX)

    Here is yet another example of M&A being reversed down the line

    Back in 2022, Raubex went through a mandatory offer process (i.e. they deliberately triggered the 35% ownership threshold) to acquire Bauba Resources. This was a dicey strategic fit from the start, as it brought mining risks into a group that already faces plenty of cyclical risks from construction, infrastructure and other key exposures – including other mining clients!

    Just three years later, the usual fate for poorly conceived deals is about to play out: Raubex is now looking for a buyer for Bauba Resources. It’s the right call, as being stubborn about not sorting out the problem doesn’t help anyone. If anything, it’s just example number five zillion of why M&A should always be treated with caution.

    This move was well telegraphed in the latest set of results, with Raubex making it clear that they were “evaluating the long-term strategic direction” of the business. That’s just fancy corporate speak for “we probably need to sell this thing” – and quickly.

    At this stage, all they’ve done is appoint an advisor to help them assess strategic options and find a potential buyer. There’s no guarantee of a transaction going ahead, even if there’s a “for sale” sign hanging over the door. If they do find a buyer, it’s going to be very interesting to compare the selling price to the 2022 acquisition price.


    Lovely growth numbers at Sabvest (JSE: SBP)

    This is one of the best local investment holding companies

    Sabvest has a strong reputation for capital allocation skills and returns generated for shareholders. They’ve been around for a long time and the track record speaks for itself.

    There will be good years and bad years of course, but the year ending December 2025 will go down as a great year. In a trading statement for the period, they highlighted NAV per share growth of between 18% and 25%, along with an expected jump in the dividend per share of between 19% and 24%.

    The share price reflects this momentum, up 36% year-to-date.


    Nibbles:

    • Director dealings:
      • The current CFO of Growthpoint (JSE: GRT), who is retiring early next year, has sold shares worth nearly R1.3 million.
      • The CEO of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares for direct family members worth R92k.
      • An associate of the CEO of Grand Parade Investments (JSE: GPI) bought shares worth R29.6k.
      • An associate of a director of South Ocean Holdings (JSE: SOH) bought shares worth R20.7k.
    • Omnia (JSE: OMN) participated at the Absa Corporate Summit and has made the presentation available here. It’s a goodie to work through if you want to get to grips with the company.
    • Here’s some encouraging news for the Altvest Credit Opportunities Fund (JSE: BACC), by far the best part of Africa Bitcoin Corporation (JSE: BAC). The fund has placed notes worth R50 million under the R5 billion Domestic Medium Term Note Programme. They need to keep scaling that thing and scale requires capital.
    • Will PSV Holdings (JSE: PSV) come back from the dead? There’s been a lot of effort to try and make this happen, with DNG Energy working to get the company out of liquidation and suitable for status as a listed company once more. The latest update is that the liquidator has requested a motivated Section 155 Scheme of Arrangement (essentially a compromise with creditors). This is expected to be received in December.

    Ghost Bites (Araxi | Equites Property Fund | Exxaro | FirstRand | Merafe | Resilient | Shaftesbury | Sibanye-Stillwater)

    Araxi (previously Capital Appreciation) has released interim results (JSE: AXX)

    The Software business continues to drag everything down

    Araxi’s results for the six months ended September 2025 have been impacted by accounting restatements. There are a number of restatements that ended up boosting earnings per share in the prior year without having much of an impact on the balance sheet or the cash flow statement. This means that the base period has created a much more demanding profit number off which to grow. Accounting restatements exist for a reason, as the idea is to improve comparability by ensuring that the policies are applied to both periods being presented.

    Araxi is keen for you to use normalised earnings growth instead of reported earnings growth. In making these normalisation adjustments, they take out the recognition of a licence fee as well as the restructuring costs in the Software division. Normalised HEPS growth is a meaty 58%, while growth in HEPS as reported was just 1.8%. That’s a huge gap that would require high conviction to be okay with.

    Group revenue was up by just 2.3%, so that’s the first concern in the context of this high normalised growth number. Group EBITDA was up just 0.4%. As final evidence, we can just look at the dividend growth – or lack thereof, in this case. The dividend is flat at 4.5 cents per share. As you can probably tell by now, I’m not sure that the normalised growth is any indication at all of “normal” growth in the business, but time will tell.

    We can now dig into the segments. The Payments division is doing really well, with revenue up 23.2% and EBITDA up 33.1% to R184.3 million. Software continues to be a catastrophe, with revenue down 20.2% and EBITDA crashing 82.7% to just R6.9 million. The Payments division has an EBITDA margin of 47.6% and Software sits at 2.7%. The very best thing they could do is get rid of the Software business and focus on what investors are actually interested in: Payments.

    There’s seems to be no desire to do this though, with management promising that the restructuring activities in Software will deliver annualised cost savings of R35 million to R40 million that weren’t visible in the first half because of once-off restructuring costs. Fair enough, we will wait and see what the second half looks like. But the underlying story is what it is – the Payments business is a lucrative, dependable asset and the Software business looks incapable of attracting a high valuation multiple.

    The group is well known for having no debt. In fact, they have over R300 million available for growth. In the context of a market cap of R2.2 billion, that’s a significant cash pile.


    Equites Property Fund raised over R700 million for local development opportunities (JSE: EQU)

    The market seems unbothered by the slow exit from the UK

    As I wrote about earlier this week, Equites announced what I think could be referred to as a “bland accelerated bookbuild” – a capital raise with few or no underlying details. Sure, they’ve given a general idea of the local development opportunities in a separate trading update, but they didn’t even tell the market how much they were planning to raise and which projects would be prioritised!

    None of it seems to matter, as the sun is shining in the property sector and so institutional investors are literally falling over one other to throw capital at listed funds. Equites raised R712 million at a discount of just 1.32% to the 30-day VWAP.

    The good times are here for the REITs. You can expect to see more and more bookbuilds. And somewhere in the next 12 – 24 months, it’s probably going to get silly enough that I will rotate my exposure away from the sector. You only have to look at the charts a decade ago to see how the cycle plays out.


    Exxaro is likely to slightly miss their full-year guidance (JSE: EXX)

    Local coal sales (excluding Eskom) were disappointing

    Exxaro released a pre-close message for the year ending December 2025. With a significant decline in coal export prices having been suffered this year, it hasn’t been an easy year. Despite this, Exxaro reported strong earnings growth at the halfway mark in the year and the share price is up 8% year-to-date.

    Total coal volumes are expected to be in line with the prior year, which means that they expect to miss guidance for the year by 3%. The biggest miss was in domestic coal sales other than to Eskom. Coal capex is expected to be around 3% higher than guidance, so the combined impact suggests that they will probably disappoint the market with full-year free cash flow numbers. It will of course depend on what the full-year costs look like.

    In corporate news, the majority of the key suspensive conditions for the acquisition of manganese assets from Ntsimbintle Holdings and OMH Mauritius have been fulfilled. There are only a few conditions still to be met.


    FirstRand’s guidance is intact – excluding the UK motor finance industry mess (JSE: FSR)

    The battle with the UK regulatory is far from over

    FirstRand released a voluntary trading update for the six months ending December 2025. They are performing in line with expectations, with the guidance of full-year growth of “high mid-teens” still intact. They also expect normalised ROE to move closer to the upper end of the stated range of 18% to 22%.

    Although interest rates have come down, net interest income has grown thanks to the positive impact on margin from strategies to drive attractive growth in advances across South Africa, the rest of Africa and the UK. They expect to see improvement in absolute advances in the corporate business second half of the year, so this is mainly a margin story for now in that book. In the retail and commercial books, there has been an increase in activity.

    Non-interest revenue, a key source of ROE, is up on the previous financial year and showing strong momentum in areas like insurance and global markets, boosted by private equity deals.

    The credit quality looks solid, with the credit loss ratio at the bottom end of the through-the-cycle range.

    In terms of expenses, growth is 2% to 3% above inflation. Aside from negotiated salary increases, my observation across the financial services names is that technology spend runs well above inflation.

    All of this good news excludes the provision for the UK motor commission matter. The FCA’s final redress scheme is seen by FirstRand as going beyond what is fair. It sounds like the scheme would lead to the loss of more than the cumulative profits made over the period by the group.

    In summary: FirstRand is doing well, but this irritating overhang isn’t going anywhere just yet.


    Merafe moves ahead with closing the Wonderkop and Boshoek smelters (JSE: MRF)

    Energy prices mean that these smelters just aren’t viable

    Merafe has been working with Eskom to try and find a solution to the crisis facing the Boshoek and Wonderkop smelters. Although a proposal was received at the end of November, it just isn’t enough to save these operations. The silver lining is that it does create a future for the Lion smelter, so not all is lost.

    This doesn’t help the employees of Boshoek and Wonderkop of course. The Merafe – Glencore (JSE: GLN) joint venture has issued retrenchment notices to the employees of these two smelters. They will both be placed on care and maintenance from 1 January 2026.


    Resilient flags double-digit distribution growth (JSE: RES)

    The positive sentiment in the property sector continues

    Resilient REIT has released a pre-close update for the year ending December 2025. The expected growth in the distribution per share is at least 10%, so that’s a great data point to show just how strong this year has been for the property sector.

    The focus on retail property has been valuable, with retail sales up 5.6% for the 10 months to October. Both renewals and new leases have shown positive reversions, coming in at a blended increase of 6.3%. Escalations on the leases are running between 5.4% and 5.7%, so that’s good inflation protection.

    To add to the happy news, the extensive renewable energy installation programme has led to Resilient being able to generate 39.8% of its own energy requirements. Load shedding may feel like a bad nightmare now rather than a daily reality, but the benefit of this strategy goes well beyond energy security. Based on the cost of power from Eskom, there’s an attractive yield associated with these projects.

    The European exposure – Spain / France and Lighthouse Properties (JSE: LTE) – is also performing well.

    When you layer on the benefit of reducing interest rates, you find yourself having a particularly good time with a story like this. Double-digit growth in the distribution per share is really impressive!


    London’s West End continues to perform for Shaftesbury (JSE: SHC)

    Positive reversions are the order of the day

    Shaftesbury released a trading update covering 1 July to 31 October. The fund is focused on London, so this represents the back-end of summer and then the pre-Black Friday and festive season period.

    Leasing activity has been strong, with recent transactions running 4.3% ahead of the June 2025 estimated rental value (ERV) and 10% ahead of the previous passing rents. Occupancies are strong, with only 2.6% of the portfolio available to let.

    There’s no shortage of asset management and refurbishment initiatives underway, with around 4.1% of the portfolio ERV currently being worked on. This is being supported by a balance sheet in great shape, with the loan-to-value at 17%.


    Sibanye-Stillwater announces a three-year wage deal in the gold operations (JSE: SSW)

    This is great news for the business

    With the gold price continuing to do wonderful things for the industry and for our country, I’m pleased to see that Sibanye-Stillwater has reached a deal with AMCU, NUM, UASA and Solidarity regarding wages. The unions have a history of obliterating investor sentiment in the local mining industry, but those days are hopefully behind us now.

    The agreement covers July 2025 to June 2028, with an increase that works out to roughly 5.4% per annum. The exact increase varies by category of employee.

    This seems like a fair increase that is above the inflation band being targeted by the SARB. Now the gold price just needs to keep behaving itself!


    Nibbles:

    • Director dealings:
      • A director of Impala Platinum (JSE: IMP) sold shares worth R11.8 million.
      • A director of Momentum (JSE: MTM) bought shares worth R180k.
      • An associate of a director of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares worth R85k.
      • An associate of a director of South Ocean Holdings (JSE: SOH) bought shares worth R11.5k.
    • Paul Mann has recovered from what I’m sure was the world’s most frustrating post-op process of being unable to travel. This means that he has returned as Executive Chairman and CEO of ASP Isotopes (JSE: ISO). Robert Ainscow will return to the COO role. There’s a lot going on at the company and it’s good to see them back at full strength.
    • Italtile (JSE: ITE) CEO Lance Foxcroft is stepping down from the role due to “increased family commitments” – interesting. He will instead run Ceramic Industries, the segment he previously ran. Given the huge supply and demand imbalance plaguing that manufacturing business, I can’t see it being a much less demanding job than group CEO. Brandon Wood, currently the Group COO, has been appointed as CEO Designate. He’s previously been the Group CFO as well, so there’s no shortage of bench strength here. He will formally take on the CEO position on 1 July 2026.
    • Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) announced that the acquisition of Consani Industrial Park for R437.3 million has been implemented and the property transferred on 2 December. The loan-to-value ratio is between 26% and 27%. Spear’s gross portfolio asset value is now up to R6.8 billion.
    • MTN Zakhele Futhi (JSE: MTNZF) has distributed the circular to shareholders that deals with the final steps in the dance to wind up the scheme and return the residual value to shareholders.

    Ghost Stories #86: The “always-on” mentality at Sirius Real Estate

    Listen to the show using this podcast player:

    Sirius Real Estate is a great example of a JSE-listed property fund that gives local investors a chance to participate in offshore markets. With a strategy focused on the UK and Germany, Sirius follows an “always-on” mentality to the opportunities in those markets.

    Whether following megatrends like defence spending and the further industrialisation of the German economy, or being open to opportunistic plays in business parks that offer attractive upside opportunities, Sirius is never too far away from a deal.

    To understand more about the strategy of the fund and how they win in these markets, I was joined by a full house of CEO Andrew Coombs, CFO Chris Bowman and CIO Tariq Khader. Get ready to learn all about Sirius and the opportunities for this fund.

    This podcast has been sponsored by Sirius Real Estate. As always, I was given an opportunity to dig into the strategy and ask my own questions in my quest to learn more. You must always do your own research and speak to a financial advisor before making any decision to invest. This podcast should not be seen as an investment recommendation or an endorsement.

    Full Transcript:

    The Finance Ghost: Welcome to this episode of Ghost Stories. I’m your host, the Finance Ghost. I’m so excited to be doing this because I get to speak to the management team of such an interesting real estate fund on the JSE. 

    They are very well known for their active management approach, for doing lots of deals. For finding stuff that has some really good tenants, as well as some fixer-upper type elements to it. So, they don’t just sit back and own the properties and wait to see what happens. They actually go out there and really improve them, and follow a very focused strategy in the UK and Germany. So that is, of course, Sirius Real Estate. 

    If you’ve been following property funds on the JSE, you’ll know the name. You’ll probably know a little bit about their strategy. And today we have, essentially, a full house – Andrew Coombs, the CEO, Chris Bowman, the CFO, and Tariq Khader, the CIO. Really cool to have all of you here with us. 

