Saturday, April 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 51

Ghost Stories #40: Fedgroup does things differently

Listen to the show using this podcast player:

Does Fedgroup think differently about preserving and growing wealth for their clients? Perhaps their position as one of the largest beekeepers in the country answers that question. In this show, Michael Field (General Manager: Investments) joined me to unpack the way Fedgroup thinks about investing.

The JSE has a small (and shrinking) pool of assets being chased by deep pools of capital. Alternative assets can offer inflation protection, diversification and stability in a portfolio that still includes exposure to traditional asset classes like equities and bonds.

After all, when the market can throw a lot of red numbers at you on your brokerage account in a tough year, having assets that are focused on stability and inflation protection can make all the difference.

For those who prefer to read, the full transcript of the show is available further down.

And remember, this podcast is for informational purposes only. Nothing in here should be taken as advice.

Download Fedgroup’s corporate profile here


 

Full transcript:

The Finance Ghost: Welcome to this episode of the Ghost Stories podcast, and it’s going to be a super interesting one today. Although I feel like I always say that, because we always have such good guests on the show and such great topics to unpack. Today we’ve got Michael Field, who is the General Manager: Investments at Fedgroup. If you read your Ghost Bites for a period of a couple of months, you would have seen the Fedgroup branding on it, you might have seen some of the articles placed in Ghost Mail unpacking some really interesting and relevant investment topics. Michael, I think today we’re going to bring a few of them together and just use this podcast as a really good way for you to get Fedgroup’s thinking out there from an investments perspective and a portfolio construction perspective. I think you guys do have some pretty interesting approaches and you do think quite differently to a lot of other people in what you do. Welcome to the show and I’m excited to do this with you.

Michael Field: Thanks so much for having me. Looking forward to it.

The Finance Ghost: Let’s start with this concept of capital preservation and what it really means. I think we very much live in a world right now where inflation is a consistent theme. It hasn’t exactly disappeared, not that it ever really disappears in South Africa, but this higher-for-longer interest rates story just seems to be gaining momentum at the time of recording. There are some big US data releases coming out this week. We’ll see what that means for the Fed, but on the whole, it’s very much been a narrative of higher interest rates for longer and the rest of the world is largely compelled to follow what the Fed is doing, otherwise it causes all kinds of other problems for their currency and everything else.

From a capital preservation perspective, in this high inflation, high interest rate type environment, is it enough to actually just preserve the nominal value of your capital? I have a million rand today, and I just want to make sure that I still have a million rand next year or a little bit more from a savings account. Or does capital preservation actually mean something different?

Michael Field: In short, it’s probably better phrased as value preservation. As you said, we’re in really strange inflationary times. I think it’s a bit of an odd one where Covid has kind of synced up everyone’s interest rate cycles. And as you say, we are totally beholden on what’s happening in the likes of the US. We were actually having a discussion the other day, and remember we were sort of chatting around – when was it? Almost a year and a half ago – and everyone was expecting that in January 2023, rates were going to start coming down.

We sit so much further down and we’re still there. So I think inflation is going to be with us a fair while longer. It’s about preserving value.

The Finance Ghost: In terms of preserving value, is that a nominal thing? I have a million rand. I still want a million rand. Or what does it actually mean? Preserving buying power and actually making sure that down the line, you’re not worse off in two or three years time than you are today?

Michael Field: I think it’s about buying power. We tend to operate in very low volatility, or certainly that’s how we look to place our investments. I think there’s an element of that asymmetry: if you lose 10%, you’ve got to gain 11% to get back to where you started. So I think that’s maybe another angle of it; preserve your buying power, make sure you’re still going to get what you used to get.

And I think that extends beyond official inflation. It depends on who the individual is and how they experience inflation. Obviously, food is something that hits all of us, but depending if you’re looking to buy a car or get into the housing market, whatever it might be, how each person experiences that cost and their personal inflation is really what it’s about.

The Finance Ghost: I always look at cars and I always think if people actually did the maths – you’re not just paying off the car you have right now. Theoretically, you should also have a little sinking fund for the next car you want to replace this one of an equivalent level, and that’s why you’re seeing this proliferation of Chinese brands on South African roads because people who bought a 3 Series seven years ago absolutely cannot replace it with a 3 Series today. You need a million bucks. And that wasn’t the case seven years ago. So to your point, inflation is very specific to individuals. But you’ve also touched on an important point there, which is don’t lose money. And it sounds so obvious; no one wants to lose money. If it was so easy, then no one would ever lose money. And I guess that’s a big part of the thinking. It is a bit of risk aversion, I suppose. Loss aversion. Would you say that’s something that is quite baked into your thinking at Fedgroup?

Michael Field: We’ve obviously got a broad range of products, but where we started back in 1990 was a fixed rate product. That was the first product we ever offered, and I suppose a lot of that is carried through in our thinking. For us, there’s that broader element as well. We like to think about some of the different elements when it comes to investing, and sometimes that also has to extend to the individual and almost some of those psychological factors for them. Investing 101 is don’t sell the dip. But we know that it’s avoiding that irrational fear and those types of fears.

Where we can construct products and help people to get past some of their own fears and some of those sorts of things, it’s an unconventional way of helping people to meet their outcomes. It’s not simply about what is that underlying investment doing, although that’s obviously a very important factor. What are some of the other things you can build in there that are going to help people get to that outcome?

The Finance Ghost: In your articles and in some of the stuff I’ve read coming out of Fedgroup, there is a little bit of a bearishness around South African equities in general, and I’d like to unpack that a little bit with you – where that’s coming from and what makes you feel that way and how you think about this. Are South Africans really being paid a premium for the risk they are actually taking by holding South African equities? Obviously it is a cyclical thing. So it’s one of those classic stories where, depending on your starting point and your end point, you can come up with five different answers to suit a specific thing. But on the whole – because I actually share a lot of that viewpoint – is around some general bearishness, around SA equities I do most of my stock picking, to be honest, is offshore. There are obviously some gems on the local market which are well worth owning, in my opinion. But a lot of my equity exposure does sit outside of South Africa for a whole lot of reasons. I’m keen to understand your bearishness around SA equities as an asset class in general.

Michael Field: Sure. So I think that there’s quite a few elements which almost individually wouldn’t necessarily paint the same picture, until you start to stack them up. Maybe to state the obvious, we’re talking about listed equity. That is where we have that more bearish stance.

I think some of it has got to do with the nature of running equities on a larger scale. Particularly if you look at some of the factors in the South African economy, there are more investable assets in terms of the likes of retirement funds in that then almost the scale of the JSE, particularly if you look at so-called SA Inc., it’s actually a really small pool of assets. If you want to start getting a little bit more creative in some of those stock picks, there’s not that much room to maneuver and take some positions. So we see that sort of distorting some of what’s going on the JSE.

Another very different element of it is, no news to anyone – South Africa has got some challenges. What we see is that smaller companies are a bit more nimble and they’re actually, in our view, doing better than many of the large listed. and I think maybe we’ll come back to it later. But where we play in a lot of the so-called alternative space, we’re seeing better value there than in some of the listed equities. To be clear, our stance is not anti equity, is not that we’re advocating for people not to be holding equities. Absolutely. All our multi asset funds are holding substantial equity positions onshore and offshore.

It’s that we think for so long, equities performed relatively predictably.

As long as you’re willing to be in there for a five year period, you’re going to get really good returns. We haven’t seen that for a while. And I think it’s causing people to sort of go back and relook at what is diversification. What does it actually mean to construct a broader portfolio?

That’s a lot of what we’ve been doing for quite a while now.

We are saying we see a fair bit of stuff we don’t like in the equity space, but also we see other areas that we think present better opportunities. It’s kind of some push, some pull when we’re looking at that.

The Finance Ghost: I think the larger equities in South Africa are struggling because they have this systemic exposure to basically the country. Just look at Vodacom, looking for growth in somewhere like Egypt and then the challenges that actually brings. And there are plenty of examples of South African large caps that are really struggling to do revenue growth outside of single digits. It’s very, very tough for them to grow. A lot of smaller companies can grow because they’re taking market share as disruptors. Capitec, that’s probably the biggest success story of democratic South Africa, and a lot of that was because of market share. They’ve basically just come and eaten the lunch of the traditional banks. So the banking sector can either be this very dull thing, depending who you look at, or it dished up one of the most exciting equity opportunities of modern day South Africa. So I agree, there’s a lot of interesting opportunities in the smaller stuff.

Michael Field: Absolutely. Where the big listed guys have to occupy most or every market segment, if you get into some of the smaller entities and some of the guys operating outside of that listed space, they can dominate a niche and do really well. For us, those are some of the more exciting places.

The Finance Ghost: Let’s move on to this topic of balanced portfolios and what these actually are, what this actually means and the rule of thumb, and I’ll leave it to you to give those traditional thoughts around balanced portfolios. But then to also touch on how you guys think about alternative investments, which you raised earlier in our discussion. So let’s bring in that conversation and just explain the Fedgroup thinking around building out a wealth portfolio and what that actually looks like.

Michael Field: I think the traditional approach of a 60/40 split or a 70/30 split – the mere fact that I can say two numbers and you know that I’m talking about equities and bonds as only two asset classes. And that’s what for so long has meant a balanced, diversified portfolio.

What we’re seeing in these somewhat unusual times with what’s going on globally, many of those funds are not really performing and certainly not performing like people are used to. In our view, what has come to mean diversification is having a few different flavours of the same thing in a basket. I sometimes use the example of banks since we touched on them earlier. Let’s keep using that.

They are so heavily affected by what’s happening to the repo rate. It’s such a big driver in those businesses. Whether you’ve got green bank or blue bank actually makes no difference to what’s happening on that lever. So for us, it’s to take that step beyond just the one business and look at what are some of those really big underlying levers that are affecting them. How does one construct a portfolio that is diversifying away from that?

Of course, one of the other big overarching themes is just plain sentiment. Again, if we go into the alternatives, that allows you to be less affected by so much of that sentiment. You see some really good businesses sitting at ridiculous multiples just because of sentiment, and vice versa. You see some businesses think, how on earth are people still buying this? For us, it’s about saying, okay, what’s actually underlying this? What’s going to drive it? And so if we then segue that into alternatives, that’s a lot of where we are finding this real value for our customers. What do we mean by alternatives? Very clearly they are not all the same. In many ways, alternatives is just “other” in terms of the category. It is everything else.

We were very specific about what we are interested in using within that alternative segment. What we’re interested in is things that are typically tangible. What we’re talking about there is how do we get back to so-called real investments, things almost closer to your primary activities. A couple of the sectors that we are very active in is agriculture, another being green energy. We’re one of the largest solar installers across the country. I’ll maybe touch on that again a little bit later.

We also look at simple business models that are robust, that can offer a lot of the characteristics that an investor is looking for. For example, we talked about inflation earlier. Everyone’s trying to hedge and protect themselves against inflation. One approach to that might be going down various derivatives and buying inflation cover and whatever it might be, that can be quite an expensive way of trying to cover yourself from that risk. The other approach is to say, okay, within the agri space, we know ultimately we’re selling food, and food tends to shift with inflation fairly directly. And so high inflation, low inflation, we’ve got what we refer to as some of that natural hedging coming through. Similarly, currency is another one that people are trying to protect their buying power. And again, to continue on that agricultural example, about 85% of the agri ventures that we’re invested into, that produce is being sold offshore. We look at sectors where there are different options in terms of where it gets sold. So if the US starts to cool off, there are other areas, be it Asia, Europe, where that produce can still be sold into relatively hard currencies versus the likes of the rand. So you’re getting currency hedges there.

What we’re not interested in is all sorts of snake oil. There’s a lot of noise in this alternative space. People coming with all sorts of private equity where it’s totally unsecured, lending into all kinds of obscure – you have no idea what’s actually under there. That’s not at all the space that we’re playing in. For us, it’s about saying, how do we get proper security for our clients into assets that are going to provide them the profile of investment and profile of return that they’re looking for?

And then just the last point around this: we really specialised in these assets. So when say that we are investing in agriculture, we’re not just writing a cheque and having a look at the financials to decide if that business is doing what it’s supposed to. We have people on those farms at least once a month. We have Internet of Things devices on those farms measuring what they’re doing. We have teams of agronomists, independent experts across the country, making sure we know what’s going on. We’ve recognised where there is additional value to be unlocked. So we know one of the major shortages in our agricultural sector is actually bees. Fedgroup is one of, if not the largest beekeepers in the country. And we did that so that we can protect those agricultural investments. More than that, we know that where we go and install beehives, we’re seeing 30% yield increases on those farms. There’s fairly little an investor can do in the likes of the listed space or something that’s going to produce a 30% uplift in that business. For us, that’s where we’ve really specialised. We’re not simply writing a cheque and doing a traditional credit or private equity type of investment.

The Finance Ghost: There really are all sorts of things in the private asset space, to your point. And I think what you guys do is pretty unique. I can’t say that I’ve seen anyone else really doing it, certainly not to the scale that you are doing it. It’s something that was discussed on a previous Ghost Stories podcast with Grant, the CEO of Fedgroup, and we unpacked some of the returns in there. You guys have got that very cool app that lets people go in and invest in these. And you make the point: it’s bees. It literally is as real as that. It’s this very, very interesting alternative portfolio, and I think it does maybe speak to just the breadth of the offering at Fedgroup, because it’s really everything from big balanced portfolios all the way down to literally someone being able to say, “I want to start investing, maybe the markets scare me a bit, or I’m not sure I understand them, or I want some diversification, I want something a bit more real”. There’s obviously also the ESG angle to it, frankly, which is to go and invest in things that are actually just good for the planet, like bees, and to go and be able to actually save and invest in this stuff is quite an interesting offering. And of course, it’s not just the feel good. I mean, it offers a genuine return, some inflation protection, and decent upside along the way. I think that’s the overarching point here, is by potentially not being fully exposed to just big equities, you can actually still have investments that grow.

This is not to say you need to give up growth, but you are bringing in the value of diversification and having something different and a nice yield underpin. And that does talk to your DNA as a group, obviously, which comes from the sort of fixed income style investing. These balanced portfolios do have a place and it’s how you balance them that is obviously different and what actually goes in there and that changes over time. But I think for a lot of investors who came into the market during the pandemic, they kind of don’t understand why you wouldn’t just be in equities. Because that’s all they’ve known, is zero interest rate environments. What is this thing called yield? I just want to own the fancy Cathie Wood stocks. Roaring Kitty is back on Twitter. Everyone’s in GameStop again. The meme stocks are back. I mean, it’s all the chaos, right? But that’s not real life. And that’s why these interest rates have stayed higher for longer, because the Fed effectively needs to cleanse a whole lot of the monster that their monetary policy actually created during the pandemic. That doesn’t lend itself so well to equities over the long term. Equities is a great asset class, but it’s not going to be the rocket ship that people experience from 2020 into 2021. I mean, if it was like that every year, well, one, we would all be fabulously wealthy, but two, inflation would be completely out of control. The checks and balances would not work there.

Michael Field: Absolutely. I think you’ve again touched on some of the reasons why we are a little bit bearish.

