Thursday, November 13, 2025
Home Blog Page 60

GHOST BITES (AVI | Bidcorp | Mantengu Mining | Metair | MultiChoice | Powerfleet | Premier | Quantum | Santam)

0

AVI flags difficult trading conditions (JSE: AVI)

Consumers still aren’t out of the woods

As we hope for a strong peak season for retailers in South Africa, AVI has given a sobering update on sales for the four months to October. Interest rates and other issues like unemployment remain a problem despite all the GNU excitement.

For the four months, revenue was 3.4% higher year-on-year. That suggests little or no growth in volumes, with the group focusing instead on gross profit margin and other initiatives to extract as much value as possible from the difficult sales environment. This is something that AVI is particularly good at.

I&J remains under pressure from low fishing catch rates. The abalone business is also being impacted by lower prices in Asian markets.

There’s all to play for as we head into December.


Bidcorp impacted by the strong rand (JSE: BID)

The underlying business remains solid

Bidcorp is one of the best rand hedges on the JSE, boasting an exceptional international business. When the rand strengthens, this impacts the translation of the international earnings into rands. Thankfully for Bidcorp shareholders, the rand doesn’t strengthen very often.

For the four months to October, the constant currency results at Bidcorp show 10% growth in trading profit, which is solid. Constant currency HEPS is up 8%, a particularly strong result in a period when inflation has been only 2% for the group. They reckon the stronger rand has had a negative impact of 300 basis points on the numbers, so HEPS as reported would be more like 5% growth.

This growth has been achieved at a time when consumers are still quite weak, with retailers enjoying a period in which consumers are eating more at home and less at restaurants. Bidcorp is focused on the restaurant and hospitality sector, so that makes things harder for them.

Despite major weather and other disruptions, Europe (up 10% constant currency) and the UK (up 8% on the same basis) were the main winners. Emerging markets grew 5%, with South Africa noted as a performance highlight – perhaps a surprising outcome given some of the other comments around consumers by South African companies. Australasia grew revenue by only 3%.

Margins are a concern, as inflationary pressures on costs exceed the underlying inflation in food i.e. the basis on which Bidcorp can increase prices. EBITDA margin is slightly higher year-on-year, driven by better gross profit margin that more than offset the operating cost pressure.

And of course, Bidcorp is never far from a bolt-on acquisition. They’ve already completed three this year with an aggregate value of R1.2 billion.

This remains an exceptional business.


Mantengu Mining swings into the green (JSE: MTU)

The ramp-up in production shows what’s possible

Mantengu Mining has released results for the six months to August. The year-on-year moves will make you dizzy, with revenue up from R13.1 million to R115.9 million as production was ramped up. Gross profit jumped from R1.5 million to R53 million and as you can imagine, this did wonderful things for profitability. HEPS came in at 2 cents per share vs. a loss of 10 cents per share in the prior period.

Notably, there’s still no dividend here as the company is in an expansionary capex phase. They are also busy with acquisitions, like Blue Ridge Platinum and Sublime Technologies, while looking for other opportunities in the mining, mining services and energy sectors.

Although the balance sheet is extremely light on cash as at the reporting date, they have access to various funding lines including a share subscription facility agreement with GEM Global Yield.

And yes, I’m still scratching my head about the $100k acquisition price for Sublime Technologies despite the financials of that business. It makes absolutely no sense to me.


Metair is closer to breathing a sigh of relief (JSE: MTA)

Turkish competition approval is out of the way

Metair is in the process of disposing of its business in Turkey. If you’ve been following the company’s fortunes, you’ll know that this disposal is absolutely critical in their lives.

Thankfully, the Turkish Competition Board has confirmed that its consent is not needed for the deal, so that’s essentially a deemed approval for legal purposes.

This means the remaining condition relates to a financing agreement. If that can be achieved, Metair will unlock capital to fix its balance sheet that has suffered terribly from recent performance.


MultiChoice is losing subscribers at a rapid rate (JSE: MCG)

I’m really not sure how this ends if the Canal+ deal doesn’t go through

MultiChoice has released results for the six months to September. Having suffered through an unwatchable feed of the Springboks game on my DStv Stream TV app, I’m afraid that my sympathy is low. They lost a spectacular 1.8 million subscribers in the past year, or 11% of their base.

They lost 5% of their subscribers in South Africa and 15% in the Rest of Africa. Considering the sheer amount of money that Rest of Africa has swallowed up, it’s particularly worrying that they are losing subscribers at such a rate there. If there’s any silver lining, it’s that Showmax grew 30% year-on-year.

Despite shedding subscribers at this pace, revenue was up 4% excluding forex and M&A impacts. Revenue was down 10% on a reported basis, with forex pressures playing an important role here. You can’t ignore the forex issues here, so focus on the reported numbers without forex adjustments, like the 46% decline in trading profit.

The cash cows in the group (South Africa and Irdeto) generated cash flow of R3.3 billion. The group invested R1.8 billion into Showmax and experienced a R0.9 billion outflow in the rest of Africa.

MultiChoice now has a negative equity position of R2.7 billion. They generated adjusted core headline earnings of just R7 million (yes, with an “m” not a “b”) for this period.