    Andrew, I’m just going to jump in and start with you. Let’s begin with an overview of why the UK and Germany are your markets of focus for Sirius. Because that literally is where you spend your time making acquisitions – and to the extent that you sell properties as well, that’s where the portfolio sits, basically. Why do you believe that Sirius can – and does – win in these regions?

    Andrew Coombs: Well, thank you very much. There are a few reasons. Firstly, it wins because it’s a very well-run, extremely well-disciplined organisation of over 500 people in 150 locations across two countries, those countries being the UK and Germany.

    And of course, what we do is we specialise in the ownership and operation of industrial parks. 

    Typically, what you’ll find us ‘owning’ in Germany is a park consisting of a dozen or 15 buildings all on the same park. Some of those buildings might be warehouses, some of them might have offices above them, factories, basements – a whole range of categories of space that we run and operate on those industrial estates. 

    And if you think about the UK, it’s an interesting story because in the UK there is an undersupply, comparative to demand, of industrial property. And the demand for that property has increased, all the more so since Brexit. Why? Because lots of things that used to be imported from Europe without any trade friction used to come into the UK. Now, a lot more of those things are assembled and distributed from within the UK, because of the Europe-UK trade friction in that post-Brexit world. 

    So what we’ve got is increasing demand, and actually, the supply is not even stable. Because it isn’t really economical for people to build more of this stuff. And what’s happening with things like the environmental rulings that are coming in is these old industrial brick buildings are very often being torn down. So, you’ve got a perfect storm here. A situation whereby the demand is increasing, and the supply is actually shortening. 

    And in addition to that, in the post-Brexit world, the UK is decoupling from the European cycle. 

    You’re seeing it with interest rates. Interest rates in the UK are higher than they are in Germany. So, German interest rates have probably bottomed out now. UK interest rates are still coming down. You’re seeing it with inflation. Inflation in Europe is much lower than inflation in the UK, and less sticky. 

    So, you’re seeing a real decoupling of the economies, which makes it all the more interesting to Sirius. Because if I turn to Germany, the story is different. And the story is different inasmuch as we are involved in two really countercyclical markets. In Germany, unlike the UK, there is an oversupply of industrial property. And actually, whilst demand is increasing, the demand is still not sufficient to fill more than 90% of the industrial space within the market. 

    But our platform and our ability to know and understand well the local markets that we operate in, in and around the seven major cities in Germany, mean that we can mitigate the risk of vacancy. In fact, what we can do with our platform is we can divide our property up into different products, some of them much higher yielding than traditional conventional products that you would find in industrial property. 

    And by doing that, we are in a position where, because of the oversupply, we can buy the property at a discount. Not just a discount to replacement cost, but a discount to the secondary use cost that that property would command, for example, in the UK market. 

    We can get that discount because of the oversupply, but then we can mitigate the risk of the oversupply using our platform to put high-yielding products into the parks and get the best of both worlds: a low entry point, and the ability to manage a much higher, much more sustainable, much more interesting yield. 

    So this is two different stories. In one market, undersupply, overdemand. In the other market, it’s all about being able to access the property at highly discounted rates and then use your platform to be able to run the property as a premium. 

    And we really love the countercyclical nature of the way in which the two economies have decoupled, because what that means is that if I look back over the last 18 months, we’ve invested over 200 million into the UK market and probably something slightly less into Germany. 

    But if we look now, as we see the UK get more difficult and the tailwinds gather in Germany, we will be pivoting towards more investment in that German market. And the fact that we have two countercyclical markets means that we have an always-on mentality in terms of our ability to be able to deploy capital into markets to get return.

    The Finance Ghost: Thank you, that is super insightful and genuinely very interesting. Here in South Africa, you don’t realise – this decoupling, you’re seeing it every day. Obviously, we know about Brexit and what’s happening, more or less, but to actually hear it explained like that is so interesting.

    Because the UK and Germany really do give you diversification, then. It’s not just to say, “Oh, it’s a European fund.” These are two different places, at the end of the day. They are two really different places, and they’ve got two completely different supply-and-demand situations, as you said; macroeconomic situations. 

    I love that ‘always-on mentality’. So that keeps guys like Tariq nice and busy – and I look forward to hearing from him later, definitely. But Andrew, I want to ask you one other question, and that is around specifically the defence strategy in Germany. 

    So I did actually notice in your announcement that came out very recently (it was literally a couple of days ago), you did talk about that focus in the near term on German acquisitions now. But something else you’re doing in Germany is this defence strategy. And obviously, that’s a nice big macro theme around Europe at the moment – thanks to the geopolitical environment, and the Trump administration, and, essentially, this rearmament of Europe and all the stuff that people have been talking about for the past year. So, you’ve made some hires. You’ve recently closed a deal. It’s all very interesting. 

    I think let’s talk through that a little bit because, even sitting here in South Africa, I’ve been wondering. What is it about these properties that makes them so specialised for defence applications? And what does that strategy look like in Germany?

    Andrew Coombs: I believe that we are about to enter a defence supercycle in Germany. And please excuse me, I’m going to go back a little bit. I’m going to go back to 2021, the end of Chancellor Merkel’s grip on German (and arguably European) politics. 

    And it’s something we watched very carefully at Sirius. We said this is going to be a time of very large-scale change. In the same way as the end of the Thatcher era in the UK led to political and economic change, we always saw the Merkel era coming to an end as being a point where things change fundamentally in Germany. 

    And I take you back to something that Merkel said as late as September ’21, when she said that Germany cannot defend its borders. She said it very publicly, and you could have been forgiven for believing she said it to pacify Putin. Because Merkel, who comes from a family that originally grew up in the West and defected to the East – very unusual for people to have defected that way, when the wall was up – Merkel understood the mentality of Putin, and she was pacifying him when she said that Germany cannot defend its borders. 

    Of course, at that time, you had two gas pipelines (one up and running), and you had economic dependability between Germany and also, Russia. Well, look, those days have passed, and we now have a chancellor called Merz. 

    Merz is the first chancellor since German unification who has seen military service. He was an artillery officer in the ’70s. His defence minister and deputy is a gentleman by the name of Pistorius. Pistorius, although he’s been in politics for nearly two decades, has always focused on defence; he’s always been a defence specialist. And Merz is very clear – not only does Germany need to defend its borders, but Germany needs to become the backbone of European defence.

    Now, if you just consider that position between September ’21 and today, that is a huge shift in terms of the national attitude where a subject like defence is concerned. And of course, what we’ve seen in the intervening period is Russia invading part of Ukraine. And people say to me things like, “Yeah, yeah, but if there’s peace, all of this will drop away.” Unfortunately, I don’t believe that is the case. 

    I do not believe that if there is a cessation of violence in Ukraine tomorrow, that Merz will adopt Merkel’s previous position of we have no intention of defending our borders. I think the cat is out of the bag now. And I would love to believe that there’s going to be a cessation of violence in Ukraine, but whether there is or there isn’t, Germany will now continue to invest in its defence. We have entered a new era, whatever happens in Ukraine. 

    And that new era is supported by the lifting of the debt brake. Meaning that not only do we have normal defence spending of 3% GDP in Germany, but what we also have, from the last government, is a €100 billion fund, which is halfway through being spent on defence. 

    And then, in addition to that, following the lifting of the debt brake, we have a further €400 billion that is to be spent on defence. That’s over half a trillion of fiscal stimulus going back into the German economy to focus on defence. That is absolutely huge. It’s like nothing that Germany has seen in modern-day history, either economically or from a defence perspective. 

    Now, what can you point to that’s specific? What can you do to come out of those big headline numbers and say, “Yeah, yeah, but what’s really happening?” Well, something that’s really happening is that the German army has announced the formation of five new brigades. That’s 40,000 soldiers. 

    You probably saw earlier this week that France is contemplating returning to limited levels of conscription. Out of the five new brigades, one of the brigades – the Lithuanian brigade, the 45th Brigade – is already up and running and based in Lithuania. First time German troops have been permanently based outside of their own borders since the Second World War. 

    To support those brigades, the German government has issued orders of €7.7 billion. The main beneficiary of those orders is Rheinmetall. €7.7 billion of orders, on armoured fighting vehicles and associated needs around logistics. 

    Everything from the trailers that transport the armoured fighting vehicles (there’s a mass world shortage of those, even the Americans haven’t got enough tank transporter trailers). Everything to do with the tracks on the fighting vehicles, to the armour, to the laser rangefinders. All of these sit within the €7.7 billion order that is already issued. 

    And what that means is there are thousands of companies now in Germany looking to increase their production of everything associated with those fighting vehicles and those five new brigades. 

    And what you will see, if you look carefully, in the manufacturing figures in Germany, you will see that they have dipped slightly recently. Don’t be misled by that. That is the factories that used to produce cars, the factories that used to produce other things, that are now stopping production because they’re being converted over to the elements involved in that €7.7 billion government order. 

    That is not speculation. It has been issued. The money is there, it’s being passed to suppliers. The production lines will begin in the next two to three quarters. And that will need to be underpinned by industrial property. 

    For every €10 that is spent per year, you are going to need about €1 of rents to underpin the space that the production of the orders associated with that €7.7 billion goes into. And those are not going to be offices, those are not going to be houses, they’re not going to be retail. They are going to be factories and industrial sites that produce things for the defence industry. And that is why Sirius is so well placed in Germany at the beginning of what I believe will be a defence supercycle.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah. So, if you look at the Rheinmetall share price – I checked now while you were talking – 149% year-to-date. That tells you something about the amount of spend going into the space, and certainly the market’s understanding of that and the positive sentiment towards it. So thank you, that makes a lot of sense. 

    And so, just to confirm, it really is just a case of tons of new industrial space required, as opposed to overly-specialised manufacturing space for the defence industry. It sounds like there’s just this high-level demand, right, that’s going to filter down now?

    Andrew Coombs: Absolutely. 

    The Finance Ghost: So, we’ve heard a lot now about the macro story. We’ve heard all about the German defence story and some really compelling arguments to be made there. I think we’re going to move across now to Chris. That is, the CFO of Sirius. Chris, thank you for your time today. Really good to have you here. 

    The question that I’d like to pose to you is mainly around capital deployment. And of course, we see a lot of capital raises from Sirius, pretty much on an ongoing basis. Andrew spoke earlier to the ‘always-on mentality’, and to do ‘always on’ in property, you’ve got to have ongoing access to capital. You’ve got to raise the stuff, and you’ve got to deploy it. 

    And of course, if you take too long to deploy it, then you end up with a cash-drag problem. And if you deploy too quickly out of desperation, then you end up with really bad deals. So that’s what you guys need to do, of course – is try and balance this off. 

    And perhaps, Chris, you can just talk us through this prioritisation and how you actually do this in terms of managing the risk of cash drag versus the risk of poor transactions?

    Chris Bowman: Yeah, sure, good question. Look, I think – like lots of other facets of the business at Sirius – when it comes to raising capital, first and foremost, we are disciplined. We only raise capital when we have a really compelling acquisition pipeline to actually go and put that capital into, to ultimately create accretion for shareholders in the earnings and the FFO, which is all about the core sort of principle of Sirius: driving shareholder value. 

    So yes, we have raised capital a number of times and, most recently, twice in the last two years. But that’s always been off the back of having a really compelling pipeline. And I think your question expands there as to, “Okay, how do we then maintain discipline about putting that capital to work?” 

    Well, yeah, there are times when things change. For instance, we last raised capital in the summer of 2024, and later that year, there was a lot of upheaval politically, both in Germany (the German government changed) and obviously with the US elections. Then, we remained disciplined in that environment. And we did, we took a little bit longer to deploy capital than we had expected, but at the same time, we have the flexibility within the capital structure to be able to tweak our dividend payout to protect shareholders from that cash drag. 

    And ultimately, what have we done? Well, as you’ve heard from Andrew and as you’ll hear from Tariq shortly as well, we’ve now deployed €370 million into acquisitions just in the last eight months. 

    So, we’ve demonstrated we’ve got the capability to put really significant amounts of capital into a really exciting pipeline and portfolio of opportunities, which will drive value for shareholders in future years. So, I guess I come back to discipline, and very much discipline about creating long-term value.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, I love that. And the discipline is in the raise as much as it is in anything else. You only raise when you need to. I think that’s a really good insight for listeners and investors to take from this. And of course, you’ve got to be disciplined in the acquisitions as well. 

    So, Tariq, this is where we can bring you in as the CIO, because the acquisition strategy at Sirius is always super interesting. I must say, I really enjoy reading the Sirius deal announcements. They seem to have quite a common flavour in terms of how you guys do things. I always seem to notice a big anchor tenant, and then there’s some vacancy rate to work with. There are some shorter-dated leases to work with. So, just really interesting stuff coming through there. And in the disclosure by Sirius, you even split the assets into what you call ‘value-add’ and ‘mature’, which I think speaks directly to where they are in their life cycle. 

    So, I’m going to open the floor to you now. Just walk us through some of the approaches that you take to these properties, and why you believe Sirius has had so much success in this area of actively managing these properties and then getting these outsized returns as a result.

    Tariq Khader: Yeah, look, I’m really pleased you’ve mentioned that value-add/mature split that we disclosed, because I think that is probably the one slide in the presentation that we typically turn to, to illustrate the Sirius business model. 

    And it’s really a simple business model on paper. You take value-add assets, you transform them into mature assets, recycle the cash, and then reinvest in value-add assets. But how you go about that transformation, I think, is part of what we’ve built is a platform that has the capability to transform these assets. 

    And what we like to do is one-third of our portfolio at the moment is in this ‘mature’ bucket. So these are assets which have been through this transformation process. And these are assets which have strong cash flows (where we’re enjoying that benefit, of having stable cash flows), or assets which are being held for recycling. 

    But the really interesting part is that two-thirds of the portfolio which is in that ‘value-add’ bucket, because here typically these assets have high vacancy. Where we need to either put our sales and marketing function to drive leads inquiries and sales conversions, or we need to invest modest amounts of capex – low-value capex, typically in the region of €100 per square meter – to invest in these, to generate returns in excess of 30% ROI to drive occupancy and rate across these sites. 

    And right now, the two-thirds probably has about 300,000 square meters of opportunity for us to kind of work through. And that’s typically about a three-year runway that we’ve got there.

    But how do we tie that into acquisitions? 