I think sometimes people are surprised. They see Fedgroup, they see a very innovative company. The reality is, yes, we are very innovative, but we’re actually really conservative. That’s why we’ve really developed this name for these very stable investments, whether those are. We offer a lot of fixed rate investments, where clients are exposed to those underlying assets, and they tend to be really quite low volatility type of investments. We also work a lot with the independent advisor market, and I can’t tell you the number of advisors who said to me, thank goodness I’ve got you in my clients portfolios. The number of times I’ve had to go and show them a page full of red numbers. Thank goodness I’ve got a green number next to Fedgroup. And that’s exactly where we see it forming that part of a portfolio. Again, and we touched on it in the beginning, I’m not advocating for this to be 100% of a person’s portfolio. What we’re seeing people typically using is in the order of 20 to 50, depending on what it is they’re trying to achieve, where they are in their life, whatever it might be. That’s where they’re using some of these real low volatility type of things that I think we’re a bit of a specialist and certainly very well known for. Of course, that’s how we’re using it in some of our various multi asset funds as well on those types of ratios.

The Finance Ghost: As we start to bring the podcast to a close, I think the key message to really take out from this, from what I’m hearing, it is possible to achieve real growth and to do it with stability. So growth ahead of inflation, but to do it with stability and to do it with asset classes that are distinct from your traditional balanced portfolio kind of thinking. Would you say that, in a nutshell, that really is the sort of Fedgroup approach to these things and why someone should actually look to go and do further research into Fedgroup and the offerings that you’ve got?

Michael Field: Absolutely. It’s that solid foundation to a portfolio. Are many of these things going to give you a 20% or 25% turn in a year? No, but at the same time you’ve got a very low probability that they’re going to do, less than 5% or less than 8%, frankly. Certainly the chance of you getting a red negative number in there is really low. People are really enjoying – particularly in South Africa today – that they’ve got one less thing to worry about. So that’s where we’ve seen some phenomenal growth in people coming to us to meet these sorts of needs.

I think people these days are very chuffed with a 10% return that doesn’t give them sleepless nights, and that’s what we’re looking to offer.

The Finance Ghost: I think when I was a teenager, as I recall, my grandmother had a little bit of money that kind of came our way early, and it really was a little bit of money. And the deal was we had to invest it. I’m 99.9% sure that it was a Fedgroup income fund that it went into. I can actually recall getting the statements as this impressionable young teenager, so I actually have a bit of history with Fedgroup too, going all the way back. Not quite back to when you started – I’m not old enough for that, but back to my teenage years. I do think Fedgroup was my first ever investment product. So there’s some cool history with the brand.

Michael Field: I’ll try look up Ghost on the system, see if anything comes up.

The Finance Ghost: Yeah look, if you have a ghost in the machine, you have different problems rather than me.

Michael Field: No, but that’s so cool.

The Finance Ghost: I thought you’d appreciate that story. So I would point anyone who wants to go and find out more about what you do and how you do it to go and check out Fedgroup.co.za. Well, by the time you access the site, it might be different, but right now, if you went on, you’d be met by a hand holding some playing cards and a statement that gambling is for the casino, not your investment portfolio, which I think talks quite well to how you guys think and what you guys do. So, Michael, thank you so much for your time today. I’m assuming those who want to connect with you directly can do so on LinkedIn.

Michael Field: Yeah, that’s probably the best channel.

The Finance Ghost: Okay, fantastic. And otherwise, as I said, go check out Fedgroup.co.za. Go have a look at what they do. And Michael, thanks for all the support in Ghost Mail and for bringing Ghost Bites to people for the months that you did. Really appreciate it. And to the listeners, thank you so much for being here, and I look forward to you joining me on the next podcast.

Ghost Bites (Capital Appreciation | Nictus | Ninety One | Sygnia | Trustco | Vukile | York Timber)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:


Juicy growth at Capital Appreciation (JSE: CTA)

The dividend is up 21% in this technology group

Capital Appreciation has released a strong set of numbers, with revenue exceeding R1 billion and up 19%. That set the tone for the rest of the numbers, including a 75% increase in cash generated from operations. The terminal estate (the point-of-sale machines out there) increased by 9%.

EBITDA margin expanded by 480 basis points and HEPS was up 83%, so the numbers are all strongly in the right direction wherever you look. The full-year dividend increased by 21%.

Although acquisitions (like the R151.1 million Dariel deal) had an impact on metrics like revenue growth, the reality is that the company had the balance sheet to execute on those acquisitions. This is inevitably a better outcome for shareholders than a share-for-share deal that grows the group but dilutes existing shareholders and impacts HEPS. In the case of Dariel, the deal was structured as a cash payment of R46.9 million and an allotment of treasury shares worth R37.1 million. There will be further payments if earn-out targets are reached.

Here’s the really interesting thing though: in this period, it was the payments segment that achieved the magic, with a rather incredible scenario where an extra R38 million in revenue led to an extra R33 million in operating profit. Talk about growth dropping to the bottom line! In the software business (which includes Dariel), things are a lot trickier. Revenue was much higher (with the acquisition making a big difference here), yet operating profit actually fell from R79 million to R56.5 million.

Luckily, the pressure in the software business wasn’t enough to offset the party in payments.


Nictus has flagged a significant jump in HEPS (JSE: NCS)

But we should wait for full details of the impact of IFRS 17 on these numbers

Companies that are impacted by IFRS 17: Insurance Contracts are reporting numbers that really are difficult to compare to results that came out before this standard was implemented. We are seeing this across the financial services industry, with other companies like furniture retailer Nictus being affected as well.

It’s therefore best to wait until the release of detailed results on 28 June before jumping to conclusions about the underlying performance. For now at least, we know that HEPS for the year ended March will be between 19.24 cents and 21.56 cents, an increase of between 57.43% and 77.43%.

The share price in this tiny company is R0.95.


Ninety One is struggling to move forward (JSE: N91 | JSE: NY1)

Without strong distribution, pure asset managers are struggling with outflows

As you’ll also see in Sygnia further down, net outflows are a problem for asset managers. The groups with a strong wealth management / distribution business are still achieving net inflows as they have a sales force out there doing the hard yards. The asset managers waiting for asset allocations aren’t so lucky.

Ninety One reported a drop in assets under management of 3% for the year ended March 2024, with negative net flows of £9.4 billion. That’s at least better than the negative net flow of £10.6 billion in the comparable year. It looks worse if we consider average assets under management rather than just the end-points, with that metric down 8%. Assets under management at year-end came in at £126 billion.

Despite this, profit before tax was up 2%. Adjusted operating margin wasn’t as encouraging, down by 70 basis points to 32% as adjusted operating profit fell by 8%. That’s probably the right metric to consider, along with the the dividend per share falling by 7%.

Here’s a chart showing you what the interest rate cycles do to net flows:


Sygnia achieved decent growth in earnings (JSE: SYG)

The payout ratio has decreased though

Sygnia has released its results for the six months to March 2024. With assets under management and administration up by 7.3%, they are doing better than some other big local names in the industry. In this period, market performance more than offset the net outflows of R11.2 billion. Worryingly, the net outflows are much worse than R5.1 billion in the comparable period, so the growth in assets is being driven by volatile factors rather than a steady inflow of assets.

Institutional assets under management came in at R269.8 million at the end of March vs. R71.5 billion in retail assets.

Revenue is up 8.7% and expenses increased by 8.0%, which means there was margin expansion. Profit before tax increased by 10.2%. HEPS was up 9.7% to 100.7 cents, so the revenue growth is translating nicely into earnings growth.

The dividend hasn’t quite followed suit though, only increasing by 3.4% to 90 cents per share.


Trustco has announced the diamond resource estimate for Meya Mine (JSE: TTO)

The cautionary announcement has been withdrawn

All the way back in July 2023, Trustco announced that Sterling Global Trading would take a 70% stake in Meya Mining. The circular hasn’t been released yet as the resources report on Meya Mine was pending. This report has now been released. with Z Star Mineral Resource Consultants having prepared the estimate.

As a reminder, Trustco holds a 19.5% interest in Meya Mining with a total investment of $116 million.

The estimated value of the 1.99 million carats at Meya Mining is $763 million, of which $104 million is in the indicated category and $659 million is inferred, based on an average value of $382 per carat. The assessment was based on an area of land that is less than 5% of the combined strike lengths of the kimberlite domains within the licensed area.


Vukile feels proud of the latest financial year and with good reason (JSE: VKE)

This is one of the best REITs on the JSE right now

Vukile has released results for the year ended March 2024. Across the South African and Spanish portfolios, net operating income growth was up 5.4% and 11% respectively. There were positive rental reversions in both portfolios, with South Africa at +2.9% and Spain at +9.7%.

The loan-to-value ratio of 40.7% is at a healthy level for a REIT and they have no issues in raising both debt and equity funding, with strong support across the market.

With total funds from operations per share up 6.7% and the total dividend for the year up by 10.5%, it’s little wonder that there are investors who are happy to keep giving money to this management team.

Those who hold shares in Vukile should take note of the dividend reinvestment alternative, with that circular available here.


York Timber is acquiring additional farms (JSE: YRK)

The purchase price is R75 million

York Timber announced a deal with Stevens Lumbar Mills that will see York acquiring six properties, the standing timber thereon and the related water rights. The market value has been estimated as R75 million and the purchase price has been set at this level.

R30 million is payable up-front as a deposit, with the rest funded through the raising of debt by York. This will need to happen within 120 days of the signature date of the deal.

This is a Category 2 transaction, so there is no shareholder vote.


Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • The CEO of Thungela (JSE: TGA) put in place a collar structure over shares worth R67.4 million. The put strike price is R134.72 and the call strike price is R183.43, with expiry in June 2026. The current price is R132, so technically the put is already in the money. He is hedging against further downside, while giving away upside above the call strike price.
    • A director of ADvTECH (JSE: ADH) sold shares worth R3.8 million.
    • A director of Northam Holdings (JSE: NPH) has purchased shares worth R944k.
    • Aside from a sale by a director linked to share options, we also saw the company secretary of Impala Platinum (JSE: IMP) sell shares in the company worth R665k.
    • A director of Collins Property Group (JSE: CPP) has bought shares worth R450k.
  • As I did the other day with a similar trade by the same parties, I’m including this separately to director dealings as an institutional investor with board representation isn’t quite the same thing. Still, it’s good that Capitalworks has bought another R14.6 million worth of shares in RFG Holdings (JSE: RFG).
  • Datatec (JSE: DTC) has released the circular dealing with the scrip dividend alternative for the 130 cents per share dividend. The scrip dividend is calculated with reference to the 30-day volume-weighted average price (VWAP).
  • If you are interested in learning more about Santova (JSE: SNV), then you can refer to the latest analyst presentation made by the company at this link.
  • The trading suspension on Oando (JSE: OAO) has been lifted now that the company has caught up on its financial reporting.

Ghost Bites (British American Tobacco | Copper 360 | Momentum Metropolitan | MultiChoice | Pan African Resources | RCL Foods)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:


British American Tobacco flags a weak first half (JSE: BTI)

Delivering the full-year guidance will depend on the US market

The British American Tobacco share price is trading at the same levels as ten years ago. Sure, there’s been volatility along the way, but the direction of travel is sideways, This is despite so much rand depreciation over that period. I have always struggled to understand the investment case here. Even the current dividend yield of nearly 10% isn’t a good enough total return to justify exposure, with the company constantly on a price-volume treadmill as global tobacco industry volumes are expected to fall 3% this year.

I couldn’t help but notice that the illicit vapour trade is now a problem. Illicit cigarette trading has been around forever. It seems that the crooks have also hired ESG consultants now, focusing on the New Categories instead. This is a particularly problematic situation in the US market, but there are proposed enforcement bills in 20 states. Such bills have only been enacted in 3 states thus far.

This is one of the reasons why revenue for the first half will be down low-single digits, along with adjusted profit from operations. This is on a constant currency basis. They are hoping for a much better second half, driven in part by management initiatives in the US market. Encouragingly, they expect operating cash flow conversion of over 90% again in 2024.

Further cash flow came in from the completion of the sale of 3.5% in ITC, unlocking substantial funds for share buybacks to try and drive earnings per share and inject some upward momentum into the share price.

By 2026, the goal is 3% to 5% revenue growth, along with mid-single digit adjusted profit from operations growth.


Copper 360 is off to a pretty awful start as a listed company (JSE: CPR)

There’s a very big miss of earnings forecasts here

Copper 360 announced that its headline loss per share for the year ended February 2024 will be between -10.5 cents and -12.0 cents. Compared to the previously published forecast HEPS of 2.9 cents for the same period, this is a very ugly miss.

They attribute this to inadequate crushing capacity, poor recoveries due to low acid solubility and delays in regulatory approval of funding for the acquisition of Nama Copper, which means that processing could only commence in March 2024 vs. the original plan to commence production in December 2023.

This is the same company that reported suspected market manipulation to the FSCA in April, believing that uncommercial trades led to a drop in the traded price. I haven’t seen the outcome of that complaint, but perhaps they should be focusing on their operations rather than obsessing over the share price.

Hopefully things will improve going forward. The market doesn’t appreciate a start like this.


Momentum Metropolitan’s growth has slowed in the latest quarter, but still looks good (JSE: MTM)

IFRS 17 does impact the comparability of these numbers, though

Momentum Metropolitan has released numbers for the nine months to March 2024. They reflect very strong growth in new business, but there’s a major change here. The present value of new business premiums (PVNBP) is now calculated using a risk-free discount rate rather than a discount rate that includes a risk premium. This is due to changes under IFRS 17. This has the impact of inflating the growth rate, showing 20% growth in new business. I didn’t see any disclosure of what the growth would be without that change.

This is a complicated group that ends up being a mixed bag when you look at the various operations, but management sounds pretty happy with the numbers. It does seem as though they have some struggles with costs at the moment, negatively impacting the value of new business.

Assets under management in Momentum Investments improved by 15% to R602.6 billion, but the acquisition of Crown Agents Investment Management added R57 billion of the total increase of nearly R79 billion.

One of the other highlights was an improvement in the claims ratio at Momentum Insure, improving the underwriting performance significantly.

Performance on a per-share basis will be boosted by significant share buybacks, which the group is managing to do at a substantial discount to the embedded value per share thanks to where the market is trading.

The group will share more information about the medium- and long-term strategy in July 2024.


The MultiChoice circular for the Canal+ offer has been released (JSE: MCG)

This deal has been going on for months now

The real action in the Canal+ activity around MultiChoice started in February, although the parties had already been in discussions for well over a year. Clearly, Canal+ sees MultiChoice as a juicy strategic opportunity, in line with the broader consolidation plays we are seeing in the media industry in response to the strength of global giants like Netflix.

After some initial tough negotiations around a price of R105 per share, the parties eventually agreed to cooperate at a price of R125 per share. Although structured as a mandatory offer, this is a price well above the R105 mandatory offer that the MultiChoice board would’ve advised shareholders not to accept. In other words, they’ve effectively accelerated the process by being willing to pay up. As I said, Canal+ sees this as a great opportunity.

Canal+ is headquartered in France and has 26.4 million subscribers, including 17 million outside France. The Africa subscriber base has nearly doubled in five years, with Canal+ having operated on the continent for over 30 years, starting in Senegal in 1991. They are now present in more than 25 African countries. The group has bigger global ambitions, having acquired a minority stake in a group called Viu that offers streaming in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. They are also the largest shareholder in Scandinavian operator Viaplay.