At this point in time, I struggle to see any positive outcomes unless the Canal+ deal goes through. Engagements with regulatory authorities are underway.


Powerfleet is growing faster in the lower margin side of the business (JSE: PWR)

But major cost savings more than made up for it

Powerfleet (which acquired MiX Telematics) has released results for the first half of the 2025 financial year. This means there are two quarters worth of results that include the MiX numbers.

The year-on-year stuff is therefore not hugely useful, but I will highlight that product revenue was up 13% and service revenue was just 5% higher. Considering that product revenue adjusted gross margin is 35% vs. 63.7% in services, investors will want to see those growth rates swap around over time.

The group has already realised $13.5 million in annual cost synergies from the MiX deal, so they are halfway to the two-year target. This led to adjusted operating expenses decreasing by 5%. In turn, this drove a 41% increase in adjusted EBITDA.

The MiX deal is actually old news for the company, with the focus now on the Fleet Complete acquisition and generating growth from the acquired relationships as soon as possible.


Premier turns modest revenue growth into juicy profits (JSE: PMR)

This is the shape you want to see on an income statement

For the six months to September, revenue at Premier Group only increased by 3.7%. That’s not exciting at all, yet HEPS grew by 32.4%! How does a shape like this happen?

It all comes down to operating leverage, which talks to the extent of fixed costs in the cost base. Even small increases in revenue can lead to large increases in profits when there are many fixed costs. Notably, a decrease in revenue therefore also drives a much larger drop in profits, so these business models can be volatile.

When they work, they work really well though. At Millbake for example, revenue was up 2.6% and EBITDA was up 15.8%. This was strong enough to improve group EBITDA by 100 basis points to 11.9%, despite the International business seeing EBITDA decline 2.1% even though revenue was up 9.7%.

Thanks to repayments on debt, the EBITDA increase translated into an even better HEPS increase because net finance costs were down 18.2%. Remember, finance costs are shown below EBITDA, which stands for Earning Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation.

Cash generated from operations increased by 13.5%, exactly in line with EBITDA growth. This talks to strong cash quality of earnings.

The group intends to declare a dividend when full-year results are released in June 2025.


A Quantum leap in earnings (JSE: QFH)

A further trading statement has tightened the range

Quantum Foods has released a further trading statement for the year ended September. Things are way better in the poultry industry, as evidenced by these numbers.

They expect to swing from a headline loss of 17.4 cents to HEPS of between 78.7 cents and 82.1 cents. Detailed results are expected to be released on 29 November.


It sounds like things are good at Santam (JSE: SNT)

There’s decent growth and underwriting results within target range

Santam has released an operational update for the nine months to September 2024. The important point to highlight is that underwriting results were within the 5% to 10% target range, despite all the competition in this space and the usual major weather events.

The conventional insurance business achieved net earned premium growth of 8%. Due to underlying performance in the various insurance lines, the impact of R960 million (net of reinsurance) from weather-related and other significant losses was offset.

Another important point to highlight is that the investment return on the group’s capital portfolios were ahead of expectations. These returns are an important component of overall returns to shareholders in insurance companies.

With much progress having been made on the risks in the property book, Santam is painting a bullish picture.


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • An associate of PJ Mouton bought shares in Curro (JSE: COH) worth R20.1 million.
    • A director of Mondi (JSE: MNP) bought shares in the company worth £118k.
  • MTN (JSE: MTN) and MTN Zakhele Futhi (JSE: MTNZF) announced that all conditions for the extension of the MTN Zakhele Futhi scheme have been fulfilled. The scheme will now mature on 23 November 2027, giving the MTN share price time to (hopefully) improve.
  • Hot on the heels of a capital markets day for debt investors, Discovery (JSE: DSY) appears to have hosted a day for institutional equity investors as well. The entire presentation (all 177 pages of it) is available here. And no, I don’t think you earn any Vitality points for reading it.
  • Just when you thought things couldn’t possibly get any spicier at Trustco (JSE: TTO), the company has decided to upgrade its American Depositary Receipts program to a full Nasdaq listing. This is the same company that had plenty to say about how painful the JSE regulations are. The US is even stricter and vastly more expensive in terms of professional fees like lawyers. Trustco plans to move its primary listing to the Nasdaq, so they will be fully regulated by US requirements – including quarterly reporting etc. Interesting.
  • Sable Exploration and Mining (JSE: SXM) released a trading statement dealing with the period ended August. They expect a headline loss per share of between 8 and 9.7 cents, which is much better than the comparable headline loss per share of 72.65 cents.
  • Zeder (JSE: ZED) recently announced a 20 cents per share special dividend. In an early update during the day, they noted that approval by the SARB had not yet been obtained. Later in the day, they got the approval, so the payment date for the dividend is 25 November.
  • In case you are a shareholder in Visual International (JSE: VIS), be aware that the circular convening the general meeting for the specific issue of shares for cash has been sent out.