    We’re always looking for assets which have challenges for other property companies that we see as opportunities, that we know our platform has the capability to address. Now we can’t address every problem that everyone else has, but we have a specific set of criteria that we’re looking out for. 

    Like you’ve mentioned, vacancy is one of them. We’re not afraid of vacancy. We recently acquired an asset in Klipphausen, which is in Dresden. We knew the anchor tenant was leaving in six months, vacating the whole site. Within 12 months, we’ve managed to fill that entire site, and now it’s fully let. So we knew a lot about the area, we knew the capability of our platform, so we were confident in being able to fill that space. 

    We also like assets where there is very poor service charge recovery, because we have an in-house team and we have an in-house service charge process where we’re able to recover 90% of our operating costs at just over 80% occupancy. So, we have built up a way and a methodology that we’re able to optimise service charge recovery. 

    And lastly, what we typically love to find is spaces where other operators deem to be structural void – basements which have never been used; loft spaces; areas above factories. This is the gold dust for the Sirius model, because we love to just invest small amounts of money. 

    And this is where we generate those high-yielding spaces where we’re able to use targeted capex investment (again, low-value capex) to create new types of products – such as self-storage, work boxes, other flexible products – where we’re able to drive the rates up on space which we’ve essentially got for free, because it was structural void. 

    That’s where a lot of our returns and yield come from – through that transformation process. So, hopefully that gives you a bit of a flavour as to our acquisition approach and what we look for.

    The Finance Ghost: No, it does, absolutely. It’s super interesting. And it must be quite a lot of fun, I would think, actually. As opposed to buying something that’s a yield on something that works already and you’re just managing the life of the lease. This does sound a little bit more juicy, for sure. 

    And I guess another source of fun for you (and sometimes it’s not fun, I’m sure. Sometimes it’s a headache, but that’s how running a business works), is that you’ve got this mix of large tenants and SMEs in your tenant base. 

    And I’m sure both types of tenants will have pros and cons. You’ve already talked to it there. When you sometimes have a large tenant with lumpy occupancy movements, that can create a risk which can also be someone else’s opportunity – like yours, for example. It depends on your ability to actually fill the space.

    So maybe you can just walk us through, from a Sirius perspective, how you think about the mix between large and small tenants. Do you always look to have a little bit of both, or what is the approach?

    Tariq Khader: I think that’s correct. We’d love to have a mix of anchor tenants on site. I think that is key for us. Stable income – a good, strong kind of anchor tenant, or a couple of anchor tenants who provide a large chunk of income. We also like to create these flexible products or high-yielding products, and these are typically where we have a high number of customers. 

    And then you’ve got the gap in between, which is the core SME market. This probably makes up about 50% of our portfolio. So, when you look at Sirius in total, you’ve probably got 40% of our customers are these anchor tenants. You’ve probably got 10% of our customer base, which are these small, flexible customers, high-yielding end. And you’ve got the core business, which is kind of that 50% SME market that we look after. 

    So, I think what we look to do is be a bit more flexible and adaptable. We know the anchor tenant market – that’s long, stable income; strong balance sheets; can weather the storms going through the economy. You’ve got that SME market with not as well-established companies; their balance sheets aren’t as strong. A couple of move-outs in there, you have to then go and get it. 

    And then you’ve got these flexible customers, where you’re turning them in and out as they leave. They don’t create too much risk because they’re so small, but you can really keep moving the price and the yield on those assets. 

    But our approach isn’t fixed. If we get a lot of movement in that core SME market, we can create more of that flexible space to drive the yield. Or if we’re seeing that core SME market become very strong, we can flex the smart space down and have more of that space. So, our approach is adaptable, and there are pros and cons to each. But I think being flexible allows us to kind of take advantage of all the upside there. 

    And lastly, I would say we have over 10,000 customers across Germany and the UK. I think having the right process and systems to be able to efficiently manage a large number of customers in a low-touch way is super important. And that’s part of what we’ve built up over the last 15 or so years, is to be able to manage that volume of customers without it kind of dragging down operations.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah. So it really is all about just looking for that yield uplift as often as you can, managing the risk, etcetera. It’s pretty much as I expected it to be, but it’s also just nice to hear about what life is really like on the ground with this stuff. 

    Keeps you busy, definitely. That’s what I’m hearing here, above all else. Which is not a surprise, because Sirius keeps everyone busy with the number of deals that you guys do, that’s for sure. 

    So we’ve heard from Chris, we’ve heard from Tariq about capital deployment and the types of properties that are being acquired. Andrew, we heard from you earlier about the macroeconomics and some of the mega trends like defence. 

    Let’s talk now about the regional focus, because this is something that always comes out in your announcements when you talk about new acquisitions. You tend to talk about the proximity of the properties, and I’ve always been curious about what these synergies actually are. 

    So maybe you could walk us through the practical stuff (of when the properties are closer together, what the benefit of that is), but also the platforms that you’ve built in these markets?

    Andrew Coombs: Yes, certainly. So, look, I sort of think about the origination of the customer. The first and most basic thing we do is we capture demand, and we disintermediate agents and third parties from that process. 

    So, we don’t want to be talking to someone who’s saying, “You’re one of 10 people in a beauty parade. What can you do for us?” We want to be talking to a potential tenant and saying to them, “Look, we’ve got enough options for you to be so busy considering our options, you don’t want or need to look at anything else.” And in those options, we want to differentiate ourselves by adding points of value that other people don’t or can’t add. 

    And that can be all sorts of things. That can be as simple as a dedicated parking space, or catering in your offices during the day, or dedicated bandwidth that can be operated on a burstable level. So, you don’t need 10 Mbps 20 days a month, you just need 10 Mbps on the last day of the month, but 1 Mbps for the rest of the time. So we charge you 1 Mbps for 19 days, and you burst to 10 Mbps for the 20th, and nobody else can offer you that. 

    But we’re looking at being able to have a direct conversation with a prospective tenant to be able to show them real value, so that what we can do is we can sell our estate at a sensible price – a price that gives them good value, but a price that also gives us a good enough return so that we can invest in the space that they spend time in. 

    Then once they’re in our estate, because our properties are manned (which is, you know, unusual for industrial properties), we can say, “Look, we can focus on running the property so you can run your business.” So, we make sure that the heating is working, the snow’s removed, the wastewater’s taken out, the security on the site is right. We see you every day because we are there.

    What makes that different from everyone else is we’re not an absent landlord that you have to find when something goes wrong. We’re proactive. We’re there every day, and we’re there to make sure the property runs so you can focus on your business.

    And then, of course, we want to understand not just you, but your customer, because we don’t just want to be a supplier. We want to be someone who adds value to your business. So we don’t want to wait for you to say, “Our customers come and visit us, and they need a meeting room with these facilities.” We want to be able to get there before you and make those recommendations. 

    Then when something like Covid hits, we want to be in contact with you – as we were. We’d spotted the risk with Merkel stepping down, and we’d already effectively hedged our gas pricing. So, we were able to supply our customers in manufacturing with gas at pre-war prices all the way through the first two years of the Ukraine conflict. 

    That really just illustrates that point of us understanding your business well enough to understand the kind of risks that we can insulate you from in order to become your partner, rather than just your supplier.

    And then of course, when the time comes for you to either expand, we want to be able to provide you that space, or if it’s leave, we would like to provide you with follow-out-the-door services. Things like virtual offices, where we can forward post, so people can still see you as being based in a location, even though you might have moved to a second city. And we will aim to try and maintain a relationship with you after you have left because we believe, in many cases, there are businesses that, from time to time, will need our services in the evolution of their business. 

    We think that makes us very, very different from your average property company that says, “There’s a contract, we provide the property, there are the keys, give us the money every month. We’ll see you at the end of the lease term.”

    The Finance Ghost: So Chris, let’s bring it back to you then. And we did speak a little bit earlier about your capital raising technique there, of raising with discipline. And when you’ve got a strong pipeline, that’s obviously very much on the equity side. 

    From a debt perspective, I mean, the nature of debt is that it keeps maturing over time. So, you’ve got to manage that maturation as you go. And you’ve also got to then manage a debt-to-equity ratio when you’re raising equity, to make sure that you’re getting the right return on equity. 

    So, it’s a very interesting space. You are definitely the right person to ask this question to. Could you just walk us through the Sirius debt strategy and how you look to optimise your cost of debt versus your balance sheet flexibility?

    Chris Bowman: Yeah, sure. Obviously, you’re absolutely right. The debt strategy is critical to the overall Sirius story. It’s an area which real estate companies can get into trouble with if they’re overly aggressive. And certainly from our perspective, we focus on being conservative with our debt strategy, and we focus on having a long-term approach as well in there.

    At a high level, we have just over €1 billion of debt, which sits alongside the €1.5 billion of equity that we have listed in the stock market. So, we commit to keeping a loan-to-value below 40% despite the fact that our portfolio is actually relatively high-yielding. 

    So on other metrics, such as net debt-to-EBITDA, we’re north of 6x on net debt-to-EBITDA, which is really healthy. So we are very, very conservatively funded, from a balance sheet perspective, in terms of the income and our abilities continue to service that. There are no concerns at all there. 

    That debt stack of just over €1 billion, we then take that and we look at it and we say, “Okay, we want to have a mix of optionality and sources of debt, and we also want to have a mix of term of debt, and we also want to have a mix of both fixed and floating interest rates within there, and different levels of flexibility as well within different types.” 

    So at a high level, we have core debt. We have three bonds outstanding, which are listed institutional rated by credit rating agency, Fitch, at investment-grade-level bonds. They are traded in the markets; they’re owned by institutional investors. And most recently, we issued a bond in January this year for €350 million. We had over €2 billion of demand for that bond, so we’ve got fantastic support from the institutional bond markets to support Sirius. 

    That bond essentially replaces or refinances a bond which comes due in June ’26. So there is no upcoming refinancing on the horizon until November ’28, so we’ve got a very long runway in terms of refinancing window. 

    And again, that comes back to the conservatism. We went out and refinanced that early. We got great support for that. And we have a building relationship and an ever-improving cost of debt in the bond market. Our 2032 bond, for instance, has over six years left to maturity, trades in the market below 4% yield-to-maturity. 

    And then, alongside those bonds, we have strong relationships with some of the specialist real estate bank lenders, particularly in Germany. So, we have just under €250 million outstanding with Berlin Hyp and Deutsche PBB. 

    We also have lending in our JV with AXA. We run a JV on some mature assets with AXA. We have a lending relationship there with Helaba for €150 million. All of those really strong, long-term lending, that secured lending on our balance sheet, is out to 2030. 

    And then alongside that, I put in place a revolving credit facility (which, in simple terms, is really just an overdraft, so that’s real flexibility) for €150 million earlier this year. That is undrawn at the moment, so that is very much flexible. That’s got a five-year term, and that’s priced around 3.5% interest rate as well.

    Net net, our real cost of debt today is somewhere between 3.5% and 4%. We still have one sort of super low-cost bond – the 2028 bond, which is at 1.75% – we need to refinance. But we have to take a journey from a current average cost of debt of 2.5% up to 3.5% to 4% over the coming years. But we can do that while still continuing to grow earnings and FFO. We’ve absolutely got the top-line growth to be more than capable of doing that.

    The Finance Ghost: That ‘always-on’ mentality again, right? It’s not just ‘always-on’ in terms of looking at the macro and everything else; it’s ‘always-on’ in managing the debt. So, maybe that’s the key principle to actually take out of this thing. 

    So, Chris, I’m going to stick with you here because, as we bring this home, I’m keen to understand a little bit more about the growth outlook. And I’m going to ask Andrew just now about the dividend, which I know is a topic he’s passionate about. But first, I’m asking you about the growth outlook. 

    You recently said to the market that the full year’s pretty much in line with management expectations. Now obviously, you can’t disclose anything on this podcast that isn’t already out there in the market, but perhaps you could just take listeners through some of the key drivers of the outlook and what gives you confidence, at the moment, in the numbers that you have put out there?

    Chris Bowman: Yeah, absolutely. So you’re right, we’ve made that statement – and we make that statement, in terms of ‘in line with expectations’ – very much from a position of confidence. And that’s in line with expectations for this year and, as well, for next year looking forwards.

    Now I think, with Sirius, you get growth and you get income. So obviously Andrew will touch on the dividend, but we’re very much focused on growth as well. Because we want to provide that growth in terms of total return to shareholders, but also to be able to pay a growing dividend. 

    So what gives us confidence? We have organic growth. So this is our 12th year in a row now that we are on track to achieve more than 5%, like-for-like rent roll growth. So, that is in an environment where, in Germany, inflation is around 2%, and in the UK, it’s around 3.5%. 

    So, we have consistently more than beaten inflation in the markets in which we operate, and we continue to do that with the strength of our platform and our capital allocation. You’ve heard about acquisitions – we haven’t touched on capex, but that’s key for us as well – but also just the underlying strength of our platforms regionally. That underpins that organic growth. 

    And then on top of that organic growth, we have the acquisition-led growth. Which, again, you’ve heard about how we’ve put €370 million to work in the market this year on acquisitions. You don’t see the full effect of all of that income that’s associated with those acquisitions this year, because a lot of those acquisitions have just happened in months 4, 5, 6, 7, so really, the full effect comes through next year. 

    So, we sit here today, very confident in terms of the outlook for rent roll growth. We have to work hard for that, but we continue to be confident of achieving that – particularly in Germany, with the tailwinds that Andrew’s touched on earlier, but then into future years as well. The combination of that organic growth and that acquisition-led growth gives us great confidence.

    The Finance Ghost: So just to bring it home in this podcast, we know from Sirius’s recent reporting that you’ve essentially baked in around €20 million’s worth of net operating income (NOI) from your recent acquisitions. So, that‘s obviously a nice boost to the numbers coming in the year ahead – and in the years ahead, for that matter. 

    But what does that mean for the dividend, Andrew, which is obviously a big focus for any investor in the space? Obviously, to the extent you can talk about it, it’s just good to give investors an understanding of what they can expect and hope for, in terms of the dividend policy going forward and the sort of numbers you’ve got on your mind.

    Andrew Coombs: Well, look, the dividend’s really close to my heart. It’s close to my heart because I know people in South Africa can invest for dividends, but it’s close to my heart because, in terms of my shareholding, the dividend pays me more than my salary. So, I’m fairly well aligned, where that is concerned. 