This is a massive opportunity for the South African film and media industry, where MultiChoice is already entrenched. Stories can be created here and taken to a global audience, not unlike Netflix has done with some of its regional hits. Purely wearing my South African hat here, I would love for this deal to go through.

Considering that MultiChoice was trading at R75 before the initial non-binding discussions in February, the price of R125 is a major premium. I struggle to see a reason why shareholders should not accept this, unless some are trying to be too cute and hoping for a bigger take-out premium down the line if Canal+ lists on the JSE as part of parent company Vivendi potentially splitting its group into several listed entities. Even if that happens, there’s no guarantee of a meaningful premium coming through at that stage. R125 is a good offer, as confirmed by the independent expert declaring it to be fair and reasonable, with valuation work suggesting a range of R113 to R129 per share, with a likely value of R120 per share.

Before we get too carried away here, there are various regulatory approvals required to make this happen. The decision doesn’t lie solely with shareholders. The good news is that the Phuthuma Nathi B-BBEE structure sits at South African subsidiary level, so it is unaffected by this offer. This is yet another excellent reason to structure B-BBEE deals in subsidiaries rather than listed holding companies.

The limitations on control of foreign broadcasting services are less simple. They haven’t quite figured out how this will work yet. Here are the options put forward in the circular:

Those who don’t accept the offer will remain MultiChoice shareholders, but be aware that a 90% acceptance could lead to a squeeze-out scenario that will force remaining shareholders to accept the offer.

The offer is in cash and the bank guarantee of R34.4 billion has been provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank in South Africa. Canal+ already holds 45.2% in MultiChoice, so this amount covers the acquisition of the rest.

In an unusual element of this offer, no irrevocable undertakings have been sought from MultiChoice shareholders.

Perhaps I’m just blind, but I didn’t see a table of costs in the circular. With major international banks on the deal, the fees must be eye-watering. Standard Bank was paid R5 million purely to act as independent expert, which we only know because they disclosed this in their report.


Pan African Resources has agreed a five-year wage deal with NUM (JSE: PAN)

This deal is for employees at Barberton Mines

Pan African Resources has injected some certainty into its expense forecasts through a five-year wage agreement with the National Union of Mineworkers, the representative union for certain categories of employees at Barberton Mines. The deal lasts until 2029 and works out to an average annual increase of 5.3% per annum.

The current deal with UASA (the other union at Barberton Mines) runs until June 2026, providing for increases of between 5% and 6% depending on CPI. If CPI moves lower than 4% or higher than 7.5%, the parties have a once-off opportunity to renegotiate the increase.

The employee share ownership scheme at Barberton Mines was due to mature at the end of June 2024, but early settlement was agreed in March 2024. Over 2,200 employees received final maturity payments, with over R40 million in dividends having been paid to employees during the lifetime of the scheme.


The chickens are flying the coop at RCL Foods (JSE: RCL)

The proposed separate listing of Rainbow Chicken has been announced

This has been a long time coming. RCL Foods has been positioning itself for years to let Rainbow Chicken spread its wings, leaving behind a food business that allows shareholders to choose a risky option (the chicken group) or a safer option (the rest).

Unlike some of the recent activity we’ve seen in which a broken group tries to sell off a good company and list the remaining shares (Transaction Capital – WeBuyCars and the upcoming PicknPay – Boxer deal), this is just a standard unbundling of Rainbow Chicken. The shares will be declared as a dividend in specie to shareholders and will be separately listed. There’s no approval required by shareholders as their exposure to Rainbow Chicken doesn’t change. They simply hold it directly.

Look out for an abridged pre-listing statement on 10 June that will give all the required information about the business ahead of the unbundling on 1 July.


Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • An associate of a director of Collins Property Group (JSE: CPP) bought shares in the company worth R379k.
    • This is a useful signal, so I’m putting it right at the top of this section: a director of a major subsidiary of Stefanutti Stocks (JSE: SSK) bought shares in the company worth R153.7k.
    • The CEO of Sirius Real Estate (JSE: SRE) bought shares in the company worth £9.9k in a self-invested pension. A person closely associated to him also bought shares worth £5k. But then, in a trade going the other way, a senior executive of the company sold shares worth £216k.
    • The company secretary of Tiger Brands (JSE: TBS) received R234k worth of shares in the company under the share incentive scheme and sold the whole lot.
    • The spouse of a director of Astral Foods (JSE: ARL) bought shares in the company worth R73k.
    • Inexplicably, a director of a major subsidiary of PBT Group (JSE: PBG) bought 61 shares in the company at a total amount of R450, without getting clearance from the company. Perhaps he was checking if the button works. Or something.
  • Although Sibanye-Stillwater (JSE: SSW) didn’t release a SENS announcement, there were widespread media reports of an illegal sit-in underground at the Kroondal mine as part of protest action around annual payments under the employee share option scheme. They are not entitled to any such payments, according to the company.
  • Chris Seabrooke is retiring as an independent non-executive director of Transaction Capital (JSE: TCP). He will still be involved in the Mobalyz debt restructure until December 2024.
  • Putprop (JSE: PPR) will move forward with its odd-lot offer at a price of R3.2718040 per share. As there are only 100 shares being repurchased from each shareholder, there’s really no arbitrage opportunity here despite the current market price being R3.20.

Ghost Bites (Brait | Fairvest | Mahube Infrastructure | Marshall Monteagle | MAS | Sirius Real Estate)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:


Brait takes a 17% bath in a single day (JSE: BAT)

Here they are, tapping the market to try fix the balance sheet

Brait’s share price chart is a wonderful way to see exuberance, disappointment and then utter despair all in one place, showing us beautifully when the JSE was fertile ground for investment holding companies that convinced the market that they were Very Clever Indeed and worth investing in:

I’m no technical analyst, but that chart pattern isn’t one that I think you’ll find in many textbooks. It also doesn’t tell the full picture, as those who avoided the absolute murder from the peaks of 2016 still got smashed anyway by the pandemic, with the share price down 95% over the past five years:

It really has been an awful experience. Virgin Active was severely broken by the pandemic, but it’s not like there was an encouraging balance sheet heading into the pandemic.

Although the partial disposal of Premier (which is now separately listed) did wonders for the debt on Brait’s balance sheet, the problem is that it now has convertible bonds and exchangeable bonds that it has little chance of dealing with in the current environment. This has necessitated a recapitalisation of the balance sheet, with the maturities on the bonds extended by three years to December 2027. An equity raise of R1.5 billion will be needed, with the convertible bonds to be repaid up to R150 million and the exchangeable bonds up to R750 million.

Your maths isn’t letting you down. This means they are raising more than they need. They will use the excess for general working capital, investing in existing portfolio companies or repayment of debt.

Does it make sense to do an outsized capital raise when the share price is so depressed? A 17% drop on the day of the announcement probably answers that question.

A strong clue is found in the news that Titan Financial Services (part of the Christo Wiese stable) will underwrite the equity raise in full. No surprise there, with the rights offer priced at a 25% discount to the theoretical ex-rights price. Basically, if you don’t follow your rights, you are donating value to Titan.

The announcement goes on to remind the market that Premier is hoping to pay a maiden final dividend for the year ended March 2024. Over at Virgin Active, the EBITDA run-rate has improved but they are still running below pre-pandemic levels. New Look is reporting flat EBITDA.

All this, a highly leveraged balance sheet and the ever-present risk of a rights offer with Titan swooping in to get more equity? No thanks. I would rather clean the showers at the gym than hold these shares.


Fairvest reports modest growth in the dividends (JSE: FTA | JSE: FTB)

That wasn’t a typo – there are two classes of shares

Fairvest has reported earnings for the six months to March 2024, with like-for-like net property income up by 7%. The loan-to-value ratio has improved to 32.6%, which is a comfortable place for a REIT to be.

Fairvest has two classes of shares, so they report the movement in net asset value (NAV) and the dividend for each class of share. The A shares enjoyed a 13.4% uplift in NAV and 5% growth in the dividend. The B shares weren’t so lucky, with the NAV down 1.5% and the dividend up 1.3%.

The distribution per A share increases by the lesser of 5% or the most recent consumer price index, with the B shares then carrying the variability in underlying earnings. In other words, the B shares ride the wave of good times and bad times.

If you annualise the distribution on the A share, you get a yield of just under 9%. The guidance for the B shares is a full-year distribution of between 41.50 cents and 42.50 cents, with the company expecting to be at the upper end of this. Assuming they hit 42.50 cents, that’s a 10.9% forward yield on the current price of the B shares.

Over the past five years, the A shares did much better than the B shares during tough times:

But over the past year, you can see how improvements in the property sector have driven the B shares:


Mahube Infrastructure reports improved performance in the renewable energy assets (JSE: MHB)

Prepare yourself to read about negative revenue in the base period

You won’t often see a company talk about negative revenue, yet here we are with Mahube Infrastructure pointing out that revenue improved from -R14 million (!) to R68 million. For this to make any sense at all, you need to see the income statement that shows fair value changes in the underlying financial assets going through revenue:

Moving on from this strange situation, we find the company enjoying a more positive narrative around the wind assets, leading to revised forecasts and positive fair value movements. The company has investments in two wind farms and three solar PV farms. The assets sell electricity to Eskom under 20-year power purchase agreements. Dividends received from the investments increased from R18 million in the comparative period to R50.1 million in this period (as you might have noticed in the table), so cash flow into this group has improved.

This was enough for the full-year dividend to be 55 cents per share, up from 45 cents per share in the prior year.

The tangible net asset value is R10.52 vs. R9.91 in the comparable period. The share price of R4.99 is a substantial discount to NAV and a rather appealing dividend yield, but be very careful of the almost non-existent liquidity in the stock.


Marshall Monteagle to sell its stake in a South African tool distributor (JSE: MMP)

The buyer already holds the other 50% in the company

Marshall Monteagle announced that it has agreed to sell its 50% stake in L&G Tool and Machinery Distributors. The stake is held by a subsidiary of the group called Monteagle Merchant Group Southern Holdings. This the entity that will be sold to Des Lyle Family Holdings, which holds the other 50% in L&G.

L&G imports and distributes tools, machinery and household products in South Africa. This isn’t a fit with the rest of Marshall Monteagle’s business, even though the group is a smorgasbord of investments in listed companies, industrial properties and financing and trading businesses internationally. Perhaps L&G simply isn’t a fit because the group isn’t a fan of South African exposure?

Whatever the reason, the price is R64.3 million for the shares and debt in the company. Of this, R13 million is payable up-front and the rest is payable in instalments. Here’s the surprise though: the loan doesn’t carry any interest and they reckon it will take 10 years for the loan to be settled in full, which is an incredibly long time.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a corporate be willing to take exposure for this length of time. It really makes one wonder why they are even bothering to sell the entire stake now vs. selling it off piecemeal as the buyer can afford it. If the equity value of the business tanks, it’s unlikely that the buyer could afford to pay them anyway.

To try and build in some protection, there are some mechanisms to allow the remaining balance on the loan to be adjusted based on the net asset value at certain milestones.

It gets even weirder when you see the numbers for the business. It has net asset value of R12.7 million and profit after tax of just R301k for the year ended March 2023. Although its possible that the bulk of the value sits in the loans rather than the equity (with the related interest charge then crushing profits), it still raises eyebrows that the price for the 50% stake plus the debt is R64.3 million. That’s a big number vs. the profitability.


MAS is telling a more positive story (JSE: MSP)

Key metrics are up and there’s progress on the balance sheet

MAS is a property fund that owns properties in Central and Eastern Europe. That’s a good place to be right now, as evidenced by metrics like 5% growth in like-for-like footfall for the four months to April and tenant sales per square metre growing by 6%. Occupancy cost ratios are steady and there is good demand from tenants, so life is good at the properties themselves.

The problem is the balance sheet, particularly as MAS doesn’t enjoy a credit rating as high as the large funds like NEPI Rockcastle. In a risk-off economic climate, this makes debt difficult and expensive to raise.

MAS took the approach of stopping dividends years ahead of the bond maturities in an effort to avoid a catastrophe down the line. JSE investors panicked when that news came out towards the end of 2023, as this share price chart shows:

The previous estimate assumed that dividends aren’t paid until the debt maturities in June 2026. On that basis, MAS will need at least €414 million in new capital. Since June 2023, MAS has raised €156 million in new secured loans and signed term sheets for secured funding of another €90.5 million. A positive surprise is that a private placement to an existing noteholder raised €40.2 million in April, with those notes maturing in April 2029. They were issued in exchange for the notes maturing in 2026. They do come with more onerous financial covenants, but it shows what is possible to solve the 2026 problem.

A funding structure with PKM Development, in which MAS has 40% of the ordinary equity, obliges MAS to provide funding to PKM in the form of preferred equity. This structure is designed to provide a stream of development properties for MAS, although the latest approach by the joint venture has been to drawdown on the preference shares (which helps MAS earn a return) and use that funding to buy shares in MAS at the price that is currently a deep discount to the NAV per share. That’s a pretty interesting and supportive approach from the joint venture partner.

Those who enjoy unusual situations and who don’t require dividends might want to dig deeper here.


Sirius Real Estate reports decent growth on a per-share basis (JSE: SRE)

It’s very important to look at the per-share numbers, not the total results

When property funds are growing by issuing shares and executing acquisitions, then total revenue etc. will go through the roof because the fund is literally buying earnings. As a shareholder, you need to consider what the per-share growth has been. This is the way to take into account the dilutive impact of the issuance of new shares.

Sirius Real Estate is a very good example of this. Operating profit was up 28.6% and profit before tax was up 32.4% thanks to valuation gains, but funds from operations (FFO) per share (the key metric) was only 2.4% higher. If cash is king, then cash per share is emperor.

The total dividend per share for the year grew by 6.5%, which is a commendable outcome particularly in hard currency.

Adjusted net asset value per share increased by 1.8%.

The net loan-to-value ratio came in at 33.9%, which is much better than 41.6% at March 2023. Shareholders have been supportive of the various corporate actions, which have included acquiring and disposing of properties and raising equity capital.


Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • Carel Vosloo was recently appointed as an alternate director to Jannie Durand at Remgro (JSE: REM) and he has invested heavily in the company’s shares, buying R24.2 million worth of shares in Remgro.
    • A director of a major subsidiary of RFG Holdings (JSE: RFG) sold shares in the company worth R2.5 million.
    • The new CEO of Bytes Technology (JSE: BYI) has bought shares in the company worth almost R1.2 million.
    • A director of Afine Investments (JSE: ANI) bought shares worth R127k.
    • Associates of the CEO of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares with a total value of R41k.
    • There has been further investment by directors of Hammerson (JSE: HMN) under the dividend reinvestment programme. This certainly isn’t as strong a signal as a director investing from funds unrelated to a dividend from the company, but it’s still worth highlighting.
  • I don’t include this as a typical director dealing, as this is an institutional purchase by an investor that has director representation on the board. Still, it’s worth noting that Capitalworks has bought shares in RFG Holdings (JSE: RFG) worth R45.4 million.
  • Between 19 March and 3 June this year, Thungela (JSE: TGA) repurchased shares representing 2.35% of shares in issue. The average price paid was R133.21 per share.
  • Capital & Regional (JSE: CRP) achieved pretty good take-up of the scrip dividend election, which means cash is retained by the company vs. paid out as a dividend. This has a dilutive effect for those who chose to take cash rather than shares. Under this scrip dividend, shares in issue will increase by around 3%.
  • Oando (JSE: OAO) is suspended from trading but is playing catch-up on its reporting. The company has now released results for the year ended December 2023. They reflect a 71% increase in turnover and a swing into profitability.
  • Powerfleet (JSE: PWR) has applied to delist from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The last day of trading of the company’s stock on that exchange will be on August 27th. It will then only be listed on the Nasdaq and the JSE.
  • Salungano (JSE: SLG) released a quarterly progress report, made necessary by the listing being suspended on the JSE. The company is hoping to catch up by July 2024 with the release of interim results to September 2023. They will then need to do FY24 results. The company is dealing with business rescue at Wescoal and court processes around a provisional liquidation hearing for Keaton Mining. And to make everything worse, KPMG suddenly resigned as auditors and the board needs to find a replacement.
  • Tongaat Hulett (JSE: THL) has applied for leave to appeal in the Supreme Court of Appeal against the judgement of the High Court in December 2023 related to the sugar industry levies. If you would like to see what a founding affidavit for the supreme court of appeal looks like, you’ll find it here.