GHOST BITES (Boxer | Harmony | Life Healthcare | Omnia | Raubex | Stor-Age | Sibanye | Vodacom | Woolworths)

0

Boxer’s pre-listing statement has been released by Pick n Pay (JSE: PIK)

22 years of turnover growth have brought Boxer to this point

Boxer is without a doubt in the jewel in Pick n Pay’s broken crown. In the latest interim period, it grew turnover 12.0% or 7.7% is on a like-for-like basis. The two-year store roll-out compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is 14%, so they are expanding at pace. It’s the right time to get the market excited about the story and willing to pay up for it, injecting some desperately needed capital into the Pick n Pay balance sheet.

The first few weeks of the new financial period have seen 5.2% like-for-like growth at Boxer, admittedly against a very strong base.

Boxer appears to have a huge growth runway ahead of it, with 4.2% market share of the formal grocery market. You do need to be careful though, as the group makes no effort to win market share in higher income brackets. They have 68% of the discount grocery retail market, which is substantial. Thankfully, as more South Africans move from informal retail into formal retail, their market is growing. Based on expansion into areas where there is currently no Boxer Superstore, they reckon they have the potential to triple current revenue levels over the long term.

Despite the obvious expansion potential, they intend to pay 40% of headline earnings as a dividend.

The offer price range for the listing is R42 to R54 per share. If they get a price at the mid-point, there will be 477 million shares in issue, suggesting a market cap of R22.9 billion. Boxer generated headline earnings of R1.4 billion for the year ended February 2024. That’s an outdated number of course, but it implies a mid-teens Price/Earnings multiple for the group at the mid-point.

I suspect there will be a bit of a feeding frenzy over these shares, with institutions getting in at a juicy price and the share price popping to over 20x P/E when it starts trading. Let’s wait and see.


Harmony’s results look strong, but production was flat (JSE: HAR)

The gold price is doing the heavy lifting here

The gold sector is having a fabulous time at the moment. In Harmony’s latest quarterly results, they show a 21% increase in the average gold price received and a 23% increase in gold revenue. This more than makes up for a 14% increase in all-in sustaining costs, driving operating cash flow 60% higher! Lovely.

Production was only flat year-on-year though, so that’s the obvious area where things could’ve been better. The South Africa underground high-grade operations saw production up 15% thanks to Mponeng. The South African underground operations saw production dip 10%, so that’s where the difficulties were experienced. Production was steady at the South African surface operations and down 11% in the international business.

Although uranium is still a small part of the overall story, it’s a useful by-product of the gold extraction process at Moab Khotsong. Uranium production decreased by 10%, but the price was up 39%. Uranium revenue was R199 million for the quarter.

Mines constantly have to invest to keep their operations ticking over. Capex was up 17% in this period, which looks fine in the context of such strong operating cash growth.


Life gets a huge boost from LMI (JSE: LHC)

The hospital business is delivering the usual single-digit growth

Life Healthcare has released a further trading statement dealing with the year ended September. There’s a jump in HEPS from continuing operations of between 55.9% and 60.9%, which certainly isn’t the stuff we are used to seeing from a hospital group.

As expected, a further read shows that there’s a major once-off boost here: income of $36 million from the sub-licensing arrangement of one of Life Molecular Imaging’s (LMI) early-stage novel radiotherapeutic and radio diagnostic products. That’s legitimate and exciting income, but certainly not an indication of the kind of growth rates that can be maintained.

The dose of realism is that paid patient days grew 1.6% in the acute hospital business and fell 2.6% in the complementary business. Overall volume growth was thus 1.2%, with a boost in revenue per paid patient day taking the southern Africa revenue up by between 7.5% and 7.9%. That’s pretty good actually, although dwarfed by LMI with revenue growth of 180%.

Another important point is that the repayment of international debt (thanks to the sale of Alliance Medical Group) brought interest costs down by 66%. This is why HEPS from continuing and discontinued operations looks even better, up by between 69.4% and 77.3%.


Margins up at Omnia, but not much HEPS excitement (JSE: OMN)

And the issue is on the tax line, not the finance costs line

When you see a company with decent operating profit growth but a disappointing HEPS outcome, it’s usually because finance costs have gone up and the bankers are getting the uptick in performance. Not so at Omnia, where a dispute with the Zimbabwean Revenue Authority means that an operating profit increase of 17% has translated into HEPS growth of just 2%!

This isn’t Omnia’s first tax rodeo, either. They are still sorting out a dispute with SARS going back to the 2014 to 2016 tax years.

Tax weirdness aside, investors can at least feel good about operating margins expanding from 6.5% to 7.3%. Group working capital was down slightly despite the growth in revenue, so they are also managing the business efficiently from a cash perspective.

The Agriculture segment saw revenue dip by 4%, but operating profit increase by 27% thanks to commodity prices and operational improvements over the period. In Mining, revenue was up 15% and operating profit 18%, so that’s a good story from top to bottom. Chemicals, sadly, is a completely different situation – although revenue was up 6%, there was an operating loss of R23 million after an operating profit of R5 million in the prior period. I don’t understand enough about the chemicals market, but it has severely hurt Sasol and the same seems to be happening at Omnia.

The share price is up just 2% year-to-date, reflecting the subdued movement in HEPS.