    And as you know, it’s Sirius. We always pay a very well-covered dividend, never less than 1.3x. We are now into the 13th year of paying a progressive dividend. And of course, the €370 million of acquisitions that we have now made in this financial year have already generated a forward run rate into next year of €20 million of NOI, but we’re not stopping there. We’re only halfway through the year. 

    We will acquire more than €400 million of new property this year, which is more than the company has ever done before. And we will have baked into next year’s numbers well in excess of €20 million of additional net operating income and FFO that will contribute to the full-year effect next year. 

    And that will mean that our dividend will continue to grow as it has for the last 13 years. It means it will continue to be extremely well covered, and it means that we will continue on our journey towards something they call in the UK ‘dividend aristocracy’. 

    Apparently, if you can deliver, for 25 years, a constantly increasing dividend, that is dividend aristocracy. Well, we are now about to cross the halfway mark in our journey to dividend aristocracy.

    The Finance Ghost: Very impressive goal, indeed. Thank you. It’s a really nice way to just cap it off, talking about dividend aristocracy. And yes, you’re quite right. Many investors in the property space are firmly looking at the dividend. Although certainly from a South African perspective, they like the offshore elements as well. And there are some really good stories there that have been highlighted by not just you, but also the team. 

    So, Andrew, Chris, Tariq. Thank you so much for your time today. Really appreciated having you on the podcast and just bringing this additional layer of detail to the Ghost Mail audience about Sirius Real Estate. And this really has been an excellent resource for anyone looking to do deeper research into Sirius. 

    And of course, this is a listed company on the JSE. You can go and check it out, you can go and find all of the investor relations publications. Go and do the work, do the research, obviously. This is just part of your research process.

    But Andrew, Chris, Tariq – thank you so much for your time. This has been really great. Enjoy the end of the year, and I hope to do another one of these with you.

    Andrew Coombs: Thanks very much, indeed.

    Chris Bowman: Thank you.

    Tariq Khader: Thank you very much.

    Ghost Bites (Accelerate Property Fund | Alexforbes | Equites Property Fund | Fairvest | Hyprop | Lighthouse Properties | Nutun | Remgro | Standard Bank | Tharisa)

    Huge progress was made at Accelerate Property Fund in the past year (JSE: APF)

    The question now is around how much the gap to NAV can still close

    Accelerate Property Fund has been a fun (and profitable) turnaround story to follow. The macro tailwinds have done wonders for them here, giving us an important example of why turnarounds are a much better idea for investors when the broader economy is playing ball. If you need to run into a headwind, you’d better pick a strong athlete. If the property sector is enjoying gusts of wind from behind, then anyone with working legs has a chance.

    Accelerate’s vacancy rate has improved from 21.7% in September 2024 to 15.1% in September 2025, a strong performance over the past 12 months. Much of the good news is obviously at Fourways Mall, with this white elephant slowly becoming a pachyderm of the grey and economically-useful variety.

    The disposal of Portside is expected to take place by the end of December 2025. There are a few other property disposals also expected to close in January 2026. In total, these disposals will reduce debt by R719.1 million, with the disposal of Portside having been the ultimate get-out-of-jail card for Accelerate’s balance sheet.

    When these disposals are concluded, there will be a further decrease in the vacancy rate to 10.3%. The loan-to-value ratio is expected to be 41.8%, a far more palatable number.

    The net asset value per share is R1.86. The share price is currently R0.57, having picked up nicely from the recent rights offer price of R0.40 per share. I’m personally hoping for the stock to get to around 50% of NAV, at which point I’ll probably take profit on this position. So far, so good.


    Alexforbes delivers 9% dividend growth (JSE: AFH)

    The financials aren’t the simplest to read

    It’s always frustrating when a set of numbers is crawling with normalisation adjustments and all kinds of other confusions. Inevitably, the market then skips ahead to the dividend to see what the cash growth was. In this case, Alexforbes reported interim dividend growth of 9% – a far cry from “normalised HEPS” growth of 41%.

    Operating income was up 9% with a decent performance across the segments. Expense growth was only 3% if you’re willing to adjust for various distortions related to long-term incentive plans and leases. If you include those items, expenses were up 10%. Normalised profit from operations was up 18%, while profit without the adjustments was actually down 1%. Sigh.

    Corporate is still the biggest segment, contributing R958 million of the R2.3 billion in total operating income. With growth of 5% in this period, it was a solid underpin to the numbers that was driven by growth in the retirements business.

    The Investments segment is next up at R768 million, with growth of 16% suggesting that it might not be in second place forever. Closing assets under management and administration increased by 23% and blended margins were only slightly lower, so that’s looking good for this business.

    The Retail segment grew operating income by 10%, while “Growth Markets” (their name for operations in certain African and other countries) delivered 6%.

    There’s plenty of corporate gumph in the narrative and not much in the way of hard targets to hang your hat on. There’s an outside chance that the 5.5% drop in the share price on the day was purely from exhaustion in trying to find useful nuggets of information amongst the flowery language in the report. Absolutely nobody wants to read about “navigating the waters ahead” – just give us an outlook statement that includes some numbers!


    Equites brings us the first “unhealthy” REIT capital raise of the cycle (JSE: EQU)

    Blank cheque capital raises with no details are signs of trouble

    After market close on Monday, Equites Property Fund announced an accelerated bookbuild process. This is a way for companies to raise money quickly from institutional investors.

    How much, you ask? No idea.

    Why do they need the money? No idea.

    It’s just: “Hi everyone! We would like some money. Thanks. Kisses.”

    This is proper frothy-market stuff. This approach would get laughed out the door during a weak point in the cycle, but the property market has been on a charge. As I’ve written throughout the cycle, the time to get worried is when the capital raises with a non-existent rationale start happening. This is strike 1.

    Earlier in the day, Equites provided a trading update to at least give the bookrunner something to talk about when phoning institutional investors. They are on track for their full-year guidance of 140 cents – 143 cents per share, so that’s encouraging.

    In terms of corporate news in the trading update, they highlighted a few local development highlights and leases. They also gave an update on the exit from investments in the UK, where they haven’t managed to sell the assets as quickly as they had hoped.

    Do they need money because they have development plans in South Africa that they were hoping to fund with UK exit proceeds that haven’t materialised timeously? In the absence of any other explanation, it sure seems that way.


    Fairvest’s B shareholders enjoy double-digit returns (JSE: FTA | JSE: FTB)

    And more of the same is expected in 2026

    Fairvest has released results for the year ended September 2025. You would be forgiven for getting confused, as the headline for the announcement incorrectly talks about the six months to September instead of a year. Then again, the announcement also talks about the “propsects” for FY26, which is perhaps a new kind of bug. The proofreading was certainly very buggy.

    The numbers in the announcement are hopefully correct, with the property fund achieving revenue growth of 7.1% and like-for-like net property income growth of 5.8%. They delivered dividend growth of 3.1% to the risk-averse holders of Fairvest A shares who get the lesser of 5% or a CPI-linked return. This leaves plenty of meat on the bone for the Fairvest B shareholders who get the residual profits, with growth in their dividend of 11.2%.

    Looking ahead to 2026, the fund expects the B shareholders to enjoy growth of between 9% and 11%. At the mid-point of guidance, that’s another year of double-digit returns to investors. When times are good in the property sector, you would far rather be holding Fairvest B shares than Fairvest A shares:


    Hyprop is on track for FY26 guidance (JSE: HYP)

    Growth in total footcount shows that quality malls do well in an omnichannel environment

    Hyprop released an operational update for the four months to October. The most important news for shareholders is that the group is on track to achieve the targeted growth in distributable income per share of 10% to 12% for the year ending June 2026.

    The fund is well known for owning high quality malls, like Canal Walk in Cape Town. They also aren’t shy to dispose of assets from time to time, as evidenced by the disposal of 50% in Hyde Park Corner (one of the most upmarket malls in Gauteng) for R805 million. They note that they are at advanced stages in concluding another disposal. It will be interesting to see what they are up to.

    These malls are proving to be resilient in an omnichannel environment, with the South African portfolio enjoying growth in footfall of 1.9%. With 43% of the portfolio value in Gauteng and 57% in the Western Cape, Hyprop is focused on attracting shoppers in the country’s economic capitals. The strategy is working, with tenants achieving turnover growth of 5.3% and trading density growth of 8.5%. These strong metrics helped drive vacancies down from 4.2% in June 2025 to 3.2% in October 2025. They are also achieving significant positive reversions.

    Here’s an incredible statistic on the power of a Checkers FreshX store: since the store opened in Hyde Park, the centre has experienced growth in footcount that included 12% year-on-year growth in October 2024! These tenants aren’t known as “anchor tenants” for nothing.

    Hyprop also has exposure to Eastern Europe, with four premier retail centres. They literally have a 0.0% vacancy rate, which is incredible. Tenants enjoyed turnover growth of 2.9% and trading density growth of 3.1%, although footcount is under pressure in that region.

    The balance sheet is in good shape – not least of all thanks to the capital raise of R808 million that ended up being used for debt repayments rather than a deal for MAS (JSE: MSP) – with the loan-to-value ratio increasing slightly from 33.6% in June 2025 to 34.3% in October 2025. Borrowings costs are coming down in the current environment.

    It all looks good for Hyprop, with the share price up more than 20% year-to-date.


    Lighthouse Properties raises guidance (JSE: LTE)

    They are also looking ahead to a strong 2026

    Lighthouse Properties has delivered a pre-close update dealing with the period ending December 2025. The good news is that distribution guidance for 2025 has been revised upwards from 2.70 EUR cents to 2.75 EUR cents. That might not sound like much, but it’s the difference between 5% growth and 7% growth, with the latter providing a particularly appealing premium above inflation (and thus real growth).

    They’ve been busy with acquisitions this year, with net property income for the nine months to September up by a whopping 63.4%. Remember that the distribution on a per-share basis is what really counts, so don’t extrapolate something like growth in total revenue. The pie may be getting bigger, but you need to also consider how many pieces it gets cut into.

    On a like-for-like basis, net property income grew by 5.3%. This is a more sensible metric to look at. Footfall was up 2.8%, with France as the surprising highlight at 3.9%.

    The focus now is on sweating the assets they already have, which means bedding down the acquisitions and looking for further areas of improvement. Although the vacancy rate has increased from 2.0% to 2.6%, this is because of planned vacancies to accommodate new key tenants. They expect vacancies to drop below 2% in 2026 once leases with incoming tenants are finalised. Speaking of leases, positive reversions are a meaty 4.4% excluding regional indexation (inflation increases), so that’s really strong.

    With solid performance across Spain, Portugal and France, Lighthouse expects to deliver a strong 2026. Increasing the guidance for 2025 certainly sends a message!


    Can Nutun return to profits going forwards? (JSE: NTU)

    2025 was another loss-making year, with the group promising that they now have a foundation for growth

    Nutun is the charred remains of what was once a highly successful group: Transaction Capital. With WeBuyCars (JSE: WBC) having been cut loose from that mess and all of the Mobalyz Group (SA Taxi) legacy obligations now sorted out by Nutun, all that is left in Nutun is a business process outsourcing group with local and international operations.

    You would be forgiven for hoping that Nutun is therefore a profitable business, safely protected from the braai coals by a tinfoil wrap. Alas, it hasn’t been quite that simple. The group just reported a continuing core loss of R45 million for the year ended September 2025, which is at least only half as bad as the loss of R92 million in the comparable period.

    The legacy restructuring costs are all behind them now. They’ve got no more exposure to anything to do with Mobalyz, having now created a single point of funding into the South African business with a common security pool across all funders.

    In other words, if 2026 is another loss-making year, then it will be a disaster. Management is bullish about growing off the 2025 foundation. With the share price down 62% year-to-date, I would certainly hope so.


    Remgro wants more of Mediclinic’s SA business (JSE: REM)

    While MSC, Remgro’s co-shareholders in Mediclinic, want Switerland

    You may recall that Remgro partnered with MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company to take Mediclinic private. This was less to do with putting hospitals on cruise ships and more to do with two wealthy families coming together to acquire the Mediclinic group.

    As time has gone on, it seems that Remgro’s partners prefer Swiss exposure to South African exposure. The parties are therefore negotiating a deal that would see Remgro take full ownership of Mediclinic Southern Africa, while the partners would then take full ownership of Hirslanden (the Swiss business). The parties would retain their current joint interests in the Middle East and in Spire Healthcare Group.

    To keep things simple and thanks to relatively similar net asset values across the two geographies, they are looking at a straight swap. This would be based on EV/EBITDA multiples of 6.3x for Mediclinic Southern Africa and 9.4x for Hirslanden. The Swiss business would always carry a higher multiple because of the structurally different cost of capital across the two regions.

    This is only a cautionary announcement, so there’s no guarantee of the deal proceeding on these terms (or on any terms for that matter).


    Standard Bank reaffirms full-year guidance (JSE: SBK)

    A 10-month update shows consistent performance this year

    In an update for the 10 months to 31 October, Standard Bank noted that performance trends are in line with the first 6 months of the year.

    Banking revenue is up by mid-to-high single digits despite lower average interest rates putting some pressure on endowment income. This is too complicated a concept to try explain in one sentence, but I’ll try anyway. It refers to the bank lending out its equity with no associated funding cost, so a drop in interest rates means they earn less on their equity. The thing to remember is that when rates fall, banks experience pressure on their pricing and hence they make less money. To make up for it, they need higher volumes of loans and overall activity. This activity came through in book growth, investment banking deal origination and the non-interest revenue line.

    Revenue growth was ahead of cost growth, so margins are trending in the right direction.

    The credit loss ratio was in the middle of the through-the-cycle range of 70 to 100 basis points. That’s better than we saw at the halfway mark when it was up at 93 basis points.

    Finally, the Insurance and Asset Management business enjoyed a strong performance across life and short-term insurance. It really has been a bumper year for the short-term insurance industry in general.

    The reaffirmed outlook for the year ending December 2025 is revenue growth of mid-to-high single digits, a flat or better cost-to-income ratio vs. the prior period and group return on equity (ROE) in the target range of 17% to 20%.

    In terms of medium-term targets, a capital markets day scheduled for March 2026 will give the market plenty of detail behind the 2028 targets of HEPS growth of 8% to 12% and ROE of between 18% and 22%.


    Tharisa’s SARS victory saved the 2025 numbers (JSE: THA)

    The core mining metrics, like production, are down

    Tharisa released results for the year ended September 2025. They require a more careful read than usual, as there’s a significant adjustment that needs to be dealt with first.