Ghost Stories #39: The only free lunch in investing (with Kingsley Williams)

Listen to the show using this podcast player:

With volatility as the theme in markets in a year of elections, it’s important to keep your head as an equity investor. Take a long-term view and let the market do its job.

Easier said than done, of course.

To assist with practical tips and important insights into key principles in investing (ranging from more basic concepts through to advanced topics like cyclically-adjusted P/E ratios), Kingsley Williams (Chief Investment Officer at Satrix)* joined The Finance Ghost on this podcast.

The only free lunch in investing is diversification. This podcast will help you understand why, brought to you by Satrix.

Full transcript:

The Finance Ghost: Welcome to another episode of the Ghost Stories podcast. This is being recorded just after the elections in South Africa, so of course that is what is on everyone’s mind. Before getting onto this podcast I had to actually stop myself laughing because of all the memes I was seeing on Twitter, now X. Got to say that of all the social media platforms, that is the place to be during something like an election. It really is just the very best content. But of course we need a serious face for this chat Kingsley, and you know, that’s a good time to point out that Kingsley Williams of Satrix is joining me on this discussion and those election headlines are exactly why we are here, right?

You wrote a piece that went into Ghost Mail earlier this month about not losing your head through all the volatility and through all the chaos in the headlines. The memes are one thing, but there’s plenty of fearmongering and lots of scariness. I mean, just today we’re seeing retailers on the JSE are down hard. The bond yields have been all over the place. The rand has been all over the place. Welcome to volatility, which is of course part of investing. So Kingsley, thank you very much for joining on this podcast and I’m very excited as always to tap into your experience.

Kingsley Williams: Thanks for having me Ghost, and looking forward to the conversation. We definitely do know how to laugh at ourselves on X and Twitter. It helps manage the chaos I guess.

The Finance Ghost: I think that’s the best thing about South Africans – we deal with so much but we are so very good at just pointing a bit of fun at things, while I think people overseas just think “how can you laugh at that?” And then we do things like laugh at people overseas. I really enjoyed Rishi announcing the UK election in the rain. I thought that was the most British thing I’ve ever seen in my life. They send him out in his suit into the pouring rain to announce an election day. Politics everywhere are just chaotic.

And maybe that’s a good place to start actually, because I think as South Africans we do fall into this trap of thinking everything here is broken, everything overseas is perfect. There was a huge emigration wave of people who went overseas in the hope of a better life. And a lot of them got it right and a lot of them, frankly, didn’t. And the more people you actually speak to and the more you travel and the more worldly you become as you get older, you realise – or at least I have, I’m interested to get your view – there’s a lot of opportunity in South Africa and there’s a lot of stuff to feel good about. There’s a lot of stuff to feel very upset about. But on the whole nowhere is perfect, right?

Kingsley Williams: 100%. I was actually very, very fortunate to have spent about 18 months overseas, both in the US, in New York and in London for just over a year, about 13 months in the UK at the start of my career. But that was early 2000s. Some say I was responsible for the .com bubble and crash because I was working in technology in New York at the time, not in financial services. Well, not on the trading floor.

The Finance Ghost: That must have been amazing.

Kingsley Williams: Well, I was working on the trading floor but on the technology side, so not actually pulling the trigger on any trades, so I had nothing to do with the global .com bubble and that bursting. Obviously South Africa was at a very different place back then. The economy was growing, there was real growth. Our market was absolutely smashing it relative to what other markets were doing. If you look at a cumulative chart going back to the early 2000s and plot that relative to the likes of S&P 500 or MSCI World, it looks nothing like what it’s looked like for the last 10-12 years post the global financial crisis where it’s all been offshore, it’s been driving markets and we’ve been rather pedestrian.

My heart wanted to actually come back to South Africa and it’s worked out very well for me personally. I think there’s a lot to be said for being home and I think when Africa gets into your blood, as much as we’ve got numerous problems here, it’s always wonderful to come back and enjoy the quality of life that we do have here, warts and all.

The Finance Ghost: I couldn’t agree more. And of course that 2000s bull market is what created a lot of the financial infrastructure we know and love today. There were loads more companies listed on the JSE. Unfortunately, the trend in that has been very much down since then. The rand, if you are one of the younger listeners to this podcast, go and look at what the rand was trading at to the dollar in the 2000s when FIFA was the unofficial president for those last few years leading up to the World Cup, it’s quite depressing, obviously. Then of course Wall Street broke the world after the tech guys broke the world a few years prior, and emerging markets have struggled since then, but especially, I think, South Africa.

Despite all of that, you have to recognise that all emerging markets are volatile things and they have the potential to do well. You just have to learn to tread a bit more carefully, but also to try and lift your head sometimes from the noise, and to recognise that often the noise creates an opportunity as opposed to something to panic about. Which was really the gist of your article that was in Ghost Mail recently, to say just be careful trying to be too clever with timing the market and the panic selling and everything else. Over time these become quite value destructive activities and unfortunately it’s a trap that people fall into all the time.

Kingsley Williams: As you’re chatting through that, I’m reminded of another quote by Eugene Fama. So I’m really going to name drop here. I was very fortunate to spend three months at the University of Chicago’s Graduate School of Business. Now it’s called the Booth School of Business, which is where Eugene Fama is a professor and he’s a Nobel Prize winner as well, in finance. But I came across a quote of his fairly recently where he was making the point – I’m going to paraphrase, I can’t remember exactly how he phrased it – but he was making the point that if you start getting anxious about volatility in equity markets, then you probably shouldn’t have been invested in equity markets in the first place. It is the norm.

It comes with the territory of investing in risky, growth-type equity linked instruments. Volatility is part and parcel of the package. It’s the norm, it’s not the exception. It should be expected. And so one needs to think very carefully about how you structure your portfolio. Are you positioning it on the basis of perhaps a recent period where the market has only been going in one direction with unusually low volatility? Or are you looking at the full history of what markets are typically going to deliver – and they are inherently risky. You can lose capital and you should be invested for a long period of time. I think those are some of the the things, almost a bit like death and taxes, that never change when you’re investing in equity markets. That is part and parcel of the journey that you’re signing up for. And you need to be willing to be invested for a material portion of time, for the long term, in excess of five years, ideally ten years or longer.

And you need to be willing to be invested for a material portion of time, for the long term, in excess of five years, ideally ten years or longer.

The Finance Ghost: Absolutely. Otherwise you need to be able to look at this and say, “hey, I’m a short term trader”, but that’s a completely different skill set. I think where people really hurt themselves is they go, “I’m an investor”, but then they behave like a trader. And those two things can be very, very, very dangerous. If you are trading, then recognise that that is what you are doing and it’s a completely different skill. It’s a great skill and it’s a lot of fun, but it’s not the same as investing. And I think that’s one of the main challenges. Right?

Kingsley Williams: Correct. So maybe one way of looking at it is, if you’re investing, you want to be building up an asset base, letting compounding and time in the market work its magic and ultimately build up that wealth base and asset base for some future goal, ideally retirement. But you might have other longer term goals that you’re investing for. Whereas I see trading as almost a business. It’s something that you’re making a return on every day or trying to make a return on every day. So its a very different mindset. Investing is putting money away as a nest egg for you at some later point. Trading is almost a daily business, which, as you rightly pointed out, is a very different type of endeavour.

The Finance Ghost: Absolutely. And you won’t often hear traders talk about position sizing, which is kind of a diversification thing. It’s like a value-at-risk. But in investing, you’ll hear people talk about diversification primarily, which is a combination of position sizing and also where your money is – just as simple as that.

In the last week or so, Bidcorp produced an update, and I thought it was really interesting because Bidcorp is one of our true global success stories. So it’s the food services giant that was basically incubated in Bidvest. They make very little of their money in South Africa. They are all over the show, which is just wonderful. And they are still doing loads of bolt-on acquisitions. And interestingly enough, they did another acquisition here in South Africa. One of the other things that they mentioned in their recent update was that South Africa is actually one of their standout emerging markets right now in terms of how it’s performing. So there’s Bidcorp sitting with this whole lens on the world. And yes, they are South African at heart. But they’ve got people everywhere in the world scouting for opportunities, clearly. And they are still happy to allocate capital to South Africa, which I think tells you something. Just because US tech has had this incredible couple of years, it doesn’t mean it’ll do that forever. And it can’t do those compound annual growth rates forever. It’s just not possible. Go and look at Apple and go look how much of their return over the past decade has been from earnings growth and how much has been from multiple expansion. The multiple expansion has a ceiling. There’s only so much that someone is willing to pay per dollar of earnings that comes out of Apple. That’s just how it is.

But they’ve got people everywhere in the world scouting for opportunities, clearly. And they are still happy to allocate capital to South Africa, which I think tells you something. Just because US tech has had this incredible couple of years, it doesn’t mean it’ll do that forever.

I’m definitely not saying that Apple is going to necessarily be a disappointment or anything like that. I have a bunch of US stocks in my portfolio. But you’ve got to be super careful about extrapolating the age of the smartphone forever and also extrapolating that South Africa is going to underperform forever. If a business like Bidcorp can see the value in doing another acquisition here and building a global base, would you agree that that’s probably the way people should also think about their equity portfolio, as it really helps to actually be diversified and to have both local and global exposure, rather than assuming that something will always be good or always be bad?

Kingsley Williams: You were touching on multiples, which I think is a very important point to unpack. There’s some research done by Schiller. I stand to be corrected, he may have also won a Nobel Prize in finance, but he came up with this concept called the cyclically adjusted PE ratio, abbreviated as the CAPE. And basically it’s a ten year average price earnings ratio. The research that he did confirmed that there’s a very high correlation between what that long-term PE ratio, average PE ratio is over time versus the subsequent ten year returns. So to your point, the US is trading at all-time high PE ratios, which gives us an indication that future returns over the next ten years are likely to be depressed. Because where is that growth going to come from to sustain such a high PE ratio?

So yes, we take the point. The US is one of the most innovative countries and very market friendly. And so it probably has the greatest potential to unlock future earnings and future growth. But growth is not infinite. There’s fundamental underpins to unlocking growth and that can’t continue indefinitely. And given where the US market is trading now from a PE ratio perspective and a valuation perspective relative to the history of the US itself, which has always been an innovative market that has been at the forefront of driving economic growth, it’s very unlikely that it’s going to deliver outsized returns over the next ten years relative to very depressed markets such as South Africa, which is trading at very low PE ratios, which again by our own history provides a good indication that there should be outsized returns going forward.

Given that our market is pretty much priced for – I don’t know if the right term is to say “perfection” – to deliver those outsized returns because it is so depressed at the moment in terms of the valuations that our local market is commanding. I do think there’s a lot of opportunity in South Africa. But again, you wouldn’t want to have all your long-term investments pinned on one economy, particularly the South African economy, being so small relative to the global opportunity set that is available.

Just as you were also talking about, Bidcorp and where they’re finding opportunities, I watched an interview with Sean Summers and Alec Hogg a while ago, after he’d recently taken the helm at Pick ‘n Pay. They’re obviously going through some of their own challenges in restructuring that business and positioning it to gain its historical place that it used to have within the retail landscape in South Africa. And he was just making the point about where to live and considering emigrating and being based in a developed market. And he made the point that it’s a lot easier to make -what’s the current exchange rate? 24 rand to a pound, give or take – it’s a lot easier to make 24 rand net profit here in South Africa than it is to make a pound net profit in the UK. So yeah, I think there is a lot of opportunity. The market is not as competitive here as you would find in developed markets, and that creates the opportunity for businesses to solve problems, to meet customers needs, which is essentially what business is all about. It’s solving a need and earning a return for doing so and for taking that risk. So there definitely is a lot of opportunity in South Africa and good growth prospects given the valuations that our market’s commanding at the moment.

The Finance Ghost: And this is where ETFs are interesting tools, to plug those gaps and to give you the broad exposure where you specifically want single stock exposure. You can then take that on top of your underlying ETF building blocks – that’s certainly the way I use ETFs, as building blocks for a portfolio. It’s that beautiful equity exposure with one click across a whole bunch of things. And then where you want to take single stock positions, which obviously is a particular passion point of mine, but takes a lot of time and effort, as opposed to just building out that equity exposure over time, there’s loads of ways to diversify within the ETFs as well.

…that’s certainly the way I use ETFs, as building blocks for a portfolio. It’s that beautiful equity exposure with one click across a whole bunch of things.

It’s important to do that over time because I think when things then happen, like scary headlines or elections in a particular country or whatever, you’re not sitting with absolutely every cent you’ve ever made in South African retailers, which are down 5% today or whatever the case is. And then you panic and you go, “geez, this is going to zero, I’m going to sell everything”, take a 5% bath and then a week later it’s back and you go, “oh, this is so frustrating”. I mean, the one I’m kicking myself on so much is Bytes Technology. I didn’t sell after their whole disaster with their ex-CEO and all those undisclosed trades. But I should absolutely have bought more. I don’t know why I didn’t. It was so obvious. The share price panicked because the CEO made some bad trades. I mean, he’s not the business. He will leave and someone else will come in anyway. Hindsight is perfect, but rather the hindsight is, “‘oh, I wish I’d taken advantage of that and made money”, as opposed to, “oh my gosh, I sold everything and panicked and now here I am sitting in cash and I’ve given up 20% returns and incurred transaction fees and tax and everything else”, right?

Kingsley Williams: I think this talks exactly to Buffett’s quote around being contrarian. So I think we should unpack his quote in more detail because his quote is often used as the raison d’etre or a call to be active and to be contrarian. He was actually making the point that you’re probably going to be best served by holding the broad market almost on a passive basis.

I never like referring to any investing as passive. It all requires active decisions. But just owning the market, as our payoff line says, just owning the broad market and let the market do its work. If you really, really still want to be active, well then be contrarian. Buy when everyone else is selling. Like when Sasol had been decimated down to – I can’t remember what its low was, I think it was like 20-something rand at a point – that’s the time to be buying, right? That’s the time to be piling it.

The Finance Ghost: That’s one that I bought.

Kingsley Williams: Okay, well done.

The Finance Ghost: That one I got.

Kingsley Williams: If you’re going to be contrarian, if you’re going to be active, then be contrarian. And this is really the underpin of value investing.