Raubex posts a banging set of numbers (JSE: RBX)

They are the clear winners in the construction sector

Raubex is a wonderful example of the power of stock picking. At a time when the narrative in most of the construction sector is subdued, this company has delivered spectacular returns in the past year. The best part is that the earnings are backing up the share price growth, so this isn’t just a case of improved sentiment.

For the six months to August, Raubex grew revenue by 29.7% and operating profit by 34.7%. Not only is that excellent growth, but also an improvement in margins. It gets better as you move down the income statement, with HEPS up 49.8%.

The cash story may well be the biggest highlight of all, with cash from operations up 111.5%! This means they had no problem increasing the interim dividend by 49%, in line with HEPS.

If there’s anything to put even the tiniest blemish on these numbers, it’s that the order book reduced from R25.55 billion to R24.50 billion. Management sounds bullish on increases to the order book going forward, with a robust pipeline particularly in South Africa.

If we look deeper at the segmental numbers, things predictably get a lot more volatile. For examples, Materials Handing and Mining saw operating profit margin drop sharply from 10.9% to 8.4%. Revenue was up 39.1% in that division, so they still ended up in the green. Construction Materials grew revenue by 18% and saw operating profit nearly double, with operating profit margin up from 5.1% to 8.5%. Roads and Earthworks also had a great story to tell, with revenue up 31.2% and operating profit margin up from 5.6% to 7.4%, leading to an increase in operating profit of 74%. The Infrastructure business grew revenue by 26.9%, but margin decreased from 7.9% to 7.3% and so operating profit was “only” 15.9% higher. Finally, the International division saw strong results across Rest of Africa (operating profit up 51.4%) and Australia (operating profit up 13.9%).

Overall, it’s hard to fault this set of numbers.


A lower dividend at Stor-Age (JSE: SSS)

At least the net asset value per share is up

If memory serves, Stor-Age warned previously that the dividend payout ratio would be decreasing. This allows the company to retain some of its earnings to fund further growth, a major challenge faced by REITs who are effectively cash conduits for shareholders. Most REITs don’t pay out 100% of their distributable income per share as a dividend, so Stor-Age is simply aligning with the rest of the sector here.

Still, it means that the interim dividend is down 6.8% despite distributable income per share being up 3.5%. The payout ratio is now 90%.

Dividend aside, the underlying metrics look strong. Rental income increased by 10.8% in South Africa and 6.8% in the UK for this interim period, whilst net property operating income was up 12.0% in South Africa and 87.4% in the UK.

The net investment property value increased by 5.4%. The balance sheet is healthy, with a loan-to-value of 31.3%. All this has contributed to 8.3% growth in the net asset value per share.

Still, if you combine the net asset value per share growth with the decrease in the dividend, the total return to shareholders is minimal. Despite this, the share price is up 27% in the past 12 months. Keep an eye on this one, which has been a market darling and is thus ripe for a wobbly.

The net asset value per share is R16.8554 and the share price closed at 1.7% higher on the day of results at R15.21.


Sibanye-Stillwater locks in a gold wage agreement (JSE: SSW)

This is of critical importance with such favourable gold prices

With the ongoing pain in the PGM side of the business, the gold operations are the best part of Sibanye-Stillwater. It’s therefore beyond critical that there are no labour disruptions, as that would truly be a disaster for the group.

It’s good news that Sibanye has concluded wage negotiations in the SA gold operations, effective July 2024 to June 2025. Although this only gives certainty until the middle of next year, it’s a step in the right direction. The wage increase is 5.5%, so that feels fair for all involved.


Vodacom reminds me once more why I don’t like the telecoms sector (JSE: VOD)

The interim dividend is down 6.6%

Vodacom’s revenue increased by just 1% for the six months to September 2024, with substantial forex headwinds as a problem. Much like sector peer MTN, Vodacom has gone looking for growth in Africa and has found consistently depreciating currencies.

Although they try hard to push the constant currency growth story, also known as the “pretend we aren’t in these risky markets and just imagine the possibilities” approach, we know better from MTN experience. You can’t ignore these risks, hence I completely ignore the normalised growth.

HEPS fell by 19.4% and the dividend is down 6.6%, so they’ve increased the payout ratio in an effort to stem the bleeding for shareholders. Operating cash flow fell 18.3% and free cash flow came in at negative R1 billion thanks to the extent of capital expenditure.

Will things work out well with the business in Egypt? It grew by 44.1% in local currency, which is encouraging. It just doesn’t help if these currencies keep falling off a cliff.

This is a really tough sector, with minimal growth opportunities in South Africa (Vodacom didn’t even get approval for its fibre deal with Remgro) and many risks beyond our borders.


Some positive momentum at Woolworths (JSE: WHL)

Australia is still a mess, but the rest is looking better

Woolworths has released a trading update for the 18 weeks ended 3 November. At group level, an increase in turnover of 6.5% really isn’t bad, especially when you start digging deeper.

Woolworths Food managed growth of 9.6% excluding Absolute Pets. With that acquisition included, sales growth was 12.1%, but that’s not a very useful metric. Instead, it’s better to consider price inflation for the period of 6.2%, with trading space (excluding Absolute Pets) up 2% as the group invested in expansion once more. Online sales were up 36.9%, driven by Woolies Dash which grew 54.4%.