    Tharisa has been in a serious fight with SARS around the calculation of royalty payments for the 2018 to 2021 year of assessment. Tharisa won an important victory in the Tax Court and SARS was set to appeal, but then the parties managed to negotiate a deal where Tharisa wouldn’t pursue costs and SARS wouldn’t appeal. Instead, SARS is now accepting the mining royalty calculations submitted by Tharisa.

    Why is this so important? Here’s why:

    Tharisa has reversed the provision this year, giving a $67.3 million boost to the financials in the cost of sales line. Despite this, EBITDA was only up 5.5% to $187 million. Profit before tax was flat at $117 million. You can quickly see how rough these numbers would’ve been without this adjustment!

    The reason for the disappointing overall performance is that revenue dropped by 16.4%. The PGM business wasn’t the problem, with the favourable pricing environment boosting segmental revenue from $154.5 million to $191.9 million despite a 4.7% decrease in production. Chrome was the issue, with revenue dropping sharply from $491.3 million to $393.3 million as chrome prices fell by 11% and production dropped by 8.2%. When your biggest segment takes a knock like that, it’s rather nasty.

    Although HEPS is only down by 2.1%, the better reflection of the difficult chrome environment can be found in the 33% drop in the dividend for the year. Whenever you see a significant divergence between HEPS and the dividend, you need to go digging. In this case, it’s because of the reversal of the SARS provision.


    Nibbles:

    • Director dealings:
      • Acting through Titan Premier Investments, Christo Wiese bought R14.9 million worth of shares in Brait (JSE: BAT).
      • A non-executive director of Blu Label Unlimited (JSE: BLU) bought shares worth nearly R1.5 million.
      • An associate of a director of South Ocean Holdings (JSE: SOH) bought shares worth R265k.
      • A director of Finbond (JSE: FGL) bought shares worth R120k and an associate of the same director bought shares worth R100k.
      • An associate of a non-executive director of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares worth R152k.
      • An employee of the designated advisor of website-less Visual International (JSE: VIS) sold shares worth R10k.
    • On a day this busy, some of the less liquid stocks simply have to drop into the Nibbles. One such stock is Primeserv (JSE: PMV), where results for the six months to September indicate revenue growth of 5% and a juicy increase in HEPS of 16%. The interim dividend is up 17%. This strong performance despite modest revenue growth was largely thanks to cost control.
    • Thungela (JSE: TGA) has announced the disposal of Goedehoop North for a theoretical maximum of R700 million, although the minimum payment is much lower than that. R50 million in cash is payable initially and the remaining R650 million will be structured as quarterly instalments based on various milestones. The minimum total deferred payment is only R60 million though, so it shows you how much variability there is in that number. Mining operations are expected to cease in 2025 and the net loss before tax for the six months to June was R111 million, so the theory behind this deal is that the infrastructure is far more useful to the buyer than it is to Thungela.
    • In July 2025, South32 (JSE: S32) announced the sale of Cerro Matoso, a ferronickel operation located in Colombia. The deal was structured as a nominal initial payment and future cash payments of up to $100 million, although achieving that number would require a considerable improvement in the nickel market. The latest announcement is that the transaction has been successfully completed.
    • SA Corporate Real Estate (JSE: SAC) announced that the acquisition of the Parks Lifestyle Apartments at Riversands has met all conditions and has a deal closing date of 1 December.
    • Hosken Consolidated Investments (JSE: HCI) announced that the JSE has granted the company a dispensation from the 60-day rule to dispatch a circular to shareholders for the transaction with B-BBEE partner SACTWU. It will be distributed to shareholders as soon as the circular has been approved by the JSE, with no further update given around timing.
    • There’s a change in the CFO role at Pick n Pay (JSE: PIK). Lerena Olivier will step down in August 2026 after the 2026 AGM, having been in the role since 2019 (and with the group since 2011). She will be moving into a strategic role overseeing priority projects related to the turnaround. Tina Rookledge will take the CFO role after the AGM next year, joining the retailer from her current role as Regional Managing Partner of the EY Western Cape practice.
    • Castleview (JSE: CVW), a large property fund with practically zero trade in its stock, released results for the six months to September 2025. The distribution per share increased by 21.8% and the net asset value per share is up 13.4%. The loan-to-value ratio, net of cash, is 45.5%. Much of the recent activity has involved an increase in the stake in SA Corporate Real Estate (JSE: SAC) to 24.93%.
    • Africa Bitcoin Corporation (JSE: BAC) continues to add international trading opportunities for its stock. The company is now trading on the Börse Frankfurt Quotation Board. This doesn’t mean that new shares have been issued or that any capital has been raised. It just means that there’s an additional venue for the trading of shares. They are clearly trying to attract a global audience.
    • Guess what? There’s yet another delay to the payment of funds by Gathoni Muchai Investments Limited (GMI) to Shuka Minerals (JSE: SKA). I can only imagine what the tone on the deal calls must be like by this stage. A promise made by a toddler about not touching an ice cream is more dependable than anything GMI says about the timing of cash flow, so I wouldn’t put much faith in that latest timing update regarding the balance of the £2 million loan facility being paid by mid-December. Remember, the final payment for the acquisition of Leopard Exploration and Mining is due by the end of December.
    • As part of its exit from the JSE, Safari Investments (JSE: SAR) is paying a “clean-out distribution” as described in the circular that was sent out in October. For those who have been wondering what the goodbye kiss will be, the distribution has been calculated as 30.0765 cents per share.
    • Insimbi Industrial Holdings (JSE: ISB) announced that its listing will move to the General Segment of the JSE. We’ve seen many small- and mid-caps take this route, as it gives them a more size-appropriate set of listing rules.
    • Quite why Globe Trade Centre (JSE: GTC) is listed on the JSE, I cannot tell you. The stock literally never trades. For the nine months to September 2025, the Polish property group suffered a loss after tax and a substantial decrease in funds from operations (FFO). The net loan-to-value has increased from 48.8% to 53.1%, dangerously high for a property company.

    Ghost Bites (Crookes Brothers | Mahube Infrastructure | Mantengu | PBT | Premier – RFG | Quantum Foods)

    Low prices for soft commodities impacted Crookes Brothers (JSE: CKS)

    Primary agriculture is a difficult business

    Crookes Brothers is an unusual company on the JSE. This is one of the only ways to get direct access to primary agriculture assets, with Crookes operating in soft commodities like bananas, macadamias and sugar cane. There is unfortunately close to zero liquidity in the stock, so I’m including the numbers in detail here as a learning opportunity about the sector rather than because the company is practically investable.

    For the six months to September 2025, revenue fell by 5% and operating profit before biological assets was down 21%. Lower commodity prices were largely to blame, along with other issues like storms at the banana plantations. The macadamia business is still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s storm that severely affected yields. If you think that primary agriculture is an easy sector, you are sorely mistaken.

    HEPS fell by 44% per share as operating profits decreased across all major segments. The silver lining is that cash from operations only fell by 5%, so the impact on the balance sheet was less severe than the HEPS number might suggest.


    Mahube Infrastructure brings us an unusual sight: negative revenue (JSE: MHB)

    Fair value movements are recognised in revenue for them

    Seeing negative revenue in a set of financials is very rare. It can happen though, as proven by renewable energy investor Mahube Infrastructure.

    Dividend income was down from R13 million to R11.1 million, with negative R19.9 million fair value adjustments then pulling revenue into the red. Such is life as a company using investment entity accounting.

    The market tends to focus on the movement in net asset value (NAV) per share in these types of companies, with Mahube’s NAV decreasing by 7% to R10.25. The negative fair value moves affect this directly.

    This is a good reminder that even if wind farms and huge solar PV projects look great on presentations and corporate websites, that isn’t a guarantee that they will be financially lucrative. These assets come with risk and volatile earnings, just like every other asset.

    Still, Mahube’s share price is up by 43% year-to-date, so sentiment is much better than these numbers would suggest!


    Can Mantengu get it together in the next six months? (JSE: MTU)

    The GEM facility is a key funding line, but would be painful for investors

    I was actually left alone after writing about Mantengu’s trading statement, so perhaps the management team has finally decided to go chase ghosts elsewhere. This allows me to do my job in peace, just like I do with every single other SENS announcement on the JSE. Long may it last, as recent online interactions have unfortunately done nothing to build investor confidence in this company.

    And investor confidence is exactly what they need, along with a sprinkling of hope.

    Mantengu kicked off the results with a note that revenue increased by 109% (i.e. more than doubled), but a big chunk of this is the silicone carbide acquisition. As with every company that has been making acquisitions, you need to be careful of how this distorts the percentage change in total revenue growth. We therefore need to look deeper to understand these numbers.

    Another thing to keep in mind is that there’s a seasonal element to the business based on the current portfolio of assets. The silicone carbide business generated substantial losses in this period after being shut down for maintenance in the winter months to avoid Eskom’s highest tariffs. If it’s going to have a “bad winter” every year, then the interim results would always be worse than the full-year numbers.

    In the chrome business, currently the most important place to look, revenue of R142 million was up 23% year-on-year. This is the highlight of the numbers, although I must point out that this is a slowdown from the second half of FY25 where they generated R162.2 million in chrome revenue. The reason for this is outside of their control: there was significant flooding earlier this year that reduced access to the chrome pits in those months. In an effort to look at the bright side, the company notes that they’ve stored lots of water as a result and haven’t had to rely on municipal water during this period!

    The flooding surely didn’t help the numbers, but the chrome business was actually profitable at EBITDA level (R14.4 million). After depreciation of R27.8 million, this segment fell to an operating loss of R13.4 million. Once you add on the operating loss of R38.7 million in silicone carbide and then the corporate costs as well, you get to a group operating loss of R54.6 million. That’s a nasty outcome vs. the operating profit of R24.3 million in the prior period, putting them firmly in the red on a two-year stack.

    It gets worse when you look at the cash flow statement. Mantengu ate its way through R108 million in cash from operating activities – a concerning trend compared to positive cash from operations of R13.6 million in the comparable period.

    There’s a lot of underlying noise in these numbers related to exact timing of acquisitions, but the underlying message here is one of a company that has had a disappointing financial period at a time when there is a great deal of other stuff going on around the group. What they really needed was a set of strong numbers to dispel the critics. Instead, they had various unfortunate operating challenges, including Langpan’s contracted off-taker exercising an option to buy chrome concentrate at a lower price vs. the market.

    One of the basic things you are taught in finance at university is to look out for a situation where current liabilities exceed current assets. This is unfortunately the case at Mantengu. One of the debts that is cause for concern is R65.8 million that is repayable to Fedgroup Private Capital in February 2026. They would surely need to refinance this, as I can’t see how they would generate enough operating cash to repay it in time. This refinancing will hopefully be achieved with debt, but there’s also risk of them needing to tap into the GEM facility and issue shares at a potentially very low share price (down 30% year-to-date).

    Despite a cash balance of just R5.2 million and the situation with current liabilities, the directors are confident about the going concern status. They specifically highlight the GEM facility as a key funding line, reinforcing the risk of dilution for investors.

    Could they trade their way out of the dilution risk? There’s all to play for in the second half of the year, with the commissioning of Langpan’s second chrome wash plant expected in the coming days (and fully funded from operating cash flows). Blue Ridge is due to enter full production in the first half of calendar year 2026.

    I must also highlight a further concern for investors: a significant uptick in executive remuneration despite the underlying financial performance. Bearing in mind that this company has swung from HEPS of 2 cents to a headline loss per share of 27 cents, we’ve seen a significant jump in the annualised salaries of both the CEO and the CFO based on the disclosure in the report. There were also cash bonuses in this period, as well as significant share awards at a time when the share price is under pressure.

    If management wants to improve confidence in their story in the market, they should probably start by buying their own shares now that closed period is behind them. There’s literally no better way to tell the market that the shares are undervalued.

    In a separate announcement, Mantengu has withdrawn the cautionary related to the acquisition of a stake in Kilken Platinum. They have terminated the due diligence and the transaction. Even without all the underlying noise, it sounds pretty sensible that they should focus on their existing operations and getting the balance sheet into a healthier position before they take on any new risks.


    A much better period for PBT Holdings (JSE: PBT)

    Double-digit growth in earnings is never a bad thing

    PBT Holdings released results for the six months to September that tell a better story than what we’ve been seeing recently. After navigating the difficult normalisation of demand for services in the post-pandemic period, the group has found a way to achieve a meaningful uplift in profits.

    The reference to “profits” is deliberate, as revenue isn’t where you’ll find the excitement. Revenue was up just 3.4%, yet that was enough for EBITDA to climb 12.3% and normalised HEPS to increase by 15.0%. If you look at HEPS as reported instead of normalised HEPS, the increase is 21.8%. It’s always encouraging when the normalised view leads to lower growth rather than higher growth, as this tells you something about the management team’s respect for the market and a desire to tell a balanced story.

    This approach isn’t really news to anyone though, as PBT Holdings stands out as having some of the most detailed disclosure on the JSE in terms of the key operating drivers of its business. You’ll very rarely see disclosure like this from any listed company, let alone a sub-R1 billion market cap player:

    For a measure of cash earnings, you can look at the 11.1% increase in the dividend. That’s not quite as good as the HEPS growth, but still a solid outcome. Cash generated from operations increased by 8%, with timing of working capital flows affecting this percentage growth vs. the underlying increase in earnings.

    The share price is up 28% year-to-date and comes with a juicy dividend yield as well, so shareholders have been rewarded well in 2025. The view over three years is far less encouraging, but that’s what happens when people buy shares at stretched valuations. To keep this momentum going, the market will look for stronger revenue growth, not just an improvement in profits.


    Premier updated the pro forma numbers for the RFG Holdings deal (JSE: PMR | JSE: RFG)

    This is because both companies recently released updated results

    When JSE-listed companies release circulars, they need to include the most recently reported numbers. The timing of a deal sometimes works out very well, with fresh public numbers available for the circular and no updates required along the way. But in other deals, the circular goes out with rather stale numbers that were released several months ago. If the next round of financial reporting takes place while the circular is still “live” (i.e. during the timeline for shareholder approval), then it is often necessary to update the circular with the latest available numbers.

    This is what has happened in the PremierRFG Holdings transaction, with both companies having recently released numbers. Premier has therefore released updated pro forma numbers to show what the impact on Premier shareholders would be if the deal goes ahead.

    This is just a maths exercise to plug together two sets of financials, make a few adjustments and then work out how many shares would be in issue. It doesn’t tell you anything about what the future performance might be, so just keep that in mind as you read this.