It’s buying the unloved stocks, it’s buying the unloved markets like South Africa, because that’s where the rerating potential in stocks or in broad indices can occur. You just need a little bit of confidence to creep back in for there to be risk on globally, which could happen when interest rates start getting cut, potentially for some positive policies to be implemented locally that are market friendly, for that confidence to start creeping in. And then it’s not that companies need to be earning any more or making any more profits, just that multiple, that PE ratio can kick up and that can unlock enormous returns going forward.

I think letting the market do its job has a huge role to play, but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t opportunities from being contrarian. The other thing I also wanted to just mention around single stocks is we were chatting to a client, and I hope you won’t mind me repeating the story. I won’t mention his name, but he was looking at wanting to get rand play exposure. So buying the SA Inc.-type stocks into his portfolio, which he did do.

But the problem with single stocks, or only a handful of single stocks, is that your fortunes are very much tied to idiosyncratic factors associated with those specific companies. So if you’re looking at getting a broad style or theme expressed in your portfolio – that, yeah, I want to own SA Inc.-type stocks because I think the rand is going to strengthen, for example – if you only have a very concentrated portfolio expressing that theme, that theme may indeed play out, but you can be completely derailed with idiosyncratic events and drivers affecting those specific companies that have nothing to do with that broad theme. Again, this talks to why you want to have a broad portfolio, which an ETF or an index fund offers you to capture that type of theme. So that even if there is idiosyncratic noise or some stock-specific anomaly that occurs, that isn’t your entire portfolio or your entire trade that’s being carried out by that. You’re expressing that view with a broad portfolio.

The Finance Ghost: I can give you another perfect example of that: gold miners. You could have had this view to say, “oh, gold is going up”, and then you went and picked one gold miner and then that gold miner has some major weather event or some operational disaster. And then you watch gold tick up exactly like you thought it was going to and you watch all the other miners tick up beautifully, normally in excess of the gold price because of operating leverage and everything else, you can get a leveraged-up exposure to what happens there. Meanwhile you are languishing because you were unlucky and you picked the wrong one. It really does depend why you’re investing. If you are trying to get a theme, then doing it through one company is not necessarily the right way to go. If you’re trying to get to a specific company’s story, often something like where it’s trading in terms of average multiple, that should absolutely be part of your investment decision. And unfortunately that data is not easy to get. I subscribe to TIKR, so that’s one of the better ways to get a Bloomberg-light or a Capital IQ-light for a retail investor. It still costs money, but at least I can go and do stuff like pull average valuations over time. Without that knowledge, you go and look at a point estimate. Okay, it’s on a PE of eight. Oh great. What does that mean? Has it historically been on a PE of six? Has it historically been on PE of ten? Where are you versus the average? What is the likely mean reversion on this multiple? And what does that mean for you? Because you can have a situation where earnings growth is really strong, but if the multiple was too high and it unwinds down to its average, you’re going to get a pretty dire return anyway.

The other mistake that people make is they look at the dividend yield and they think, “wow, there’s this great juicy dividend yield. This thing’s going to pay me 8% a year just for being there, let alone the capital growth”. But then they don’t think about the capital growth. So British American Tobacco, exhibit A, something I’m relatively bearish on because yes, it pays a good divvy, but what is happening to their customer base? I mean, we know what’s happening to their customer base, right? There’s every chance that the share price performs poorly over time. Yes, they pay you dividends along the way. What does your total return look like? And where else could you have gotten a better total return than that for taking single stock risk? Because the other thing which talks to your point about the risks is if the index will pay you 10% but a single stock is paying you 10%, you’re not winning by owning the single stock. It’s not even a draw. You’ve actually lost because on a risk adjusted basis, you’ve done worse. Single stocks need to offer you materially more than the index, right?

Kingsley Williams: The other big risk, just talking about dividends, but I guess any metric that you look at based on reported financial statements, is that they’re backwards looking. So it’s not to say that there isn’t a premium by looking at that data. I mean, we harvest valuation premiums, momentum premiums, quality premiums that are available in the market by looking at reported information on these companies. But the important thing is that it needs to be a broadly diversified portfolio because of the risk in individual companies. It might look like a great value stock, but it could be a value trap. Similarly, it might be a great dividend payer, but if you’re looking at what the historical dividend yield is, there’s absolutely no guarantee that that company will declare a similar dividend at the next payout period, particularly if their earnings are under pressure, they’re going to start cutting that.

Similarly, it might be a great dividend payer, but if you’re looking at what the historical dividend yield is, there’s absolutely no guarantee that that company will declare a similar dividend at the next payout period, particularly if their earnings are under pressure, they’re going to start cutting that.

You’re looking at something that looks fantastic in terms of where the market’s pricing that stock now and what the yield is going to be. But there’s no guarantee that that yield is going to be paid in the next dividend round. So, again, very important to diversify, diversify, diversify. It’s the only free lunch you get in investing, because we just cannot predict these once-off idiosyncratic-type risks. There could be a mining disaster, or some dam bursts its banks and takes out whatever. These things are not predictable. That’s exactly why you want to diversify your investments in your portfolio, to hedge yourself against those risks and then let the market do its work in terms of how you’re structuring your portfolio, where you’re capturing themes or styles in a broadly diversified way.

The Finance Ghost: Absolutely. I love all of that. While we’re having fun here, I think I’d like to finish off this podcast by talking about some of your advice for the listeners around managing their behavioral bias to panic. You read a tough headline and you think, “oh, my goodness, this is it. Let me get my money out while I can”. What sort of advice have you got for the listeners on just keeping their heads in difficult situations in specifically, equity markets, although fixed income can dish that up, too. But generally, institutions are dealing with fixed income volatility because of the nature of investing in bonds. Having said that, we’ve done some great shows with Siya on bond ETFs at Satrix, so you can get involved in that, too. And it’s a very interesting thing to look at. It’s not just equity volatility, actually, it’s any investment volatility. What would your advice be to help people avoid panicking?

Kingsley Williams: I think it starts with having a plan at the outset, like knowing why you’re investing, knowing how long you’re investing for, to achieve that particular goal. Now, once you know those things, you can then start structuring your portfolio in an appropriate way in relation to that term. If you’re saving for your retirement in 20 years time, for example, to my earlier point and the point that Eugene Fama made, volatility will come with that territory if you’re exposed to risky assets, and if you’re worried about that volatility, well, then you shouldn’t have been in risky assets in the first place. It is part and parcel of what investing in risky assets comes with. So I think that’s the first point. Have a plan and know what your term is for investing. Your pension fund and your RAs and all of those types of things which are really only designed for access once you retire – those you shouldn’t be worried about. Decide what your investment strategy is going to be and then let the market take its course.

Obviously, if your circumstances change or you come up with a different approach to the way you want to achieve your investment goals, well, then by all means reflect that in your portfolio. But hopefully your plans are reasonably future-proof and are not hinging on current news. It’s more long-term in nature. Just some practical things: resist the urge to act. The analogy we use is, or that I often like to refer to is changing lanes in traffic, trying to get an edge. Yeah, you might get there a bit quicker, but you’re definitely going to use a lot more fuel. You’re probably going to be a lot more stressed by the time you get to your destination, and then it’s not a guarantee that you’re going to get there much quicker. You do see people weaving out and in fact, you may not get there at all because you might end up causing an accident. So just resist the urge to act. Stick to your long-term plan. Very important: don’t chase past winners because you actually want to be buying the ones that are in distress. That’s what unlocks the outsized returns, not necessarily chasing the past winners. If you are going to chase past winners, like in a momentum type strategy, you have to be very disciplined at constantly doing that and churning your portfolio. I mean, we do run a momentum strategy in both ETF and unit trust form. We employ momentum as a style within our multi-factor portfolios, so it can be harnessed, but it requires a lot of discipline and rigor.

And again, managing risk, very important because what’s the saying that Nico always uses? Momentum’s your friend until the bend at the end. So watch out for that bend, watch out for that market event that you can’t predict that is going to carry you out on a momentum-type strategy. And then the other thing is not being too defensive. If you’ve got time on your side, use that time to your advantage. Use the power of equity markets, which over the long term are your best option for delivering inflation-beating returns or the highest inflation-beating returns. If you’re worried about volatility, but you’ve got 20, 10, 20 years of time to invest for being too conservative is actually your biggest risk. It’s a bit of a oxymoron. You’re trying to manage risk, but your biggest risk is being too conservative because you’ve got time on your side and the longer you give your investments, the less risky they become.

The Finance Ghost: That’s your driving analogy, that would be leaving your car in the garage and just never going anywhere because you don’t have to think about the lanes. I agree, that’s not a great outcome either. And the last thing I’ll leave people with is that distinguishing between saving and investing helps you so much with managing the volatility. You can’t save into equities. That is not saving, that is investing. Saving is what you do in your call account with your bank, so that when something breaks in your house or you need to upgrade your car or you need to pay school fees or whatever it is you want to do, go overseas, that comes out of your savings account. Investing is what you do with the rest of your money. So I hate the term tax-free savings account – it kills me. It should be tax-free investing account. It drives completely the wrong behaviour to call it a TFSA, but unfortunately that’s the route government took with it. That’s the thing to understand is the money that goes into the equity market is money that you are going to pull down on in a long time from now. It’s not savings. And I think if you do that, you manage so much of the volatility.

Kingsley Williams: Maybe just one other point that we didn’t really get to touch on Ghost, was just how structuring your portfolio, which to my earlier point was coming up with a plan, to the extent that that is well-diversified, it will smooth out that volatility because you’re not going to be exposed to one driver or one style or one theme, which may or may not do well. You’re going to be exposed to different asset classes, different themes, different styles, which all pay off at different times. And to the extent that they’re lowly or negatively correlated with each other helps to smooth that overall portfolio experience. That helps manage the investor behaviour, because now, whenever you do happen to look at your portfolio, you’re not seeing it having lost whatever crazy percent of value, because by its design, it is well diversified. So when global equities or US tech is shooting the lights out, that’s counteracting the fact that bonds may have caused a drag. But similarly, if US tech goes through a wobble, that’s hopefully going to be counteracted by having bonds in your portfolio. So again, designing a well-diversified portfolio helps to actually manage those behavioral biases so that you’re less inclined to want to act because it’s giving you a far more smoothed return profile.

The Finance Ghost: Kingsley, thank you so much for your time on this podcast. I’ve really enjoyed it. I think tons of great insights shared here, so thank you for that. And to our listeners, we’re going to start releasing these podcasts with full transcripts because I think there’s a strong proportion of people who want to read the content now as well as listen to it, or instead of listen to it if they’re struggling to find the time. So keep an eye out for transcripts going forward. But just for future notice, there will be transcripts and Kingsley, thank you for these insights. It’s been really great to have you back on the show. All the best in the markets, and I’ve no doubt we’ll do this again. And if people do want to reach out to you, you are on LinkedIn from memory.

Kingsley Williams: That’s correct, and thanks very much for having me. Been great to engage with you and speak to your fan base, your listeners.

The Finance Ghost: And for final comment, Robert Schiller won the 2013 Nobel Prize for economics at the same time as Eugene Fama and a gentleman called Lars Peter Hansen, who sounds like a rally driver, but he’s clearly a bit more interesting than that and does some economic stuff as well. So Kingsley, thank you so much for your time. We will do this again.

Indexation: Anything but Passive.Take control of what you're investing in by incorporating indexation into your portfolio. Satrix - Own the market

*Satrix is a division of Sanlam Investment Management.

Disclaimer

Satrix Investments (Pty) Ltd is an approved FSP in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS). The information does not constitute advice as contemplated in FAIS. Use or rely on this information at your own risk. Consult your Financial Adviser before making an investment decision.

Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd (Satrix) is a registered and approved Manager in Collective Investment Schemes in Securities.

While every effort has been made to ensure the reasonableness and accuracy of the information contained in this document (“the information”), the FSPs, their shareholders, subsidiaries, clients, agents, officers and employees do not make any representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or suitability of the information and shall not be held responsible and disclaim all liability for any loss, liability and damage whatsoever suffered as a result of or which may be attributable, directly or indirectly, to any use of or reliance upon the information.

Ghost Bites (Adcorp | African Media Entertainment | AYO | Brikor | Crookes Brothers | Dis-Chem | Finbond | Gemfields | Huge | Insimbi | Lewis Group | Nedbank | Trustco)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:


Adcorp’s profits are under pressure (JSE: ADR)

This is a perfect example of a group that is swimming upstream

Adcorp has released results for the year ended February 2024 and they reflect difficulties in the business, particularly on the professional services side in both South Africa and Australia.

It feels like blue collar labour solutions still have a place in the market, but professional skills can be attracted in many ways beyond the traditional route of working with recruitment firms like Adcorp. Just think of LinkedIn and how powerful that platform has become in connecting talent with opportunities.

To give you an idea of how tough things have been for Adcorp for several years now, this year is the second consecutive year of revenue growth and this is the first time they’ve achieved this rather basic goal since 2016!

Although revenue from continuing operations was up 7.7%, margins came under pressure and gross profit was down 2%. This led to a decline in operating profit from continuing operations of 21.5%. HEPS from continuing operations fell sharply from 147.8 cents to 83.8 cents, a decline of over 43%.

The strength of the balance sheet means that although HEPS declined, the final dividend is up from 16.1 cents per share to 24.2 cents per share.


Radio assets drive African Media Entertainment forward (JSE: AME)

Algoa FM and OFM both grew EBITDA by 16%

For the year ended March 2024, African Media Entertainment can feel proud of a result that saw revenue move 8% higher and HEPS jump by 63%. That’s the kind of operating leverage that shareholders want to see.

Cash conversion was excellent, with operating profit of R56.9 million and cash from operating activities of R64.9 million. This gave the group the confidence to repurchase R6.9 million worth of shares during the period. In addition to the interim dividend of R1.00 per share, there’s a final dividend of R3.50 per share. This takes the total dividend for the year to R4.50, so the share price of R44.00 is a trailing dividend yield of just over 10%.

Algoa FM and OFM were the highlights of this result, each growing EBITDA by 16% year-on-year. Some of the other assets assets are struggling in a changing media environment, needing to find new ways to generate revenue.


AYO Technology has reduced its losses (JSE: AYO)

But the remaining losses are still substantial

AYO Technology released results for the six months to February 2024. They reflect a modest uptick in revenue (growth of just 0.19%) and a drop in gross margins. Despite this, the impact of cost saving initiatives (including retrenchments) means that the headline loss per share has improved from 79.13 cents to 33.12 cents.

A rather interesting nugget in the numbers is a 22% increase in revenue in the unified communications division, which distributes AV products and gaming equipment for brands like Logitech. They reckon that the hybrid work culture has led to significant investment by companies in virtual meeting hardware.

There are no fewer than three pages of disclosures related to litigation, ranging from various banks through to the South African Clothing and Textile Worker’s Union and Daily Maverick!


Brikor had a much better financial year (JSE: BIK)

The core bricks segment led the way

Brikor has released results for the year ended February 2024. Revenue increased by 12.4% to R350.4 million, with the bricks segment up by 6.8% to R226 million and the coal segment up 24.4% to R124.5 million.

The bricks segment makes the bulk of the profit though, with operating profit up from R15.7 million to R24.5 million. Coal improved from an operating loss of R5.8 million to an operating loss of R0.6 million.

At group level, this small cap saw HEPS come in at 1.3 cents per share, an improvement from a loss of 0.1 cents in the comparable period. The net asset value per share is 13.9 cents.