Food isn’t where the problems have been recently. The battered and bruised Fashion Beauty and Home (FBH) business seems to be improving, with sales up 3.5% overall. This does however include the winter clearance sale, so be careful of extrapolating this for the entire interim period. Still, it’s a green result despite price movement of just 1.9%, so volumes were positive. Beauty was a highlight, up 20.6% as Woolworths invests in that category. Online sales increased by 36.5%.

The Woolworths Financial Services book was down 3.5% year-on-year and the annualised impairment rate was better at 5.9% vs. 7.5% in the prior period.

This brings us neatly to the end of the good news. Australia remains a huge problem, with Country Road Group suffering a sales decline of 8.8% overall and 13.8% on a comparable store basis. Trading space decreased by 1.6%. They’ve flagged that operating margins have also gone the wrong way, so brace yourself for ugly numbers from that part of the world.


Nibbles:

  • TeleMasters (JSE: TLM) renewed its cautionary announcement regarding a potential offer from B-BBEE investors. The potential acquirer is in the process of securing funding and nothing is guaranteed yet, so for now they are still under cautionary.
  • Acsion (JSE: ACS) released a related party announcement that is a good reminder of just how odd the place is. Firstly, one of their subsidiaries is Hey Joe, a restaurant and brewery in Franschhoek – not the kind of asset you’ll usually find in a listed company. Then, said brewing company has appointed K Anastasi Projects (which happens to be owned by the CEO of Acsion) to construct 69 hotel units on the property. The contract is worth R87.5 million and is thus a small related party transaction under JSE rules. This requires a fairness opinion from an independent expert. Merchantec Capital has opined that the contract is fair, so no further approvals are necessary for the contract.
  • Trustco (JSE: TTO) has announced a general progress update on its corporate transactions. There are a bunch of underlying transactions that are being dealt with in one circular, the drafting of which will start when they publish 2024 financial statements. The Legal Shield deal circular is in progress at the JSE and is going in for its third submission soon (circulars go through several reviews). The resources transaction is also in process at the JSE, with the Preliminary Economic Assessment with the readers panel for review. There’s a lot going on at Trustco and they are doing a decent job here of keeping shareholders in the loop.

UNLOCK THE STOCK: Calgro M3

Unlock the Stock is a platform designed to let retail investors experience life as a sell-side analyst. Corporate management teams give a presentation and then we open the floor to an interactive Q&A session, facilitated by the hosts.

We are grateful to the South African team from Lumi Global, who look after the webinar technology for us.

In the 45th edition of Unlock the Stock, Calgro M3 returned to the platform to talk about the performance and prospects – and of course, for the outgoing management team to explain where they are going and why. The Finance Ghost co-hosted this event with Mark Tobin of Coffee Microcaps and the team from Keyter Rech Investor Solutions.

Watch the recording here:

GHOST BITES (Grindrod | Huge | ISA | Richemont | Sephaku | The Foschini Group)

0

Grindrod’s Mozambican headache is over – for now (JSE: GND)

That was quick, wasn’t it?

Grindrod’s port and terminal operations in Mozambique have been an important part of the recent story. Due to post-election violence in the country, they announced on Thursday that operations had been suspended. A day later, the suspension had been lifted.

Despite the incredibly quick resolution, the market didn’t jump back into Grindrod. It’s down 4% in the past week. Perhaps there’s still some nervousness around potential further issues. Either way, for those who enjoy a speculative punt, this chart is interesting:


Huge Group’s net asset value is higher (JSE: HUG)

Nothing is as huge as the discount to NAV, though

Huge Group accounts for its group as an investment holding company. Given the vast discounts to net asset value (NAV) at which these structures trade on the JSE, that was a decision that I doubt they will look back on with much joy. Sure enough, the NAV has moved up to R9.84 and the share price is stuck at R2.00.

When you see this, the very first thing you should assume is that the market is right until proven otherwise. The directors are incentivised to value the assets as optimistically as possible. The market is incentivised to be more cautious. I use the latter as a safer point of departure.

I guess it also helps that I’ve looked at Huge before, so I know that they value R490 million worth of preference shares at an hilarious required rate of return of 10.75%. That’s a spread of just 138 basis points over where 10-year government bonds are trading right now. It’s little wonder that the market isn’t interested at that price, particularly when the total investment portfolio is valued at just under R1.6 billion. These prefs are therefore a material part of the story, with Huge trying to justify the valuation based on contractual cash flows in the prefs. Those cash flows are only as good as the underlying business paying them, which I somehow doubt is less risky than e.g. South Africa’s biggest banks, which have a significantly higher cost of equity than 10.75%.

As for the rest of the group, discount rates don’t look too unreasonable actually. The group’s track record just gets in the way, as the market doesn’t look very favourably upon Huge. Despite being a South African focused business, the share price has returned exactly nothing this year at a time when the rest of the market has rallied strongly.

Again, the market is telling you something here.


ISA Holdings reports better profits despite a dip in sales (JSE: ISA)

Margin mix is important here

ISA Holdings is an interesting technology company that has delivered a share price return of 60% this year. The improved sentiment around South African stocks has certainly helped here.