    The overall message is that diluted HEPS would improve by 10%. This speaks directly to the relative valuations of the two companies under the terms of the deal.


    Quantum Foods signs off on a much stronger year (JSE: QFH)

    The CFO describes it as “one of the best profit performances since unbundling from Pioneer Foods just over ten years ago”

    When poultry businesses do well, they can do really well. Naturally, this means that when things go badly, they go very badly. If you crave a boring life, you’re better off eating chickens than investing in them.

    For the year ended September, revenue at Quantum Foods was up by 12.9% and operating profit jumped by 55.3%. HEPS increased by 67.1%. There’s even a dividend of 34 cents per share vs. nil in the comparable period. Sure, they are only paying out 25% of HEPS as a dividend, but it’s still a sign of confidence.

    The broiler and layer farming business is where you’ll find the biggest swing, with revenue up just 8.5% and profits moving sharply from negative R11 million to positive R127 million. As a reminder that the moves sometimes make even less sense, the eggs business saw revenue jump by 47% and profits decrease by 20.8%. Margins in poultry tend to be volatile, so the revenue vs. profit movements can sometimes get rather wild. They can also be tame, as we’ve seen in the animal feeds segment where revenue was up 5.6% and adjusted operating profit was up 9.6%.

    Operations in the rest of Africa saw a 16.5% increase in revenue, but a 6.7% drop in adjusted operating profit. You’ll find the usual ups and downs from operating in frontier markets, with Mozambique deserving a special mention for adding looting to the list of risks!

    From a cashflow perspective, cash from operations was up by 14.2% to R302 million. The reason for the gap between this growth rate and operating profit growth is the investment in working capital, with a significant portion of the incremental profits landing in inventory.

    Despite this strong set of numbers, the share price is flat year-to-date after a rollercoaster ride of note.


    Nibbles:

    • Director dealings:
      • An associate of one of the co-CEOs of iOCO (JSE: IOC) bought shares worth R1.3 million.
      • A director of a major subsidiary of Blu Label (JSE: BLU) sold shares worth R1.1 million.
      • A director of Momentum (JSE: MTM) bought shares worth R180k.
      • An associate of the CEO of Grand Parade (JSE: GPL) bought shares worth R42.4k.
    • Curro (JSE: COH) announced that the Competition Commission has recommended the approval of the acquisition by the Jannie Mouton Stigting, subject to certain conditions. The next step would be for the deal to go to the Competition Tribunal, provided that the parties are willing to live with the conditions. It seems that the conditions aren’t a slam dunk, with the company noting that the offeror will provide an update next week on the acceptability of the conditions. Hopefully we aren’t being taken on a journey to crazy town by the regulator on this one.
    • Jubilee Metals (JSE: JBL) announced a co-operation and project development agreement with Galileo Resources for the development of Jubilee’s Molefe Mine in Zambia. Galileo would be able to earn up to a 23.75% stake in the Molefe Mine, with 5% to be held by a local Zambian firm and the remaining 71.25% held by Jubilee Metals. Galileo would need to fund $700k towards exploration and development. They would also provide the skills needed to put the mine on an accelerated development path, with the stake in the mine earned by Galileo through completing an agreed scope of work within eight months.
    • It’s time to bid farewell to Ascendis (JSE: ASC) after a long and mostly painful journey as a JSE-listed company. The offer to shareholders was successful, achieving acceptances of 6.86% of the offer shares. This offer was unusual in that it had a maximum acceptance condition, so a low acceptance rate is what they were looking for! The shares will be delisted on 4th December.
    • Here’s some good news for Goldrush (JSE: GRSP): the court has dismissed an application by Ithuba Lottery to urgently interdict the implementation of the award of the National Lottery licence to Sizekhaya, the winning bidder in which Goldrush is invested. The application was even dismissed with costs! This only deals with the urgent interdict, with the full review application likely to be heard in 2026.
    • The chess pieces continue to move at RMB Holdings (JSE: RMH), with well-known shareholder activist Albie Cilliers resigning from the board of Atterbury Property Holdings where he served as an RMH representative. As you may recall, the company is trading under cautionary based on a potential offer by Atterbury for RMH.
    • I ignore most non-executive director appointments on the JSE, but here’s one that is worth highlighting: STADIO (JSE: SDO) announced that Capitec (JSE: CPI) founder Gerrie Fourie has joined the education group’s board after retiring from the bank a few months ago. STADIO is having an extraordinary year, with the share price up more than 82% year-to-date!
    • ASP Isotopes (JSE: ISO) has established a new Photonics Chair at Wits University through an endowment under a three-year donation agreement. Dr. Angela Dudley will take on that new role. They are looking to not just drive further research in photonics, but produce a pipeline of students who might work at ASP Isotopes after their studies. This looks like a great example of investing in local talent and building a link between commercial applications and academic pursuits.
    • The share register of Castleview Property Fund (JSE: CVW) is so tightly held that there is literally no liquidity in this stock. In a trading statement for the six months to September 2025, the fund confirmed that the dividend per share is 11.07 cents, up 21.8%. I’m sure that the small group of investors will be happy with that!
    • Salungano (JSE: SLG) is suspended from trading and thus has to release quarterly updates to shareholders. They still have a bunch of issues to sort out, ranging from the financial reporting backlog through to bigger worries around the going concern status and the extent to which a recently announced coal supply agreement with Eskom might address this. The company’s best estimate is that the suspension may be lifted in April 2026.

    Ghost Stories #85: Why DIY investing and advice belong together

    Listen to the show using this podcast player:

    DIY investing is all the rage and certainly has a place in the market, but so does financial advice. As a new generation of investors power through the market and look to build on the knowledge and wealth gained in recent years, there’s an opportunity to pause and consider whether it wouldn’t be better to do this with a broader financial plan in place. After all, you might love decorating a home, but wouldn’t you still use an architect to design it properly?

    Drawing on the benefits of DIY investing and financial planning leads to a best-of-both-worlds approach. You can have fun with investing and do so with the safety of guardrails provided by a proper financial plan. Kapil Joshi, Managing Director: Strategy and Proposition at Momentum Wealth, joined me on this podcast to talk about how these worlds should co-exist for investors who want to take a more active approach to their wealth creation.

    Momentum Wealth is part of Momentum Investments and Momentum Group Limited. Momentum Wealth (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider (registration number 1995/008800/07, FSP number 657). Momentum Metropolitan Life Limited is an authorised financial services and credit provider (registration number 1904/002186/06, FSP number 6406).

    You can connect with Kapil on LinkedIn here.

    Full Transcript:

    The Finance Ghost: Welcome to this episode of the Ghost Stories podcast. It’s been a long time coming. A very busy man to pin down to get on this show, but I think it’s going to be worth it because we have some very cool stuff that we are going to be speaking about. 

    My guest on this podcast is Kapil Joshi. He is the Managing Director of Momentum Wealth Management. That’s why he’s so hard to pin down – because he’s doing so much cool stuff. Kapil, thank you so much for making the time to be on the show. 

    We are going to have a really fun chat about not just the rise of DIY investing, but also the broader framework in which that is happening and how people should think about getting a financial advisor involved, where they need to potentially get that expert help, where they can maybe do some of it themselves. 

    I think this is a very important discussion obviously with where the world has gone, and of particular relevance to the Ghost Mail audience, which is filled to the brim with DIY investors. So, Kapil, thank you so much. It’s lovely to have you on the show.

    Kapil Joshi: Thanks, Ghost, it’s an absolutely wonderful honour and a privilege to be here with you. I agree – lovely subject that we’re talking about, the rise of DIY investing. Looking forward to sharing some thoughts and insights the way we see it from Momentum Wealth. 

    Having said that, I just want to really get it off my chest: we do believe in financial advice, but we will continue to speak about it in a way that helps your audience to understand the nuances and where we believe DIY investing can be beneficial as well. Great to be here and looking forward to the chat.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, absolutely. To be clear, I think financial advice is absolutely key and that’s exactly why we’re doing this. I’ve said it on many a podcast, not just this one: it’s so important to recognise that you wouldn’t go and play professional sport without a coach. You wouldn’t necessarily go and have great success at the gym unless you do the research and maybe get a personal trainer involved, etcetera, etcetera. Why should it really be any different with your money? It can just help you so much and we’re going to talk about some of that stuff today. 

    What might be a nice way to understand it is if we use the analogy of someone furnishing their house. Bear with me. You may well have great taste and you might be willing to do the research yourself on where to get fantastic furniture at the best price and everything else (I’m very lucky that my fiancé is amazing with that, so maybe that’s a very personal example), but we wouldn’t build the house ourselves. We might choose the furniture, but we’re not going to go and build the house ourselves. 

    A lot of people might say, “Wow, this is not for me. Let me rather get some help on how to furnish a home.” This is why interior designers exist. It’s not that different when it comes to financial advice, right? It’s about understanding where your talents lie, where you want to apply your own time – and your time comes at a cost, it’s not for free. 

    DIY investing doesn’t mean you went and looked at 10 stocks, threw darts, hit some, and everything went well (that happens very rarely in an extremely bullish market).  DIY investing means doing the work. That’s the trade-off that people need to use. What are your thoughts on that analogy – do you think that’s a pretty accurate reflection?

    Kapil Joshi: I think you’ve used a brilliant analogy to describe the fusing of doing it yourself versus the role of advice in the context of your housebuilding example, so let’s keep it there. 

    If you think about the role of an architect or an interior designer – depending on which one you use when you’re building a house – you might not need all of the services of either of those individuals, but at different points there are questions you might have. There are technicalities around whether this suits the way the house is being built and the context of that process. So in that regard, the roles of financial advice often provide similar nuggets at different points in your investment or savings journey that are important to take into account. 

    With the analogy of building a house, let me go to myself: I am not an architect by trade and I don’t have any clue from a creative perspective how to set up any room in the house. I don’t think we have that skill,  so in my case I’m definitely…

    The Finance Ghost: See, it’s good to know these things!

    Kapil Joshi: …going to be outsourcing that. And why it’s important is because you care about the end result. You know what you’re trying to do – when you build a house, there’s a goal in mind. There’s a point at which it might just be you and your wife, it might be to establish something for your family. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that the roof over your head services the various needs that you have in a way that meets your standards, in a way that also talks to your wants and desires in terms of the things that you have. 

    Take a guy – obviously our man caves are important to us! Having a setup that allows you to have your PlayStation close by, a big TV, and to ensure your mates are catered for when you have them over – it’s important. In a similar way, I think of financial advice in exactly that context. 

    But I think it’s important that we recognise that there is a place sometimes for doing things yourself. I’m a firm believer in the investment analogy (it’s well-used in our industry) that says there is no better time to start saving or investing than now. So the opportunity to just do so and get those building blocks in place for a longer-term investment journey is the most important requirement in a process like this. But at the same time, if you start to think about when things get more complex (and I’ll give you many examples of that as we talk) then the role of financial advice becomes more material. 

    I like your previous example where you spoke about the role of a coach when you go to something like a gym. Think of a financial advisor in the same way – they are there to put the guardrails in place to prevent bad behaviour that all of us have. 

    I just want to quote a stat that we’ve seen in a recent study done at Momentum which is: those clients that have financial advisors end up having 9.5x more investment value attributed to the investment. Which actually once again just demonstrates the value – the tangible benefit – that financial advisors give to clients in navigating what is often not just a once-in-a-year kind of exercise, but through the lifetime of any individual client and their family.

    The Finance Ghost: Kapil, I’m so jealous of you talking about PlayStation rooms, dedicated mates rooms. You must be up in Joburg, because in Cape Town (as we all know) everyone has to sleep above their toilet basically in these homes that are like a third of the size of Joburg for 10x the cost. But such is life. At least we have a pretty view and a nice mountain, so we go with it. Semigration – people are chasing that and continue to chase it, although that is slowing down a bit. That’s been one of the trends in South Africa in recent years. 

    Another trend of course has been DIY investing and it really has been something to behold as this has come on stream. Low interest rates during the pandemic really helped. I mean, I saw it firsthand. I started this business five-and-a-half years ago, way more by luck than design. It sounds like genius-level stuff that I picked this time where everyone was interested in markets, etcetera, etcetera – I just got very lucky, I’ll be honest, and responded to the opportunity that was there to then accelerate it and really grab it. It was amazing to see just the amount of interest in stocks all of a sudden. 

    Sasol was the classic one. All the professional investors were saying, “No, don’t touch Sasol.” And for good reason. New retail investors went, “Not a chance! This is Sasol, they’re not going anywhere. I’m going to dive into this thing.” And then Sasol went bananas. People who sold made a lot of money and those who didn’t sell have ridden it all the way back down. 

    So, DIY investing – I think it is a fantastic hobby, I really do, because there are so few hobbies that pay you. How many hobbies do you know that make you money as opposed to cost you money? I can speak to my own hobbies here: they definitely don’t make me money. So, I’m always very encouraged by people who say, “You know what? I want to take some of my money and I’d like to go and learn to invest. I want to read the company reports, I want to follow the news. This is something I’m interested in.” I think that’s such healthy, just excellent financial behaviour. 

    But even then, even doing it in that healthy way, you’ve got to have this broader plan. You’ll have some good views for us here on how you mitigate some of these risks. You’ve touched on one or two of the values that a financial advisor can bring and that “coaching” kind of mentality. I’m keen to see some further thoughts from you around that. 

    I guess the most damaging kind of behaviour would be people who almost treat it as gambling. They’re not really thinking, “This is a hobby where I’m going to go and learn the markets.” It’s just, “Let me throw some money at the markets and away we go.” Almost like the sports betting surge that we’re seeing in South Africa. So, let’s dig into this a little bit more. Just the way that this all works together, this whole ecosystem – what are your thoughts on that?

    Kapil Joshi: So, let me just say: yes, I am from Joburg. That’s the first answer. You made an assumption, but I am from Joburg.

    The Finance Ghost: You and your PlayStation room. Amazing.

    Kapil Joshi: And swapping out the mountain means we need to find other forms of entertainment, right?

    The Finance Ghost: 100%. I grew up there, I know. I can visualise that room!

    Kapil Joshi: Let’s just get that out of the way. Back to DIY investing. Before we talk about financial advice again, let’s just go back to what DIY investing really is. The idea of doing it yourself and beginning to invest in the way that you described (and, using your Sasol example, I agree wholeheartedly with you in terms of the benefits of that and the financial behaviour displayed by customers) – where does it come from? 