The share price at R0.16 is therefore higher than where you would expect to see it trading based on these numbers. The mandatory offer by Nikkel Trading that was completed at the start of the year was at a price of R0.17 per share, so the share price appears to still be anchored by that offer.


Crookes Brothers flags much sweeter numbers (JSE: CKS)

Sugar cane and bananas for the win

Primary agriculture group Crookes Brothers gives us a great example of how volatile agriculture actually is. This is firmly a feast-or-famine situation, being the industry from which the term comes from in the first place.

The year ended March 2024 was a feast, with HEPS of 334.50 cents vs. a headline loss of 708.80 cents in the comparable year. Over two years, this means that the group still made a loss. That aside, the improvement came from the sugar cane and banana operations, along with a reduction in fertilizer and other agricultural input costs.


A modest HEPS performance at Dis-Chem (JSE: DCP)

They are going to need to get tighter on costs while expanding the business and making acquisitions

Dis-Chem has a strong business, but they cannot afford to become complacent on costs. For the 12 months to February 2024, a decent revenue result of 11.1% growth couldn’t be translated into a strong HEPS performance.

HEPS as reported was down 1.6%, but that includes the distortion of a major once-off property gain in the base period. If we adjust for that, then HEPS would’ve been up by 3.8%. That’s a positive result but still a concern in terms of margin contraction.

The Dis-Chem announcement goes into great detail on the two halves of the year, showing that the first half in the base period was incredibly strong vs. averages. This is why the full-year numbers look better than the interim numbers did.

Retail revenue was up 9.7%, which is a solid result when you consider that COVID vaccine revenue was still in the base. If you split that out, revenue was up 10.3%. Comparable pharmacy store revenue growth was 6.9%, so they are doing well even without the impact of new stores. Retail total income was up 9.3%, with the margin contraction attributable to increased promotional activity to ensure market share retention. This is something to keep an eye on.

Wholesale revenue increased by 13.3%, including external revenue to independent pharmacies and The Local Choice franchises up by 21.4%. That’s a great top-line result. Total income was up 10.9%, with margins ever so slightly higher if you exclude the property gain from the base.

The concern is in expenses, which grew 10.9% vs. the comparable period. Although they make reference to pressures like load shedding, the biggest area of focus is staff costs that account for 62% of retail expenses excluding depreciation. Staff costs were up 8% for the year, split across 9.7% in the first half and 6.4% in the second half. They will hopefully maintain the better control that was seen in the second half.

Retail expenses were up 11% and wholesale expenses were up 8%.

Brace yourself for the jump in net financing costs, up by 25.6%. If you exclude IFRS 16 leases and interest on new term loans related to warehouse acquisitions, net finance costs were up 94.1% due to pressure on working capital (inventory increased by 12.7%) and higher interest rates. This is an expensive operating environment for retailers.

None of these pressures are slowing Dis-Chem down, with R869 million invested in expansionary capital expenditure vs. only R158 million in replacement expenditure. Of the expansionary capital, R502 million was for a new distribution centre in Gauteng.

Heading into the new financial year, revenue has increased by 11.4% year-on-year for the first three months of trading. Aside from cost control, the focus will be on ongoing expansion in the business and an improvement in working capital ratios. They also have significant ambitions in the digital space in health and in building out an integrated health ecosystem, including with the acquisition of a life insurance business.

The business in question is OneSpark Holdings, which is incorporated in Delaware. Related party deals never seem to be far away at Dis-Chem, with the Saltzman family and a couple of other directors having a financial interest in OneSpark. It’s likely that they acted as venture capital investors in that regard and have grown the business to the point where it makes sense for Dis-Chem to invest. Encouragingly, the investment takes the form of a share subscription of R156 million for a 50% stake, rather than a purchase of shares from those investors. In other words, the capital is flowing into OneSpark. This is much better than giving one of the other investors an exit.

This is proper start-up territory, as OneSpark made a loss for the four months to April of R25.3 million. These types of businesses in the digital space burn capital at an incredible rate. On that note, Dis-Chem has committed to subscribe for preference shares in OneSpark from time to time for R200 million.

PwC was appointed as independent expert and they have opined that the terms of the transaction are fair to Dis-Chem shareholders.

Finally, in a third announcement for the day, the Saltzman family confirmed that a deal has been done with key management of Dis-Chem that will see up to 3.75% of shares in the company change hands. The Saltzman family will vendor finance this at no cost to Dis-Chem. The executives are subject to a 4-year lock-up with incremental vesting over a subsequent 5 years. This is a win for minority shareholders in the group, as management is basically being locked in thanks to the Saltzmans rather than the company needing to put in place an expensive additional share scheme.


Finbond: not quite break-even at HEPS level yet (JSE: FGL)

They are much closer, though

The Finbond share price has had a rollercoaster year. Currently, it’s up 40% over 12 months, but the start date matters a great deal. The share price has bounced between roughly 30 cents and 49 cents a share, currently at 42 cents. Limited liquidity and a wide bid-offer spread is part of why it stays stuck in a range.

The recent interest in the company has come from improved financial performance. Although there’s still no dividend for 2024, the headline loss per share came in at a much lower 0.4 cents vs. 19.1 cents in the comparable period. This was driven by a revenue increase of 22.8%. Profit before tax was actually positive, so the group has made a song and dance about a return to profitability despite there still being a headline loss.

The performance is being driven mainly by the South African business, with the American business taking time to come right. There are good reasons to believe in the momentum in the American operations, particularly as it takes a while for growth in the book to reflect as growth in profits because of the way the accounting works.


Gemfields enjoys resilient pricing for emeralds (JSE: GML)

But these numbers were skewed by unsold lots at this auction being of lower quality

Gemfields has announced results from the May emerald auction, which achieved auction revenue of $35 million. 93% of lots on offer were sold, with a couple of lower quality lots going unsold. Although pricing per carat was even higher than the previous record auction, the company points out that this was skewed by the unsold lots. Pricing was strong in this auction but not as strong as in the previous auction if you take the unsold lots into account.

The next auction is for mixed-quality rubies in June, followed by commercial-quality emeralds in September.


Huge Group sees a modest uptick in NAV (JSE: HUG)

Not sure it matters though, as the market largely ignores the NAV

Investment holding companies tend to trade at significant discounts to NAV. This is for various reasons, including the costs at the centre. In some cases, it’s because the market simply doesn’t believe the NAV.

At Huge Group, the name is a good way to remember the extent of the discount. The NAV as at February 2024 was 964.54 cents and the share price is R2.20, a huge gap indeed.

Just one reason why this might be the case can be found in the note dealing with the fair value of investments held. For example, the preferences shares in subsidiary Huge Connect are valued using a required rate of return of 10.75%. This is lower than the SA 10 year government bond yield!

Nobody is going to take a company seriously when an asset representing more than a third of total holdings on the balance sheet is valued as though it carries lower risk than government debt.

For what it’s worth, the NAV per share of 964.54 cents is 2.2% higher year-on-year.

No dividends have been declared and perhaps more importantly, no shares were repurchased. At this discount to NAV, all that Huge should be doing is trying to recycle capital at the values put forward by management and repurchase shares with the proceeds at a deep discount to that NAV.


Insimbi’s numbers have deteriorated sharply (JSE: ISB)

Higher finance costs and lower EBITDA aren’t a great combo

Insimbi Industrial Holdings reported numbers for the year ended February 2024 and they aren’t great at all. Revenue is down 2%, which is a recipe for serious trouble in a business with tiny operating profit margins. Sure enough, operating profit dropped by 38%, with R15 million of the R77 million decrease being attributable to a non-recurring gain in the prior period.

However you cut it, a 34% decrease in EBITDA at a time of higher interest rates and and an increase in working capital isn’t what shareholders wanted to see. HEPS fell by 54% and the dividend was down 69% for the year, with no final dividend declared.

The company will hope that the global focus on cleaner metals leads to higher copper and aluminium prices, as this is a net positive for the business. They will also need to do what they can to bring debt down, as a business with so much operating leverage really shouldn’t be running financial leverage as well.


At Lewis, credit sales continue to fuel growth (JSE: LEW)

There’s an impressive increase in the dividend

Lewis Group released results for the year ended March 2024. They managed to accelerate in the fourth quarter, taking the full-year merchandise sales growth to 4.7%. Traditional retail grew by 6.9%, but UFO fell by a nasty 12.6%, leading to an impairment of the remaining goodwill in UFO.

This talks to the trend that has underpinned Lewis for years now: credit sales are driving the growth. Credit sales were up 15.8% this period vs. cash sales down 11.8%. Credit sales have achieved a CAGR of 16.9% over the past three years, now accounting for 66.2% of total merchandise sales. This has knock-on benefits for other revenue sources like insurance revenue, which is why group revenue growth of 9.8% is well above the increase in merchandise sales.

It’s natural to worry about the credit quality here, with Lewis pointing out that the quality of the book has improved with satisfactory paying customers at an all-time high of 81.3%. Despite this, the impairment provision as a percentage of debtors has increased due to the macroeconomic outlook.

Although operating profit came in 13.1% higher, a substantial jump in net finance costs blunted the benefit by the time we reach the bottom of the income statement. Headline earnings actually fell by 1.9%, with the share buybacks that Lewis is well-known for helping to turn that into a positive result, with HEPS up by 7.1%.

Along with ongoing share buybacks, Lewis also increased the dividend for the year by 21.1% to 500 cents per share.

The trading outlook isn’t appealing, with Lewis expecting conditions to not improve in the short- to medium-term. Despite this, they continue to invest in the store footprint. When the economy is ugly, the biggest groups can afford to keep investing to win market share at the expense of smaller competitors, positioning them strongly for when the cycle turns positive.


Nedbank’s HEPS is being helped greatly by buybacks (JSE: NED)

The first four months of the year reflect modest growth in the underlying business

Nedbank has released a trading update for the four months ended April 2024. With an expectation of interest rate cuts later this year, the bank is going to need to do more to get expense growth in line with revenue growth.

Headline earnings has only grown by mid-single digits for the four months, with Nedbank Wealth and Nedbank African Regions as the laggards. Thanks to share buybacks, HEPS increased by early double digits.

Although they talk about good expense management in the announcement, the reality is that jaws (the difference between income growth and expense growth) is negative and margins have gone the wrong way, even if that is mainly due to lower than expected growth in net interest income (NII) and non-interest revenue (NIR) rather than runaway expenses. They can’t control income to the same extent that they can control expenses.

For the four months, NII growth was just below mid-single digits. There was slight improvement in net interest margin year-on-year, but we are firmly at the top of the interest rate cycle and the likelihood from here onwards is that interest margin comes under pressure as rates start declining. Margin was already lower for these four months than for FY23. I was surprised to see that banking assets only increased by low-to-mid single digits despite the prevalence of inflation. This suggests a cautious approach in the run-up to elections, particularly by South African corporates. Deposit growth was ahead of advances growth, which also talks to caution and companies sitting on their cash.

Impairments decreased year-on-year and so did the credit loss ratio, but it remains above the through-the-cycle target of 60 basis points to 100 basis points due to pressure in the retail and business banking book.

Moving to NIR, growth was above mid-single digits if you adjust for distortions in the base related to Nedbank Zimbabwe and below mid-single digits if you don’t make that adjustment. The insurance business was the disappointment for the period, while areas like deal closures in CIB and cross-sell to main-banked clients were encouraging.

Associate income related to Nedbank’s 21% stake in Ecobank is expected to be 32% lower year-on-year for the first half of the year. This was due to a non-recurring gain in the base period.

Expense growth was above mid-single digits. Variable costs were slower than expected because of the revenue growth pressure. When viewed against income, jaws came out slightly negative and the cost-to-income ratio increased.


Trustco’s NAV per share is well down year-on-year (JSE: TTO)

But it has moved higher over the past six months

Trustco has released its financials for the six months ended February 2024. As this is an investment holding company, the income statement looks different to what you might be used to seeing. It includes fair value gains and losses on investments. It also included a significant gain on debt settlement in this period.

The net asset value per share as at February 2024 was 128 cents, which is down 20.5% year-on-year. It’s worth highlighting that this is an increase from 117.06 cents that was reported as at August 2023, the end of the last financial year.

The fair value moves were a mixed bag for the portfolio. The micro-finance, commercial banking and education portfolios all lost value, attributed to higher interest rates. The insurance portfolio was also down, with market volatility as a further challenge. On the positive side, the real estate and mining portfolios moved in the right direction.

The discount rates used to value the investments range from 18.03% to 28.68%. Unsurprisingly, the highest rate is used in the mining portfolio where the risk is the highest.

There are a few transactions currently underway at Trustco, including accessing up to $100 million in hybrid capital from Riskowitz Value Fund. Trustco has announced the acquisition of a further 11.35% in Legal Shield. Finally, they are aiming to convert NAD 4.4 billion of debt and “equity liabilities” into equity. The regulatory process is being followed in terms of drafting the circulars etc.


Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • Associates of two different directors of a major subsidiary of RFG Holdings (JSE: RFG) sold shares worth nearly R2.9 million.
    • Here’s a strong signal for you: the company secretary of Altron (JSE: AEL) as well a a director of a major subsidiary have bought shares in the company with a total value of R962k.
    • An associate of a director of Workforce Holdings (JSE: WKF) sold R825k worth of shares to a B-BBEE investment group to improve the B-BBEE shareholding of Workforce. The price was R1.65 per share which is above the current market price of R1.40, so it wasn’t exactly a subsidised trade.
    • Although the total value is small, a few executive directors of Hammerson (JSE: HMN) have elected to reinvest their dividends in the company.
  • African Rainbow Minerals (JSE: ARI) has closed the deal to subscribe for a 15% stake in Surge Copper Corp, which is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. The total value is C$3.93 million (around R55 million) and the subscription price was an 18% premium to the 20-day VWAP, which isn’t uncommon in a deal like this. To buy up a stake that size in a small listed company is usually impossible due to liquidity constraints. The share price would run by far more than 18% if a stake this size changed hands on-market. The other nuance of course is that the cash is flowing into the company, not to other shareholders.
  • There are wholesale leadership changes at EOH (JSE: EOH), with Andrew Mthembu stepping down as chairman and interim CEO after he helped fill that role to effect a leadership transition. Marius de la Rey comes in as interim CEO, which is an internal appointment as he is currently the CEO of iOCO South Africa. I don’t know why this is yet another interim appointment, as it sends a message to the market that they don’t back him in the role. There are also three appointments of independent non-executive directors.
  • Rebosis (JSE: REA | JSE: REB) gave an update on the property disposals currently underway as part of the public sales process under the business rescue plan. It looks like pretty much all the disposals have either already gone through or are expected to go through by the end of June.
  • Vunani (JSE: VUN) released a cautionary announcement regarding negotiations to dispose of a minority shareholding in a subsidiary. They don’t give any further details at this stage.
  • Between September 2023 and May 2024, Momentum Metropolitan (JSE: MTM) repurchased 3.06% of shares in issue at an average price of R20.87 per share. That’s slightly below the current traded price. They can repurchase a further 1.94% of issued shares under the current share repurchase authority. As the share price is trading at a discount to embedded value, they point out that R1.53 billion in embedded value was repurchased for R913 million. This is a similar concept to an investment holding company or a property fund trading at a discount to NAV.
  • Southern Palladium (JSE: SDL) announced that 46.7 million shares (over half of total shares in issue) will be released from escrow in June after a 24-month escrow period. This might encourage some liquidity in the share price but could also put downward pressure on it. 45.5 million of those shares were issued to the vendors of a 70% interest in the Bengwenyama PGM project. Of those being released from escrow, 22.75 million shares will be subject to voluntary escrow for up to 24 months or until certain project milestones have been achieved, whichever is earlier. The shares may be clawed back by the company and cancelled for a nominal sum if project milestones aren’t achieved within four years from the date of the ASX listing.
  • The acquisition by Novus (JSE: NVS) of Bytefuse, a small related party deal, has been amended to extend the fulfilment date for suspensive conditions from 31 May 2024 to 30 June 2024.
  • Oando (JSE: OAO) is still playing catch-up with financial results, with a flurry of announcements on Friday that included all the quarterly numbers for 2023.