For the six months to August, the group managed to increase HEPS by 10% despite turnover taking an 8% knock. The turnover dip was caused by timing differences on larger contracts, which makes sense in a group of this size. Due to the focus on margin mix and of course the timing differences as well, gross margin jumped from 47% to 55%. This is why profits went the right way in the end.

Another highlight is the share of profits from equity-accounted investment DataProof, which jumped by 25%. Cybersecurity is a very important growth area at the moment.

Shareholders will keep an eye on cash, which fell 25%. Although there are good reasons for it, one of the factors is a negative move in working capital that management explains as being due to timing differences. That’s an entirely plausible explanation, but still worth confirming at year-end.


The word “resilient” isn’t what Richemont shareholders want to see (JSE: CFR)

With flat sales, the share price fell 5% on the day

The luxury sector has been having a tricky time recently. Richemont could only manage flat sales in constant currency for the first six months of the year. As reported, sales came in 1% lower. Of course, when you dig deeper into the segments, you find much more variance. Asia Pacific dragged the team down with an 18% decline, while the Americas grew double digits and Japan managed 42%! Asia Pacific is just so big that the decline in that region was enough to offset all the growth elsewhere.

Another way to slice and dice the numbers is by looking at operating segments. Jewellery Maisons grew 2% and Specialist Watchmakers fell by 17%, so there’s quite the divergence there. The margins are also very different, with Jewellery Maisons at a 32.9% operating margin and Specialist Watchmakers at 9.7%.

Sales may have been “resilient” but the same can’t be said for operating margin from continuing operations, down a nasty 17% as operating margin contracted by 410 basis points to 21.9%. Cash flow generated from operating activities also showed exactly what shareholders don’t want to see: a drop of 25%.

The discontinued operation is YNAP and the non-cash write-down in that business has had a significant impact on earnings at Richemont. Discontinued operations contributed a loss of €1.3 billion this year vs. a loss of €655 million in the prior year. Although they will sell that business to Mytheresa, the pain may not be over yet – it’s a share-for-share deal, so if things keep getting worse, Richemont will just end up recognising losses on the Mytheresa stake instead.

In summary, HEPS fell by 21% and the share price is now down 3.7% year-to-date. That doesn’t tell the full story though, with a pretty serious double top in the middle of the year that shows how severely it has come off the 52-week highs:


The construction industry remains subdued, so read Sephaku’s numbers carefully (JSE: SEP)

You can’t extrapolate this growth in profits

Sephaku has released results for the six months to September. The underlying theme is one of little to no excitement in the construction industry, evidenced by a slight decline in group revenue. The story looks completely different for profitability though, with HEPS up from 7.54 cents to 13.78 cents – a jump of 83%!

How can this be? The answer lies in the SepCem profit contribution, which swung from a loss last year of R14 million to profit of R1.5 million. This is because EBIT margin in that business normalised at 4.8% in this period vs. just 1.1% in the comparable period due to supply and maintenance issues.

At Metier, the subsidiary within Sephaku, EBIT margin dipped by 40 basis points to 8.0% and profit came in slightly slower than last year at R36.5 million.

So, the important thing is to avoid interpreting the HEPS jump as an improvement in the construction sector. The narrative is one of subdued activity, with the HEPS increase due to the base effect of a highly problematic period last year rather than anything else.


Sales are down across The Foschini Group (JSE: TFG)

Yet the dividend is 6.7% higher

The Foschini Group certainly knows how to give shareholders something to smile about. Even though group revenue for the six months ended September was down 1.4%, gross profit was up 2.5% – and they point out that the R12.8 billion in gross profit is a record number. As a retailer should essentially be growing every single year due to inflation, each year should theoretically be a record! Still, it’s all about the narrative.

There’s so sign of any records further down the income statement, with operating income before finance costs down 3.4% and HEPS down 5.6%. Despite this, the group then gives shareholders another nugget of happiness: an increase in the dividend of 6.7%.

The third bone thrown to shareholders comes in the form of recent improvements in sales. Group sales were down 3.5% for the first 21 weeks and ended 2% lower for the 26 weeks, so there’s been a significant improvement across the group since September. In the last 5 weeks of the period, sales in TFG Africa were up a meaty 8.3%. TFG London grew 0.3% in those 5 weeks and TFG Australia was 0.1% lower. Along with the dividend increase, I suspect that this is why the share price closed 5% higher.

It’s interesting to note that they are more fully stocked than this time last year, with inventory up 7.5% despite lower sales. This is due to port delays in the comparable period that impacted stock levels at TFG Africa, so things seem to have normalised.

Within TFG Africa, clothing sales fell 1% year-on-year. Although the Chinese competition in the market must be playing a role here, they also had a lot of clearance activity in the comparable period. This explains why gross margins increased this year but sales growth was negative, as clearance sales in the base period would boost sales and punish gross margin.

Special mention must go to Bash, the online platform that grew sales 47.9%. It now contributes 5.6% of TFG Africa’s sales.

Looking abroad, TFG London is in trouble. Sales fell 8.2% in GBP and gross profit was down 3.1%, with some of the pain at least offset by a focus on gross margin. In TFG Australia, they are also complaining about consumer pressures as sales fell 2.4% in AUD. Again, the focus is firmly on gross margin.