    We live in a world right now where (from a generational perspective) we’re seeing a much younger audience that is starting to have curiosity about the idea of investing and saving, given that they know of its importance. Obviously they’re studying about it a bit earlier on in their secondary and tertiary education in a way that at least puts the question top of mind for younger audiences. 

    Why I also think that’s relevant (not to say that it’s only for younger audiences) is that the rise of technology means investments and savings are much more accessible than they’ve ever been in the past. Now, if you think about the typical retail shopping experience online – it’s the one-click experience, it’s understanding your individual requirements and nudging you towards the things that you purchased in the past, and so on. Investment processes are starting to establish the same. You can see why there is a rise, then, in the do-it-yourself mentality in individuals’ investments and savings. 

    And I’m going to echo what I said earlier – I’m all for that. I actually think it’s great that we have more people investing and saving because the means have obviously been made a lot easier, in terms of getting access to it. But at what point does doing it yourself start to be fraught with some risks? The perils of just trying to chase market performance? 

    You used Sasol. I think Bitcoin is another great example that we see, perhaps less of an investment hypothesis – I think it’s important that we recognise where the capability is. But at the same time, I think it demonstrates the speculative nature and the dangerous behaviour that certain asset classes or certain investment types can present you with. Just chasing the next best return is probably the worst thing that individual clients and customers can do for themselves because ultimately, at some point, you’re not going to be able to get it right. 

    This is not about investment jargon, this is not about the technicalities – I don’t want to hide our industry behind those things. But there are professionals and experts that look at this on a daily basis, that understand the different elements, and this is where I want to bring it back to the role of financial advice. 

    So, very basic investment terminology would suggest that if the one-click experience looks like buying something like tax-free savings products that are invested in eight or nine funds only, I think doing it yourself is okay. I think it’s reasonable to expect that that is the case. 

    But as time horizons increase beyond the short term, let’s say beyond 3 years plus. As your different needs, wants and desires from an investments’ perspective take shape. As you look to perhaps get married and start to fund your kids’ education either locally or globally, or you start to plan your own personal retirement – that’s where the investment opportunity set becomes much wider. Now we start to talk about – in the platform world – the language of product wrappers (that’s really just code for whether it’s a retirement annuity, an endowment, or a tax-free savings product). So, already you open up product selection opportunities. 

    At the next level, you start to open up investment component opportunities. This expands beyond 2,000 to 3,000 funds in the local market alone – if you think globally, that is well in excess of 15,000 different investment components. How are you expected to navigate choice as an individual and make the right decisions as soon as we move into the space? 

    In summary, I believe in the idea of DIY investing to get yourself going, but at some point it becomes too complex to be able to manage by yourself. That is the point at which it’s the perfect opportunity to engage with a financial advisor of some sort. 

    To be able to not only help you navigate the complexity, but (going back to my previous sentiments about them also representing themselves as coaches) also help you navigate any bad behaviour that you might have as a customer or a client when it comes to the “switch itch”, or chasing market performance, or even ensuring that you have your holistic plan well articulated and that you’re tracking yourself against that plan. That’s the role of the financial coach in this particular journey. I hope that helps.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, look, there’s a lot of good stuff coming through there. Words like “curiosity” are exactly right – that’s something that drives a lot of people’s interest in the market and their initial steps into it. The one thing then (or just the way the entire ecosystem works, it is what it is) is the type of content that people latch onto. I know this from experience: they want to read about stocks, right? That’s the exciting thing. “Tell me about Sasol. Tell me about Anglo American. Tell me about this interesting mid-cap that I’ve actually never heard of and know almost nothing about.” 

    And that’s all fine as long as you engage that content in a very healthy way and you’re getting it from the right sources. And there are many – I like to think I’m one of them, but there are many. 

    But the wrong source would be your typical case of someone who suddenly wakes up and they’re a TikTok financial influencer and they have some great views on “5 Hot Stocks”. This person has never been in a professional investment firm or a boardroom in their lives – what do they know about picking stocks, actually? And they come and they go. 

    There were so many who arrived during COVID because it’s just that response of “What’s going on in the market? Oh, people are interested in this content. Let me create this content.” Today I’m a stock expert. During the Cape Town drought, these same people were borehole experts – it’s just that kind of mentality. 

    So, you’ve got to be super careful about where you get your content. And there are a lot of really, really good places. I think if you engage with the right quality content around stocks, you’ll quickly see that it’s not easy – and that’s the point. There’s a reason why a small percentage of active fund managers beat the market over time. A very small percentage. And these are pros doing it all the time. So, I would rather look at it and say, “Look, it is very hard. And that challenge is part of the appeal.” 

    The cool thing is that if you do the DIY investing with some really good guardrails around your broader financial plan, then (even if you underperform the market) what you’ve really done is taken a portion of almost a hobby budget and said, “Okay, let me invest it.” It’s almost in excess of the minimum you should be putting away that your financial advisor would help you identify. 

    And then – I don’t want to say it doesn’t matter how that money does, but it kind of doesn’t matter. Because (if you’re saving enough and you’ve got those guardrails in place), if you have a really bad year with your DIY pot and you learn from it, then yes, you lost some money – but you would have spent that money on something else anyway. At least now you’ve given yourself a chance for it to actually go up. And you know in the back of your mind that everything’s going to be okay because, long term, my plan is fine, I’m putting money away in the right vehicles. And I guess that also just unlocks the ability to then have a healthy relationship with your DIY investing. 

    So it’s the same way I manage my hobby budget every month: I spend money on my hobbies, but I know how much I can spend and so I can spend it with zero guilt because I’ve figured it out. I don’t even second-guess. It’s like, “This is what I can spend every month – done.” I think that’s quite a healthy way to understand your DIY investing.

    And that’s a big role of the advisor, right? To help you with these guardrails.

    Kapil Joshi: Yeah, I think you used a key word for me in your description now, Ghost, and that is “budget”. I want to latch onto that as perhaps something that often gets overlooked in the journey that we are talking about today. 

    The idea of having a budget in the first place is something many people struggle with. In fact, the stats indicate that half of the South African population, from a propensity and affordability perspective (obviously there are good reasons for it) don’t have a budget. And what we’re speaking about for today’s subject is critically identifying some of the gaps that need to be closed as well. 

    So, even before a financial advisor can come into the picture, having a budget is such a key thing and a key component because what it says is: at the end of the month, when you get your salary, how much of that net salary goes towards different things that need to be funded in the household? Or for the different aspects of serving your family’s needs (if you do have a family)? 

    And what’s important to highlight in that process is that there is often very little left that ends up being utilised for probably the wrong things in the first place. You call it a hobby budget. Hobbies are great, and I think if you extend those hobbies into learning and sparking curiosity into different fields and so on: awesome. But at the same time, it’s important that we try and look at the opportunity to stretch rands as far as they can be stretched. 

    This is where the idea of having a budget and ensuring that you can have X amount of money set aside at the end of every month for even the opportunity to go the route of doing it yourself from an investment perspective – the stocks that you have an inkling to, or the unit trust manager that you might align to in terms of philosophy and/or style, or whatever the case might be – at least you have the opportunity, then, to start to participate in market growth. Now, we’re not even in the space of trying to meet inflationary objectives that you might set for yourself in terms of that investment, but at least you’re putting money away. So I think that’s an important dimension. 

    The second element that I want to call out in terms of this is what you spoke about: the role of finfluencers and getting stock tips or bad advice from the wrong sources. I do believe that these new individuals, via social media, have a role to play in sparking interest and curiosity (going back to our earlier points). But at the same time, it’s important that you recognise that your personal requirements, your personal needs, are unique to yourself. Not everything you hear or see on social media or via the next best finfluencer on TikTok is going to be right for your circumstances and for your needs. 

    This is where I think it’s important to bring in the idea of something like a risk profile, which is a good example of what a financial advisor would do for you in a set of circumstances like we’re talking about. And that is to identify your propensity to be either risk-averse or risk-taking – in the nature of who you are as an individual, behaviourally. Once a financial advisor follows something like a risk-profiling process, they identify what your risk is as an individual and your ability to choose or match appropriate products and appropriate solutions to then meet that risk profile – that is one function that a financial advisor would play to ensure that you are in the right place. 

    That’s such an important example to illustrate the idea not only of the importance of your personal needs, but also of (once your personal needs are understood) matching that to an appropriate individual like a financial advisor that can help you to ensure that you are in the right place for your personal circumstances and for your risk profile. That’s a great example of illustrating why not to just listen to the next best finfluencer. 

    And by the way, Ghost, I think your content is amazing. I’m sure that many individuals are taking a lot of lessons learned, at least from your podcast – which is real and also illustrates what the financial industry is about.

    The Finance Ghost: Thank you, that’s very kind. I wanted to touch on something you said there which is really important: that a holding that’s good for one person is not necessarily good for the next person. That is exactly why – and I’ve been asked to do this a million times before – that is the real reason why I don’t publish what I hold. 

    Because I know that even if I publish 98 pages of disclaimers next to it and remind people in big red writing (although it would probably be purple) to go and get a financial advisor or to do their own research, I know what’s going to happen. It’s going to be, “Oh, this guy owns these stocks. I like his writing, I’m going to own them too.” And it’s very flattering, but it’s also completely wrong. I own them for a specific reason, in a specific proportion, with specific reference to other stuff I have. I’m not going to disclose how much I have in fixed income savings, business savings, etcetera, etcetera. There’s a whole balance sheet that I’m managing. And that is exactly why I do not publish: “Oh, I hold all of these things.” 

    It’s also why when I write in Ghost Bites – and someone asked me this on X literally just the other day, which I thought was a great question. He said, “Do you always disclose where you have a holding?” My answer was, “I always disclose it where I give a strong view on a stock.” 

    For example, I’ve been very vocal on something like Prosus this year, because I bought it right at the beginning of the year, I disclosed that at the time and I’ve tried to walk people through that journey because, at the end of the day, Ghost Mail is really just my notebook on my own market activities. It’s just that a lot of people like to read it, which is great. And then we get to do cool podcasts like these, which is fantastic. But I’m always scared that a company comes out with an almost non-event piece of news and it’s just one of my portfolio positions for the long term and now I say, “Yeah, I have this stock.” What do people do with that information? 

    That definitely doesn’t mean, “Oh, it’s necessarily a great buy right now.” It just means, “I have it right now.” That’s not the same thing at all. So, that’s the difficulty and where I personally get very nervous when I see very hardcore stock picking-focused social platforms. There are one or two really good ones – there are some really, really good bloggers out there who are particularly excellent at that – but on the whole it’s just not good. 

    And you never hear about these people’s losses, right? That’s the other thing we have to be super careful with when it comes to social media content. There are a handful of people who are willing to say, “Actually, I got this one horribly wrong.” I always do it – if I’ve lost money on something, you’ll never see me backtrack and say, “Oh, no, I never had this stock.” No, we all make mistakes. There’s no world in which you get 100% of them right. Any good trader will tell you that, actually.

    So, again: it’s about healthy engagement with content. And I think having a voice of wisdom, like a financial advisor alongside you in this journey, just helps you so much with this. Because every decision you take in the market is an active decision. You touched on tax-free savings earlier and putting it in a spread of ETFs and everything (which is something absolutely everyone should do – max their tax-free savings every year). But what do you buy? How do you choose? The underlying ETFs might be passive, but the decision of which one to buy is active. The decision to do tax-free savings is an active one, where you need to take into account your liquidity and everything else. 

    So there are all these little active decisions. Some of the underlying end stuff might be passive, but everything else is active. And that’s why getting an advisor helps you. It helps you with understanding this stuff, right?

    Kapil Joshi: Yes, 100%. Just a few concepts to call out in what you were just describing. The first one is sentiment-based investing, which is probably the worst thing one can do. So, just listening to what works and what’s winning in the market (once again, going back to what I said earlier) might not be right for your personal circumstances. I’m just going to emphasise that point once again. And that’s this whole idea about taking what you hear and what you read and putting that down for yourself – that’s effectively called sentiment-based investing, which is where, once again, the role of financial advice comes in. 

    The other one that I want to call out (which isn’t something that you specifically spoke to, but is important in the context of what we are discussing) is diversification. It’s not something I think we’ve actually alluded to so far. The idea that the market has so many unique offerings and capabilities available to you, to fulfill your personal circumstances, is a key element in ensuring that a holistic plan meets your individualised needs. Let me explain a little bit more what I mean by that. 

    If you use your stock example, that’s called 100% equity exposure if it was only in that particular investment. And ultimately, if you are a risk-averse investor, 100% equity-based exposure is completely incorrect for you, because there aren’t any tools of diversification in your overall portfolio to help you with your risk aversion. This is once again where the role of financial advice comes in. The idea that an individual wants to hold a stock – Prosus, in the example that you mentioned – is something that an advisor listens to. They take that into account, in the holistic consideration of the individual in front of them when that financial advice process is taking place, and determine the inclusion of that alongside many other elements. 

    Let’s just go to the process of financial advice in the first place, because that might explain to your listeners exactly what to consider. The idea of financial advice starts with the financial advisor getting to know you. The idea that trust needs to be established – between you (the client) and the advisor – is the only basis under which you’re actually going to share your financial picture and choose to invest with that individual. So the relationship basis is where it begins. 

    Once that is established and you can have an element of trust with the advisor, it starts to move into the space of what your needs are, what your circumstances are, what budget you operate, and so on. So, the financial advisor determines this holistic view of the individual sitting in front of them and starts to determine how to shape their advice responses to this unique set of circumstances. 

    Those circumstances don’t even go yet to stock selection, in the way that you first described. It will go to something like: are there estate planning requirements that need to be fulfilled for this client? For instance, do they have a family that needs to be taken care of in the form of beneficiary nominations? A very basic example. Once again, just illustrating that you can see we’re not even in the stock selection context yet. We’re in the “let’s understand your needs and what you require as an individual first” context. 

    Another example that I can call out in that space is that you might, as an individual, want to be saving for retirement so that your lifestyle – when you do reach retirement – can be maintained in the way it is now. That’s a good example of what a financial advisor would ask. So, all of a sudden, this financial advisor is starting to get all of these data nuggets that indicate exactly how to think about his or her financial advice response to you. 