Olympic fever and other ailments

With the Paris Olympics set to kick off in 55 days, headlines around the world’s biggest sporting event are getting more surreal by the day. From sex-restricting beds in the Olympic Village to a dodgy riverside rendezvous planned on social media, the run-up to the opening ceremony promises to be a doozy. And yet, history has already proven that nothing that happens at the 2024 Olympics will come close to what already happened in 1904.

Amid the blur of election news, I read a headline that stopped me in my tracks earlier this week. “Parisians to ‘take a sh*t’ in Seine ahead of Olympic Games” proclaimed Metro News.

While the headline itself is surprising, the context probably shouldn’t be. Protesting is deeply rooted in the French relationship with their government. As South Africans, this makes sense to us: sometimes, you have to make the government listen to you. From the French Revolution to the numerous strikes and protests seen in modern times, the French have consistently demonstrated a willingness to challenge authority and fight for their rights.

Currently, the object of their ire is the £1.2 billion state-sponsored initiative to clean up the Seine River in Paris. The project aims to prepare the river for various water sports and activities for the Olympics, involving significant efforts to reduce pollution, upgrade sewage treatment facilities and improve the city’s overall water management systems. While one might expect Parisians to welcome this endeavour, they are, in fact, quite furious about it.

So furious that they are organising a “sht flashmob” in the river on the day President Emmanuel Macron and Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo are scheduled to swim in it to demonstrate the success of the cleanup. The hashtag #JeChieDansLaSeineLe23Juin, which translates to “I sht in the Seine on June 23,” started trending on X after Hidalgo announced the date of her swim. Additionally, a website with the same name was launched, allowing participants to share the locations where they plan to defecate.

Charming.

As South Africans, all we can do is set our calendar notifications and watch the headlines to see if they go through with it. While we wait, allow me to remind you that even if the president of France and the mayor of Paris take a dirty dip on the 23rd of June, that still won’t be the wildest story in Olympic history.

That honour belongs to the story of the Men’s Marathon at the 1904 Olympics in North America.

The marathon that almost ended all marathons

Nobody starts off at their job as an expert. Keep this in mind when you think about the team that planned the Men’s Marathon at the first-ever Summer Olympics hosted in the United States, way back in 1904. While they had no experience, these event planners clearly had high aspirations and an irrational sense of optimism in the abilities of human runners.

The marathon took place on the 30th of August. Since no standard for marathons existed yet, the race was an arbitrary distance of 40 km. While most marathon events around the world are usually scheduled as early as possible in the morning, this one started at 15:00 and was run during the hottest part of the day. 32 athletes representing seven nations, including the United States, France, Cuba, Greece, South Africa (in our Olympic debut!), Great Britain and Canada competed, but only 14 managed to complete the race.

So, what went wrong? For starters, the majority of the race took place over country roads that were centimetres deep in dust. There were seven hills, some with brutally long ascents. In many places, cracked stone was strewn across the roadway and runners had to constantly dodge crosstown traffic, delivery wagons, railroad trains, trolley cars and people walking their dogs.

Despite the heat and the dust, there were only two places along the course where athletes could secure fresh water – from a water tower at 9 kilometres and a roadside well at 19 kilometres. This was done on purpose, as James Sullivan, the chief organiser of the games, wanted to minimise fluid intake to test the limits and effects of purposeful dehydration. It sounds like torture (and it probably is), but this was actually a common area of research at the time.

So, how did the athletes fare?

Not great, as you could probably guess.

During the race, John Lordan, who had won the 1903 Boston Marathon, was violently ill after 16 kilometres and retired, while Sam Mellor, who had won the 1902 Boston Marathon, was also overcome by the dust. Despite leading the field at the halfway mark, Mellor became disoriented and ultimately dropped out of the race after 23 kilometres.

The first to arrive at the finish line, after three hours and 13 minutes, was American Frederick Lorz. After being hailed as the winner, he had his photograph taken with Alice Roosevelt, daughter of then-U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. She placed a wreath upon Lorz’s head and was about to award him the gold medal when spectators claimed Lorz had not run the entire race. Lorz, suffering cramps, had actually dropped out of the race after 14 kilometres and hitched a ride back to the stadium in a car, waving at spectators and runners alike during the ride. When the car broke down at the 30th kilometre, he re-entered the race and casually jogged across the finish line.

Thomas Hicks ended up as the winner of the event, although he was aided by various measures that would definitely not have been permitted in later years. 16 kilometres from the finish, Hicks led the race by 2.4 kilometres but had to be restrained from stopping and lying down by his trainers. From then until the end of the race, Hicks received several doses of strychnine – a common rat poison, which stimulates the nervous system in small doses – mixed with brandy and egg white. He continued to battle onwards, hallucinating the entire time, and was barely able to walk for most of the course. When he reached the stadium, his support team carried him over the line, holding him in the air while he shuffled his feet as if still running.

Cuban postman Andarín Carvajal had also joined the marathon, arriving at the last minute. After losing all of his money gambling in New Orleans, he hitchhiked to St. Louis and had to run the event in street clothes, with his trousers cut around the legs to make them into shorts. Not having eaten in 40 hours, he stopped off in an orchard en route to eat some apples, which turned out to be rotten. The rotten apples caused him to have strong stomach cramps, and he had to lie down and take a nap. Despite his discomfort and the pause, Carvajal somehow still managed to finish in fourth place.

The South African entrants, Len Taunyane and Jan Mashiani, finished ninth and twelfth, respectively. This was a disappointment, as many observers were sure Taunyane could have done better if he had not been chased nearly 2 kilometres off course by wild dogs.

A far cry from the sophisticated heritage of the Greek marathon, the marathon at the 1904 Summer Olympics sounds like it was closer in theme to a carnival attraction. Despite public outcry and a threat to ban the event from future Olympics, the marathon endured and has remained a staple of the Olympics since then.

As a staunch feminist I’m surprised to see myself write these words, but thank goodness there wasn’t a women’s event.

About the author: Dominique Olivier

Dominique Olivier is the founder of human.writer, where she uses her love of storytelling and ideation to help brands solve problems.

She is a weekly columnist in Ghost Mail and collaborates with The Finance Ghost on Ghost Mail Weekender, a Sunday publication designed to help you be more interesting.

Dominique can be reached on LinkedIn here.

Ghost Bites (Afine | Anglo – BHP | Capital Appreciation | Delta | Emira | Nampak | Old Mutual | Trustco | Woolworths | Zeda)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:


Afine’s dividend has moved lower (JSE: ANI)

There’s also an awkward restatement of financials

Afine owns a portfolio of forecourts across four South African provinces. Revenue for the year ended February 2024 moved 2.7% higher, which is a pretty pedestrian outcome. Distributable earnings fell 4.3% and the dividend per share is down 6.2%. This specialised REIT isn’t giving investors any growth at the moment.

The net asset value is 12.2% higher at R4.06 and the current share price is R4.00, a rare example of a REIT trading at roughly its NAV. Speaking of the NAV, the fund had to correct a embarrassing issue related to the 28 February 2023 numbers, in which the valuation of one of the properties included an extra year of cash inflow in the discounted cash flow valuation. This led to the fair value adjustment being overstated by R7.2 million. They have now fixed this.

The total dividend per year was 41.10 cents, so the current price offers a yield in excess of 10%.


Anglo says no to BHP – yet again (JSE: AGL | JSE: BHG)

Anglo is stubborn about the proposed structure

In and amongst the election news headlines on the airwaves, Anglo American and BHP Group were playing ping-pong on SENS. Due to the local public holiday yesterday and the resultant catch-up of announcements on SENS before the market opened, it looked weirder than would otherwise have been the case.

It started with Anglo American responding to the news from BHP that it doesn’t intend to make a firm offer for Anglo American. There wasn’t much in that announcement beyond the usual corporate gumph reminding investors that Anglo American has a plan to unlock value.

Things then got more interesting, with BHP talking about a range of socioeconomic measures that have been proposed to address Anglo American’s concerned. They must’ve gotten an advisor on board who suggested some ESG stuff to tug at the heartstrings of Anglo shareholders, particularly after BHP gave South Africa the cold shoulder in the deal structure through not wanting any of the local assets.

These measures include things like local procurement, the establishment of a mining centre of excellence and even maintaining funding for charitable commitments. Investors were probably more interested in BHP being willing to discuss a break fee, payable in the event of the proposed structure failing to meet necessary regulatory approvals.

When you consider that Anglo’s value unlock proposal has a few similar steps to the BHP proposal and comes without the benefit of a buyout offer and break fee if implemented, I’m surprised that BHP didn’t give the break fee more airtime in its announcement.

Still, BHP wasn’t willing to put down a firm intention to make an offer and asked for a further extension of the deadline to do so.

Anglo was having none of it, commenting that the socioeconomic measures don’t address the structural difficulty in BHP’s proposal. It’s still beyond me why the BHP proposal is considered bad because all the execution risk is borne by Anglo, yet the Anglo value unlock proposal is somehow better than this even though the risk is quite obviously born by Anglo shareholders as the only parties in an internal restructuring. On this basis, Anglo believes that there is no need for an extension to the deadline.

This brings us to the final position, for now at least: BHP will not make a firm offer for Anglo American. They are allowed to come back to the table if a third party announces an offer for Anglo, or in other limited circumstances.

Watch this share price carefully, as the takeout premium can quickly wash away if nobody else puts their hand up for Anglo American:


Capital Appreciation had a better second half (JSE: CTA)

The expected credit loss for GovChat has skewed the HEPS move

Capital Appreciation released a trading statement dealing with the year ended March 2024. It reflects an increase in HEPS of between 81% and 84.8%, but be very careful in interpreting that, as the expected credit loss for GovChat was included in HEPS in the base period and was significantly reduced in this period.

Also note that Dariel Group, an acquisition completed in July 2023, was included in this period and not in the base period.

Instead of focusing on the percentage move, we can look at the solid second half of the year that took HEPS from the interim period of 6.5 cents to a full-year result of between 13.47 cents and 13.75 cents. This was driven by increased activity in the Payments division, better expense management and strong cash flows. The Software division is still struggling with delays or deferrals of contracts.

Detailed results are due on 5 June.


Delta Property Fund has seen some improvement (JSE: DLT)

The swing into an operating profit is thanks to reduced expenses, amongst other things

Delta Property Fund is fighting for its survival, having renewed debt facilities with Nedbank out to April 2025. Investec facilities have been renewed until June 2025. The banks are hoping that the fund will find a way out of this mess and to their credit, Delta’s management team is giving it a full go. Operating profit came in at R399.2 million for the year ended February, which is vastly better than a R226.1 million loss in the comparable period.

Asset disposals aren’t easy in this environment, with debt reduced by R74.1 million in the past year from disposals and R109.7 million from dividends. The loan-to-value ratio is down from 59.9% to 59.4%. It’s like trying to dig a hole with a spoon. Since the end of this financial period, further disposals of R144.9 million have been achieved.

Portfolio vacancies have increased from 32.9% to 33.4%, so they are fighting that battle as well.

There are still no guarantees whatsoever that Delta will emerge from this in one piece.


Emira releases numbers, but reporting periods changed (JSE: EMI)

This makes the year-on-year comparisons unhelpful

When a company changes its year-end, the annoyance is that year-on-year comparisons become silly. You can’t compare a 12-month period to a 9-month period, or a 15-month period. In the case of Emira, the year ended March 2024 must be compared to the 9 months ended March 2023, so we find ourselves with this problem.

The percentage movements are therefore not worth focusing on. Instead, we can consider numbers like the total dividend per share of 117.02 cents, which puts the fund on a trailing yield of 12.2%. Tell me again about that residential buy-to-let investment on a net yield of maybe 7% if you’re lucky?

Emira’s loan-to-value ratio is 42.4%, which is better than 44.0% as at March 2023. Balance sheet numbers can be compared regardless of changes in the length of a reporting period, as they represent a snapshot rather than a period of time.

You may recall that Emira is selling a large portfolio to Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) for a total price of R1.146 billion. There are various conditions still to be met for this. Emira will use the proceeds to reduce debt and fund new acquisitions.


Nampak releases the circular for the largest disposals (JSE: NPK)

These deals are part of the plan to fix the balance sheet

Nampak is in the process of a difficult turnaround that has been made particularly tricky by the ongoing challenges with African currencies. To try and address the problems in the group and create a sustainable balance sheet that will be supported by lenders and shareholders alike, there are various disposals underway. They’ve been captured in a circular available here.

The Liquid Cartons disposal entails selling Nampak Liquid Cartons to a consortium of Corvest, Dlondlobala Capital and management. This includes the South African Nampak Liquid Cartons business, as well as Nampak Zambia and Nampak Malawi. The base price is R350 million.

The Bevcan Nigeria disposal is to a new company incorporated in Singapore and owned by the Evergreen Trust. Nampak shareholders will be thrilled to see the back of this business, based on all the life that the Nigerian currency has sucked out of various South African corporates recently. The price is $68.5 million and the deal includes Bevcan Nigeria repaying $10 million to Nampak for historic trade payables.

Ultimately, these deals are part of an asset disposal plan to raise R2.6 billion and create a focused group that has a much better chance of success going forward. It’s still not going to be easy, with this paragraph from the circular laying it out pretty clearly:

While actively pursuing these strategies, it is anticipated that there will nevertheless be sustained low growth in most of the geographies the Group operates in, with significant hard currency liquidity constraints. A serious risk is volume loss, some of which has crystalised already, but the Group is responding with appropriate mitigation actions. The Nampak corporate strategy and transformational plan intends to hurdle all these restraining forces.

I can’t see a world in which shareholders don’t approve of these disposals.


Old Mutual is struggling with cash outflows (JSE: OMU)

Hanging onto assets is tough out there

Old Mutual has released a voluntary update for the quarter ended March. Of course, the headline they focus on is double digit sales growth, which is true for Life APE sales (admittedly only just, with 10% growth). This is definitely the pick of the numbers, so I’m not surprised they focused on it.

Gross flows increased by just 4%, driven in part by an acquisition in Malawi. Still, it’s positive at least. Net client cash flow was ever-so-slightly positive at R166 million, down sharply from R899 million in the prior period despite the increase in gross flows. The culprit is large outflows in the investments and personal finance side of the business, despite growth in wealth management.

Loans and advances increased by 3% (mainly in Africa) and gross written premiums grew 7%


Trustco is profitable, but NAV has moved lower (JSE: TTO)

I can only smile at the reference to the CAGR since 1992

After releasing a trading statement, Trustco closed 48.65% higher and on strong traded volumes, so there are people happy to throw their money at this story. I’m not one of them.