Despite the challenges overseas, TFG is moving ahead with the acquisition of a business called White Stuff in the UK. Shareholders would love to see some green stuff, particularly in the column showing the percentage change year-on-year for offshore sales!


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • The largest shareholder in Exemplar REITail (JSE: EXP) will be unbundling 10,000,000 Exemplar shares to its own shareholders. Whilst this doesn’t immediately change the ultimate beneficial ownership of the shares, it could logically lead to some further trading in shares as they will now be more widely held. At the current price of R11.50 per share, that’s R115 million worth of shares. The market cap is R3.8 billion.
  • Eastern Platinum (JSE: EPS) released results for the third quarter. Revenue fell 49.5% and mine operating income swung from positive $8 million to a loss of $1 million. Attributable net loss was $3.4 million, with lower chrome sales in the quarter as the primary culprit. The focus remains on ramping up the Zandfontein underground section at the Crocodile River Mine.
  • Oasis Crescent (JSE: OAS) shareholders, pay attention. The fund is using a reinvestment alternative for distributions, except here’s the trick: the default choice is to reinvestment the distribution, not receive the cash. Here’s the second trick: the reinvestment price is R27.57 per unit, whereas the current traded price is R19.20. That’s because the reinvestment price is set at the NAV per unit. Usually, companies set the price with reference to the market price and make the cash distribution the default, so Oasis Crescent is being cheeky here.
  • Redefine (JSE: RDF) is taking the popular route of offering a dividend reinvestment alternative, which is basically like a miniature rights issue. For some reason, they are vague about the reinvestment price though. It will only be confirmed on 19 November. I tried to download the circular to see if they give more details in there, but alas the wrong PDF was uploaded to the Redefine website on that link. So, for now, I can’t tell you anything further. If you’re a shareholder, keep your eyes open for further announcements.
  • As the Initial Reserve Milestone (as defined in the prospectus) has been achieved, Southern Palladium (JSE: SDL) has issued 1,200,000 shares upon conversion of performance rights. The thing about junior mining is that dilution over time for shareholders is guaranteed.

We’re living longer… I think

For as long as human beings have existed, we’ve pondered whether we can make our existence last longer. With rumours swirling around that today’s 30-year-olds will be tomorrow’s centenarians, I did the research to see how much is fact and how much is fiction.

I was born in 1993, which means that I exist at the younger end of the Millennial spectrum (those born between 1981 and 1996, now aged between 28 and 43). If you believe what the life insurance salesmen have to say, then members of my generation are more likely than any generation before to reach 100 years of age.

Over the past few decades, life expectancy has seen a remarkable leap across the globe. Back in 1960 (which is the earliest year that the UN started collecting global data) the average person could expect to live to a modest 52.5 years. Fast-forward to today, and that average has jumped to 72. In the UK, where they’ve been keeping records for much longer, the shift is even starker. In 1841, a British baby girl was expected to make it to just 42 years old, while a boy could hope for around 40. But by 2016, those numbers soared, with girls reaching an average of 83 and boys 79.

So, what’s the takeaway here? Thanks to the marvels of modern medicine and the power of public health, it looks as though we’re sticking around a lot longer than we once thought possible. But is it really the upward curve we think it is – and will it continue on that trajectory indefinitely?

Argument 1: Life expectancy is up

This rise in life expectancy stems from a mix of factors that came into play in the last century, like advances in public health, better nutrition, and modern medicine. Vaccinations and antibiotics slashed childhood mortality and prevented outbreaks of disease from turning into epidemics. Workplace safety standards improved, seatbelts became a thing and fewer people smoked. Heck, we even got rid of the asbestos in our ceilings and the lead plumbing in our kitchens. All of these changes addressed what we might call “preventable deaths”, i.e. deaths caused by external factors, paving the way for more people to age as nature intended.

By 2030, one in every six people worldwide will be aged 60 or over. That means the population of those 60 and older will grow from 1 billion in 2020 to a hefty 1.4 billion in the span of a decade. Fast forward to 2050, and this group will double, hitting 2.1 billion globally, with those aged 80 and above expected to triple to 426 million.

This shift towards an older population — known as population ageing — began in wealthier countries (like Japan, where 30% of the population is already over 60). But now it’s low- and middle-income countries seeing the biggest change. By 2050, nearly two-thirds of the world’s over-60 population will be living in these regions.

Argument 2: Life expectancy is the same

It might be time to acknowledge that the idea of our current super longevity is at least a little bit fueled by myths about our ancestors. Many of us believe that the ancient Greeks or Romans would have been astonished to see anyone living past middle age. But while medical advancements have indeed transformed healthcare, the assumption that our life span has skyrocketed is somewhat misleading.

What’s actually increased isn’t how long we can live but rather how many of us do live that long. Consider that life expectancy statistics usually reflect an average, which is heavily influenced by survival rates during infancy and childhood. Much of human history has seen high child mortality rates, and this reality skews average life expectancy strongly downward.