    The next part of it is to say, “Let’s go through the risk-profiling process (which I alluded to earlier) so that we can understand how to put things together for you.”  It’s at this point that the financial advisor might, in that example, say, “Okay, I’m happy to include your Prosus requirement, but given the risk profile and given your other sets of unique circumstances, I think it only makes sense to have a 5% exposure to this particular asset class in your overall portfolio.” That might serve your need and interest as a client in your ‘hobby budget’ as you refer to it, but the 95% completion of your holistic plan might need something like a guaranteed solution. It might need something like fixed income or money market fund exposure to ensure that your overall risk profile, your overall needs, your overall return objectives that you’re setting for yourself to achieve your goals, are well catered for in the form of financial advice. 

    So, in the steps that I’ve explained, you can see that I shifted the conversation (and I hope your listeners are acutely aware of that – I know they are investment savvy individuals themselves) away from just: What have I heard? What stock selection bias do I have? What is it that I see and read that’s going to confuse my overall financial picture?

    By establishing the role of financial advice, you get clarity and you get an opportunity to then also look at the broader suite of capabilities that might allow for the diversification benefit to be achieved for your set of circumstances. And I think that’s very important.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, I mean the great example would be if you play cricket. You go to your coach and say, “I’m trying to work on this very specific shot. I’ve tried to teach myself the whole way through, and now I need a bit of help.” The financial advisor’s first thought is, “Never mind that – should you even be playing cricket? How many times a week are you playing cricket? Let’s talk about that before we even get down to the specifics of this particular shot or the way you hold the ball.” And that’s a very important point. 

    A financial advisor is so much more than just “Oh, should I buy Sasol?” That’s not actually what it is. And that’s a really important thing for people to understand. 

    I want to talk about some of the Momentum Wealth platform-type stuff before we bring this to a close. But just while we’re on the topic of the financial advisor, specifically. You’ve given a lot of great insights into stuff like the relationship, what they actually do, how important that stuff is. What are some of the other key qualities that you think someone should look at when they’re choosing a financial advisor? This is obviously a topic very close to your heart at Momentum. 

    I’m keen to understand what you would recommend in terms of someone (because they hear this all the time) – “Find a financial advisor.” Okay, great – what do I do? What does that actually look like in practice? Because I think that’s a stumbling block. People hear that all the time, but it’s not necessarily that easy to actually do it.

    Kapil Joshi: So before we get to the wealth platform stuff (which I’m also keen to have a conversation about because this is where partnership with Momentum Wealth, through something like financial advice, provides really strong capabilities to clients and customers in really helping them to deliver their financial value). There are four things I’m going to say to you, and some of it’s going to be a repeat of what I shared earlier. 

    The first thing I want to highlight is that I do not personally question the efficacy and the role that advisors play. I think they’re amazing in what they do and they add value, as I’ve indicated earlier, to clients in achieving their financial objectives. 

    So the four things that I want to highlight are, with the first one: When it comes to sometimes the uncomfortable or personal discussions (I said it a little bit differently earlier), like budgeting – the relationship with an advisor will undoubtedly need an element of trust. So finding someone that you can trust and freely engage with around your financial picture is critical. 

    The second one is, given that each person has different life requirements, finding an advisor who understands your context, and who can work with you in your context, is key to a long term partnership. 

    Third, depending on the complexity of your needs, there are advisors who are more experienced in certain areas, such as when investment opportunities become more complex. Like in the example of hedge funds – it’s less about the softer side and the emotional context, and more about, factually, whether the advisor has the necessary licenses and experience.

    Ultimately my fourth point, which sums it all up, is that it really boils down to whether you like the person, whether you can trust the person, and whether they have the skills and tools necessary to provide a personable solution to you. 

    How you locate a financial advisor is a tricky thing, but often it starts with word of mouth. If you have a friend or family member that is receiving a high quality service from a financial advisor, they are more likely to recommend that individual to you. When you’re sitting and having a braai and you’re talking about stock selection (which is actually happening more and more regularly than you think it is), that’s often when the question comes out in terms of, “How is it that you are able to achieve what you do in your individual sets of circumstances around financial planning?” And that’s where the recommendation of “The advisor that I use…” is recommended. So word of mouth is the first one. 

    The second one is, unfortunately, probably the less accurate one – scouring social media. Scouring, let’s call them, the technology platforms available to us: websites of companies, like Momentum, that have services that they offer. So, we have a business called Momentum Financial Planning that is specifically oriented around giving financial advice and they typically represent themselves in all domains (be it on their website or social media) around the role of advice and so on. 

    Naturally, hashtags and all of that being utilised in searches allow you to see who’s more likely to give you financial advice, especially if you just start from scratch. But that’s a little bit trickier because, as I said – the relationship’s important. So, if you just identify, locationally, where the advisor might be close to you, it still might not be the right fit for you from a relationship perspective. So it’s important that you at least identify that in that journey of just starting from scratch and trying to go at it yourself. 

    And then most corporates and most financial services businesses (like ourselves) have a lot of lead generation that they consider. When direct customers come to them for different capabilities or for different solutions – at some point there’s a nudge to recommend that perhaps you’ve reached the point at which financial advice can be beneficial to you and your set of circumstances. And the pairing up process thereafter obviously becomes, in the same way that I described early on, quite a key opportunity to try and navigate. 

    But if I had to focus on the one that really matters, I think word of mouth is probably the one that results in the best tangible value in terms of engagement between a new client looking for financial advice.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, absolutely. I love that answer because it just talks to how relationship-based it is, at the end of the day. There is a Momentum option for people to go and have a look, and I love the fact that it’s come up in conversation. The idea here is to make sure people are thinking about this correctly – find the advisor that works for you. 

    If that’s a momentum advisor, great. If it’s not, at least you’ve got an advisor and you’re doing the right stuff. Just a shout-out to my friends at Moneyweb who I do a podcast for every week: they have a lot of financial advisor listings on their sites. I was just thinking about that now – it’s also not a bad place to look. I’ve always loved the fact that they’ve done that. I think that they do a lot of really good stuff around just helping people find advisors, getting that sort of advice, which is always nice to see. 

    So, let’s move on then to the Momentum Wealth Platform. So this is where I very quickly start to run out of talent and knowledge – I’ve never worked as a financial advisor. I personally often see these discussions around all these fancy platforms and wrappers and everything else. And then I have to remind myself that’s not the thing that came off the lollipop that my 5-year-old just devoured! So, we need to do a little bit of…not necessarily jargon busting here, but I’m keen to understand some of this stuff. 

    Let’s start with the Momentum Wealth Platform, because that word ‘platform’ gets used a lot in financial services. It’s pretty much everywhere. What does that actually mean and what difference does it make to the end user – the person listening to this right now, who’s thinking, “Maybe I should speak to an advisor?” instead of punting everything on Sasol all the time. What does the Momentum Wealth Platform actually mean to that person?

    Kapil Joshi: I’m going to answer this with a big smile on my face because we get it a lot in terms of industry jargon and our responses to it. So, let’s demystify it very quickly. A platform is really just a code word for the idea that you have a central administration mechanism available to you where you can house your products (things like retirement annuities, endowments) and your solutions or your components (things like unit trust funds, share portfolios, hedge funds, or whatever the case might be). What a platform does is it’s able to consolidate your product selection as well as your solution selection, report to you, via your advisor or to you directly, in a way that allows you to see the benefits of a combination of your products and your solutions.

    The other idea that platforms bring you, which I also want to highlight, is the fact that (and so far we’ve been having a conversation that’s quite general, but) typically in an investment journey you might have local exposure and you might have international exposure as well. 

    At Momentum we have Momentum Wealth Local, which is our local platform that gives you rand-based exposure. We also have Momentum Wealth International, which gives you hard currency exposure in a currency like USD or GBP, and that allows you to externalise assets. 

    Now both of these essentially resemble the platform capability that we have. And just a reminder of what I said earlier – it’s the housing, through an administration mechanism of your products as well as your solutions, to be able to consolidate between your local and international holdings in a way that allows you to now have a one-stop shop essentially where all of your investments and savings are housed. So now, essentially, you don’t have to go to a different place if you want a share portfolio, you don’t have to go to a different place if you want a unit trust fund – you can have all of that in one single investment and therefore contract that one single investment against your goals or objectives that you set for yourself in terms of that particular investment approach. 

    So the long and the short of it is: let’s kind of debunk all of the terminology and the jargon. Forget the words ‘platforms’ and ‘wrappers’. It’s a place you can come to start your investments and savings journey in a one-stop shop manner that allows you to have access to great reporting, great service, and a fantastic range of products, as well as solutions.

    The Finance Ghost: So let me ask you, while we just dig into some of this platform stuff. I think some of the responses people have gotten to a point where they give almost automatically is –  they’ve almost become allergic to costs and fees, right? This must be something that you deal with all the time. We’ve kind of gotten to a place where people almost expect this stuff for free, just about, and anything that’s not free is painful, you know, and obviously that’s not realistic or real life. But there’s been a lot of (really quite correct) content that’s gone around online, around the impact of fees on returns, etc. 

    I guess it’s a cost benefit then at the end of the day. If you get your stuff into the right structure, if you then have the right discipline, etc. – it’s going to cost you something. But net-net, it should make you something. 

    And I think that’s where a lot of your stats come from. The benefit of actually doing this is yes, Momentum needs to eat, but you’re going to eat more as well on average through getting the advice and having the right platform, right? 

    I think that’s maybe a nice place to start to bring this to a close. Just understanding – we’ve done some really good stuff around how cool DIY investing is – how important it is to do it in a broader framework and get those guardrails in place. Understand that your advisor is so much more than your stock-picking mate at the braai. This platform is out there. So let’s tie it all together and just talk about the costs of doing this, but really the benefits that come through from doing it.

    Kapil Joshi: I don’t mind the conversation around costs, but I want to shift it to value. It’s important to recognise that the role of platforms isn’t just a cost line in what clients are willing to pay via the advice that they receive, or even if it is just by themselves. It’s about the value that is extracted for the cost that is levied. And I think it’s important to understand why those charging structures look the way that they do in a total value chain context. 

    Remember – there’s really three main buckets of costs when you enter via platform. The first one is the advice fee you pay, typically, if you are generating some form of advice. Then there is the administration or platform fee – that is where a business like Momentum Wealth would come in for certain services that it offers and services that are often at scale, which is not something that can be replicated by clients in their own right (and I’ll unpack some of that). And then finally, the investment management fees for either the share that you own or the unit trust that you’re exposed to – that also comes at a fee. Which ultimately results in very simplistically, these three components coming together for the total fee that a client would ultimately pay. 

    The value chain basis under which we are operating in South Africa right now is that platform administration margin has been under pressure for a period of time and hovers somewhere in the region of around 30 to 45 basis points, or 0.3 to 0.45% per annum for that specific component in the total fee value chain. 

    Now, if you think about it in the biggest scheme of what it is that you’re trying to pursue as an individual investor or via something like financial advice, when I refer to the value that the platform gives, I’ve given you some instances of it in my previous response around debunking what a platform is. 

    The first one is consolidated reporting. To be able to have a one-stop shop that allows you to have access to multiple components, multiple products and so on, and to give you a consolidated view of that so that you can have better conversations about your goals and your objectives. And to re-orientate it I think is key. 

    In addition to that, the platforms work hand in hand with financial advisors in the sense that the service that we offer and the service that advisors expect from a business like Momentum Wealth has to be world class. This is about the basics like trading and settlement. You don’t want to be out of the market for a period of time when things are happening that might be driving market prices. The role of the platform is then very much to circumvent some of those issues so that you, as an investor, don’t have to worry about that and can have a sleep-at-night factor – that’s critically important. 

    Another area to highlight is that you can have what I referred to earlier as both this local exposure and this international exposure. If you start to think about intergenerational wealth (which might be a topic we want to speak about in a future podcast) there are things that one needs to consider in the holistic planning process – both around product selection, and also the movement of money. All of a sudden, it’s no longer just dealing with a single investor. It might start to be that you’re dealing with the broader family and the benefits of dealing with the broader family. 

    In our recent Momentum Wealth International launch, that we just traveled the country to share, we’ve now introduced a concept called family aggregation from a pricing perspective. This means that all contracts in this family grouping (for your direct family as an example) will benefit from one single fee structure, which can reduce fees to the maximum of around 40% in terms of the discount that is offered on a platform like Momentum Wealth. 

    So you can see the additional benefits that the platform offers – and I’m just calling out three or four examples now, there’s way more that we can spend time talking about. The attachment to the fee that we charge should start to mean something less to clients because of the value that is being extracted from the platform for what that fee relates to. And I firmly stand by that. 

    I think we offer great capabilities to not only support and benefit the financial advice process, but ultimately to ensure that clients do not pay a fee that doesn’t result in value for them and that, at the same time, we stand hand in hand with them in the long-term investment objectives in a way that allows them to meet those objectives. We do not believe that the fees that we levy are value-eroding in that regard.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, I think that’s very fair. It’s like every service in life. It’s going to cost something and you need to look at the value you’re getting from it – you need to decide if it’s going to work for you. And you need to remember that these things exist for a reason, and if the reason is not apparent to you yet, the reason will probably become apparent down the line when you possibly have some regrets that you didn’t look at this early on.

    So, Kapil, thank you so much. I think we’ve dealt with a lot of really, really cool stuff on the show. For anyone who wants to learn more about Momentum, I think it’s easiest to just go to the Momentum website, right? Go and check out the wealth offerings, etcetera. Just go and dig around and learn more. We’ll include some useful links in the show notes here just to help you find the right stuff. And Kapil, thank you – it’s been a really good chat. I appreciate it.

    Kapil Joshi: Thanks, Ghost. And maybe just a final note from my side: yes, please go and have a look at our website, but also follow us on social media. We post very interesting thought leadership and we share some of our insights across the wealth management industry into the broader investments industry. 

    That can be very beneficial to your listeners that are looking to understand a little bit more about what we offer, but to also just benefit from some of the great thought leadership by industry experts that sit in our business, whom we take great pride in at least sharing with your listeners. 

    Thanks, Ghost. I really appreciate being here. It was a great conversation and all the best.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, thank you. And as a final comment from my side – well done for everything going on in Momentum at the moment. Obviously I’ve been following the stock and the story, the name. It’s doing what it says on the tin right now. There is a lot of momentum, so congrats. Keep it going.

    Kapil Joshi: Wonderful, thank you so much! Really appreciate it. And I’ll definitely take that message back into the business as well. Great stuff. Thank you.

    The Finance Ghost: Cool. Ciao.

    Verified by MonsterInsights