The company references its compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 68.97% since 1992. That would be a lot more impressive if it wasn’t for what this chart looks like:

Nevertheless, for the six months to February 2024, HEPS came in at between 8.63 cents and 13.71 cents. That’s a nice swing from the headline loss per share of -25.38 cents in the comparable period. Despite this, the net asset value per share is down by between 10.27% and 30.27%, coming in at between 112 and 144 cents per share.

The share price even after the rally is 55 cents, so that’s quite a discount to net asset value.

Detailed results are due on 31 May. This is another example of a trading statement being released the day before results.

Separately, the company renewed the cautionary announcement related to Sterling Global Trading becoming a 70% shareholder in Meya Mining.


Woolworths’ apparel business is letting them down (JSE: WHL)

This turnaround story is faltering

After the release of a trading statement dealing with the 53 weeks ending June 2024, Woolworths suffered a share price drop that took the return over the past year into the red. It was a bad day overall for the sector, but there has only been one grocery winner in the past 12 months:

Of course, Woolworths is more than just a grocery business. For a while, this was a good thing, as a recovery in Fashion Beauty and Home was driving much of the support from the market, particularly with Woolworths Food under assault from Checkers.

With a 53-week period and all the David Jones noise in the base, we need to wait until the release of detailed results in September to know for sure what the performance looks like. For now, we know that earnings will be down at least 20%, even at adjusted HEPS level.

The major concern is that the second half of the year is proving to be a further disappointment for the apparel business, with discretionary spending power down in both South Africa and Australia. This is putting margins under pressure, which is exactly what the market doesn’t want to see.

The Food business is described as experiencing market share gains, presumably at the expense of hapless Pick n Pay, although the announcement doesn’t say for sure.

Either way, the momentum in this turnaround is gone. As this five-year chart shows, Woolworths needs to hold the current level or potentially face an ugly journey back towards COVID lows:


Zeda announces its maiden interim dividend (JSE: ZZD)

But my hope for a share price pop after earnings hasn’t transpired

Zeda is one of those locally listed companies that looks cheap regardless of how you cut it. This is why I own the shares. I was hoping for the share price to jump after the release of earnings, but this didn’t happen. I’m happily still holding, though.

For the six months to March, Zeda reported revenue growth of 19% and EBITDA growth of 7.5%. HEPS fell by 12.5% to 165.5 cents. Return on equity was still very lucrative at 28.5%. Earnings may have dipped, but the group felt confident enough about the balance sheet to announce an interim dividend of 50 cents per share.

The share price at R11.90 doesn’t look expensive to me based on these numbers, especially as these are interim profit numbers rather than full-year numbers.

The leasing business grew revenue by 17%, with the operations in the rest of Africa contributing 22% to total revenue. EBITDA margin expanded from 57% to 59% in this business and operating margin was up from 23% to 26%.

The car rental business grew revenue by 19.6% but suffered a decline in profitability as the used car market declined. This drove discounts in the market for cars, which hampers the economics over the life-cycle of a rental vehicle that they need to sell once it gets too old. EBITDA was flat in this business and operating profit moved lower, with other issues including damage to the vehicles based on road infrastructure.

I was expecting a solid jump in revenue in car rentals. The impact on profitability isn’t great news, but I still believe in the story and especially the appeal of the current share price, especially with a dividend underpin.


Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • If you read the Discovery (JSE: DSY) announcement carefully, you’ll see that Adrian Gore sold shares worth R29.4 million. Those NHI jitters must be quite something. He’s also hedged 1,873,770 shares in a put-call option structure, with the put at R94.15 and the call at R151.40. Fellow director Barry Swartzberg has entered into put-call options over a total of 1.7 million shares across two tranches. The put option price is R99.60 per share and the call options are at either R150.11 or R160.77 depending on the tranche.
    • An associate of a director of Glencore (JSE: GLN) acquired shares worth £96.2k. In a separate transaction, two associates of a different director of Glencore acquired shares worth £49k.
    • A director of a major subsidiary of Hulamin (JSE: HLM) received shares under the group’s share plan and then disposed of the whole lot for just over R1 million. Particularly in smaller groups, it’s always better to see executives retain a non-taxable portion. Selling the entire award is a bearish indicator for me.
    • A non-executive director of Hammerson (JSE: HMN) has bought shares worth £9k through a dividend reinvestment plan.
  • Although technically a director dealing, this trade is complicated enough to warrant its own section. An SPV related to the chairman of Metrofile (JSE: MFL) has bought 36 million shares from Sabvest (JSE: SBP) for R108.3 million. Sabvest has given limited funding guarantees to facilitate the transaction and will use the proceeds to reduce debt. The selling price is R3.01 per share. The buyer has also been granted a call option to buy another 21 million shares at the same price, exercisable until November 2025. Finally, the buyer has been granted a put option for 21 million shares at R3.01 that can be exercised either in November 2025 or May 2026. The current share price of Metrofile is R2.55. I can see why Sabvest offloaded at R3.01, even if there are strings attached that might come into play down the line.
  • Italtile (JSE: ITE) announced the appointment of Brandon Wood (currently CFO) as COO and the appointment of Lamar Booysen as CFO as an internal promotion. This speaks to a solid succession plan within the group.
  • Acsion (JSE: ACS) announced that the finalisation of results for the year ended February 2024 has been delayed. They expect to release them by 14 June.
  • Salungano (JSE: SLG) announced that KPMG has resigned as external auditor of the company without giving any reason. That’s exactly the kind of look that you don’t want to have as a corporate.
  • Capitec (JSE: CPI) announced that S&P has raised Capitec Bank’s standalone credit profile from bb to bb+. Although this may not have a direct implication for equity holders, the rationale for the upgrade was around the business banking operations and Capitec’s diversification, which gives support to the reasons why investors have been buying into the story.

Shifting gear: SA’s electric vehicle transition

Listen to the podcast here:


This year, South Africa is set to become the tenth-largest solar market in the world. In 2023 R17.5 billion rands of solar panels were imported into this country. In episode 4 of The Current we explore SA’s apparent solar boom. With loadshedding on the decrease does it still make commercial sense to install solar for your business or home? Listen to Iman Rappetti in conversation with Investec’s Melanie Humphries, Bernard Geldenhuys and De Wet Taljaard from the South African Photovoltaic Industry Association (SAPVIA).


Also on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and YouTube:

Ghost Bites (African Media Entertainment | AYO Technology | Pepkor | Reinet | Spear REIT | Vukile – Capital & Regional – Growthpoint)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:


Things look better at African Media Entertainment (JSE: AME)

Video streaming hasn’t killed the radio star

Radio still has a role to play in South Africa. I firmly believe this. We are a nation of people who spend a lot of time commuting, often in cars and taxis where the radio can be played. This is great for advertisers looking to get out of the social media noise and reach people in a different way.

The numbers at African Media Entertainment support this thesis, with the company releasing a trading statement noting an increase of between 53% and 67% in HEPS for the year ended March 2024. I suspect that the return of live events were a major part of this, as radio does benefit tremendously from people being able to get out there and have fun.

Results are expected this week, so we will then have full details.

As you’ll read below in my AYO update, it’s disappointing when companies release a trading statement so close to results coming out. They need to do better in their financial reporting.


Losses are lower at AYO Technology – but it’s still a loss (JSE: AYO)

Detailed results are due this week

Ahead of the release of results on 30th May, someone at AYO woke up and realised that they need to release a trading statement before results come out. I always think that you can tell a lot about a company by the gap between the trading statement and the release of results.

Directors are supposed to release a trading statement as soon as they become reasonably certain that earnings will differ by more than 20% from the prior period. Does that certainty really only happen two days before the release of results?

The headline loss per share for the six months to February 2024 is expected to be between -25.21 cents and -41.04 cents, which is a significant improvement vs. the headline loss per share of -79.13 cents for the comparable period.

It’s still a loss, though, and a large one at that – the share price is only R0.38!


Pepkor is giving plenty of credit where credit is due (JSE: PPH)

Sales are being boosted significantly by the credit strategy

Pepkor has released results for the six months to March. The highlights reel is that revenue has grown 9.5%, gross profit has improved by 200 basis points to 38.1% and operating profit increased 13.0% on a normalised basis.

HEPS increased by 7.8% on a normalised basis, so these are decent numbers.

The normalisation in question relates to a non-recurring gain under IFRS 16 in the comparable period. I’m comfortable with that being ignored for the purposes of understanding the genuine underlying performance in this period. Without that adjustment, HEPS would be down 3.1%, which is a silly way to frame this performance.

The group has taken significant steps forward in the FinTech business, with Flash enjoying a 28% increase in throughput value over the period, with a network of 165,000 traders. Abacus nearly doubled written policies to 650,000. Overall, FinTech revenue increased by 24.5% and now contributes 13% of group revenue. Conversely, group merchandise sales were up 7.0% and like-for-like sales were up 5.1%.

The bulk of revenue (73%) still comes from the clothing and general merchandise segment, with growth of 8.0%. The furniture, appliances and electronics segment is having a tougher time of things, with growth of only 4.5% and a contribution of 14% of group revenue.

The “credit interoperability” strategy in the group is doing wonders for credit sales, which increased 34.0% to contribute 13% to group revenue. Group cash sales were only up by 3.8%. R3.1 billion was invested by the group in credit books. PEP’s sales mix is now 7% credit sales vs. just 3% in the comparable period, so this is a powerful trend.

The gross margin increase of 200 basis points to 38.1% was driven by lower markdown activity, better shipping rates and continued improvement at Ackermans. There’s still a long way to go at Ackermans, with like-for-like growth of 2.5% being the lowest level in the group. Even JD Group managed to do better than that, with like-for-like growth of 3.9%.

Avenida in Brazil continues to show great promise, with like-for-like growth of 9.3% and total sales growth of 23.4%, both on a constant currency basis. PEP Africa is doing even better than that, up 24.7% on a like-for-like basis and 22.8% overall.


Reinet’s net asset value increased 8.1% in the past year (JSE: RNI)

Pension Insurance Corporation is doing the heavy lifting here

Reinet shareholders will be pleased to learn that the net asset value as at 31 March 2024 is €34.02, up 8.1% from €31.46 a year ago. Of course, the rand movement over that time also plays a role in the returns for South Africans. After all, Reinet is designed as a “stay-rich” global investment portfolio.

Dividends of €130 million were received from British American Tobacco and an inaugural dividend of €57 million was received from Pension Insurance Corporation. Capital invested during the year was €128 million, mainly into funds managed by partners.

The pressure over the period was the decline in the British American Tobacco share price. I maintain my view that British American Tobacco is going to end up being a disappointment for shareholders. It might pay dividends, but I expect the share price to be pedestrian over time, leading to a total return that isn’t exciting.

The investments in funds managed by the liked of TruArc do have higher growth prospects, so perhaps that will help offset some of the challenges in returns from British American Tobacco. For now at least, Pension Insurance Corporation is the highlight for Reinet shareholders.

The net asset value attributable to British American Tobacco is €1.35 billion. Pension Insurance Corporation is much larger at €3.4 billion. The private equity and related partnerships net asset value is up to €1.2 billion, so growth there is very capable of making up for British American Tobacco.

The dividend to be paid by Reinet is up 16.7% year-on-year, which is excellent growth especially in euros.


Spear closes the disposal of the Liberty Life building (JSE: SEA)

This does wonders for the loan-to-value ratio

Back in February 2023, Spear announced a deal with Capitec Bank for the disposal of the Liberty Life building near Century City as a going concern for R400 million. The deal was finally implemented on 28 May 2024, with Spear receiving the disposal consideration accordingly. It can take a while to conclude deals of this size.

Of the proceeds, R235 million was used to settle the debt and R165 million will be retained in cash. This will be used for the planned acquisition of the Emira Western Cape portfolio that was announced in April 2024.

The loan-to-value ratio has been reduced by 650 basis points to 24.50%.


Vukile won’t bid for Growthpoint subsidiary Capital & Regional (JSE: VKE | JSE: GRT | JSE: CRP)

Vukile couldn’t reach agreement with Growthpoint on what the deal would need to look like

This is a classic example of a deal that has fizzled out, reminding the market that betting on the outcome of M&A activity is one of the riskiest games you can play.

After the news broke that Vukile was considering a bid for Capital & Regional, the market got excited about what that might look like. There was further news that Growthpoint (which holds 68.1% of Capital & Regional) had received interest from a potential competing bidder.

Bidding wars rarely deliver a good outcome for the buyer, so kudos to Vukile for being disciplined here. After unsuccessful discussions with Growthpoint and no agreement on what the terms and structure of a possible offer would need to look like to be acceptable to Growthpoint, Vukile has opted to walk away. There are some circumstances under which Vukile would be able to return to the table within the next six months, but for now they are off the table.


Little Bites:

  • South32 (JSE: S32) announced that the sale of Illawarra Metallurgical Coal is still on track to be completed in the first half of the 2025 financial year, with the latest update being that BlueScope Steel has waived its pre-emptive right. There are various other conditions that still need to be met, including major regulators.
  • Putprop (JSE: PPR) will go ahead with the odd-lot offer announced in April 2024, as shareholder approval has now been obtained. The price is a 5% premium to the 30-day VWAP that will be calculated based on 3 June. Don’t get too excited here, as even a good guess based on what that price might be won’t be rewarding. At a share price of R3.19 based on Tuesday’s close, there’s no opportunity here to make an arbitrage profit on a basket of 100 shares.
  • Brett Clark is retiring from Mpact Limited (JSE: MPT) at the end of May, having joined the group in 2012 and served as CFO. Hannes Snyman replaces him as an internal appointment, having been there since 2014.
  • Huge Group (JSE: HUG) announced the appointment of Tamryn van Tonder as Chief Commercial Officer. She certainly has an impressive CV, which Huge took the opportunity to splash all over SENS.
  • Trustco (JSE: TTO) reminded shareholders that there are various announced and potential transactions underway. For this reason, the cautionary announcement has been renewed.
  • Globe Trade Centre (JSE: GTC) has just about no liquidity, so I’m not giving much attention to first quarter results. For the three months, revenues were up 7% and FFO increased from €16m to €19m. Net loan-to-value adjusted for cash on escrow comes in at 47%.
  • Conduit Capital (JSE: CND) is still trying to complete the disposal of CRIH and CLL. The Prudential Authority still hasn’t given approval for the deal, so the parties have agreed to extend the date for fulfilment of the conditions to 30 June 2024. The JSE, however, has run out of patience. The circular needs to be finalised and distributed as soon as possible despite results having not been published for the years ended June 2022 and June 2023.
  • Numeral (JSE: XII) (previously Go Life International) is going to be late with its financials for the year ended February 2024 as the auditors have requested additional time for the audit. The Stock Exchange of Mauritius (the primary regulator for this listing) has given an extension until the end of June.
  • PSV Holdings (JSE: PSV) has renewed the cautionary announcement related to the proposed recapitalisation of the company and engagements with the provisional liquidator. The shares are suspended from trading anyway.
  • The shareholder in zombie company Afristrat (JSE: ATI) who submitted an application for leave to appeal the judgement regarding a liquidation application has seen that application dismissed with costs. Either way it seems that Afristrat is going to die off through a legal process. The fight is around exactly which legal process.
Verified by MonsterInsights