That’s why it’s commonly believed that people in ancient Greece or Rome lived to just 30 or 35. However, this doesn’t mean that adults simply dropped dead at 36; rather, high infant mortality brought down the average. In many ancient societies, a third of infants didn’t survive to their first birthday, and half of children didn’t reach age 10. For those who survived childhood, the odds improved sharply, with some living well into their 70s or beyond.

In truth, the maximum life span in ancient societies likely wasn’t drastically different from today. Age limits in Roman politics illustrate this beautifully: the cursus honorum – the structured path of political offices for ambitious young men – required a minimum age of 30 to stand for quaestor, the first official position. For the esteemed role of consul, however, the minimum age was set at 43.

So life may have been slightly shorter on average, lacking today’s medical interventions, but it was not dramatically so. A society can have a low average life expectancy due to infant mortality and maternal risks, yet still include individuals who live into their 80s or 90s.

This is why using averages (rather than other statistical measures like the median) is dangerous.

Argument 3: Life expectancy is capped

Using demographic survivorship metrics from national vital statistics in the eight countries with the longest-lived populations – Australia, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland – as well as Hong Kong and the United States, a recent study examined trends in death rates and life expectancy from 1990 to 2019. Their findings suggest that since 1990, gains in life expectancy have slowed across all of these regions.

It makes sense if you consider that we’re comparing this period to what came before. In the early twentieth century, advances in public health and medicine sparked a longevity revolution, marked by significant leaps in life expectancy at birth. While it previously took centuries to see just a one year increase in average life expectancy, the twentieth century saw a dramatic shift, with life expectancy rising by about three years per decade.

So, does that mean that life expectancy will just keep rising, as predicted? Not exactly. While we’ve done a great job of addressing the mortality risks that we can prevent, we neither fully understand nor know how to stop ageing from happening. Until we can do that, it seems very likely that our life expectancy will remain capped under 100 years of age.

The stats are fascinating: for female life expectancy to go up from 88 to 89 years in countries with long-lived populations, there would need to be a 20.3% drop in mortality across all ages and causes. For men, raising life expectancy from 82 to 83 years would require a 9.5% reduction in mortality at every age.

Between 1950 and 2019, the age at which people die has become more predictable in long-lived populations, with fewer people dying very young or very old. This trend has occurred even as life expectancy has gradually increased. Although it’s theoretically possible that more people could start living to even older ages, there’s no strong evidence for this yet. Radical increases in lifespan seem unlikely unless major progress is made in slowing the ageing process itself.

What does it all mean?

Well… I’m still not sure, actually. I guess it’s true that life expectancy is up across the twentieth century as a whole, but not really because we’re getting older; rather, because we’re not dying younger. More of us will get older, but older means 80s, not 100s. At the end of the day, only a few of us will live to be 100 or more. That’s not very different from what happened in ancient Rome, where Cicero’s wife Terentia lived to 103 and actress Lucceia performed on stage at 100.

At the heart of all this lies our fragile understanding of ageing, this curious side-effect of mortality that we hate and crave in equal measure. Until we figure out how to stall it – or even reverse it – we really have to question our desire to live longer. After all, where’s the fun in spending the final two decades of your life as an old person?

Unless, of course, you sell retirement products. Then life expectancy is a wonderful marketing tool.

About the author: Dominique Olivier

Dominique Olivier is the founder of human.writer, where she uses her love of storytelling and ideation to help brands solve problems.

She is a weekly columnist in Ghost Mail and collaborates with The Finance Ghost on Ghost Mail Weekender, a Sunday publication designed to help you be more interesting.

Dominique can be reached on LinkedIn here.

GHOST BITES (AngloGold | Gold Fields | Grindrod | Lesaka | MultiChoice | Sappi | Truworths)


AngloGold and Gold Fields are struggling to get approval for a joint venture in Ghana (JSE: ANG | JSE: GFI)

And separately, AngloGold released Q3 earnings

I’ll deal with the joint venture news first, which is that there is no news thanks to ongoing delays in getting approval for the proposed deal in Ghana. The plans for a joint venture between Gold Fields’ Tarkwa Mine and AngloGold’s Iduapriem Mine in Ghana were first announced more than 18 months ago. With national elections due to be held in Ghana in December, this deal certainly hangs in the balance.

Separately, AngloGold released earnings that remind us of just how good things are right now in the gold sector. With Q3 2024 as their strongest production quarter of the year thus far, the year-on-year jump in EBITDA is a rather ridiculous 339%! Free cash flow came in at $347 million vs. just $20 million in the base period.

The story comes through most strongly when you look at headline earnings, which swung from a loss of $194 million in Q3 2023 to positive $236 million in this period.

Q3 was a particularly strong swing, with the year-to-date numbers still showing great improvement in adjusted EBITDA from $846 million to $1.863 billion. Headline earnings on a year-to-date basis improved from a loss of $133 million to profit of $549 million.

So, although Q3 shows growth rates that reflect a poor base period, the year-to-date view is still an excellent show of strength for the company and the gold sector.


Grindrod’s great run of luck has taken a knock (JSE: GND)

Things are unstable in Mozambique

Grindrod’s investment in the Maputo port has been quite the fairytale, with Transnet as the Fairy Godmother dishing out wonderful sparkles for Grindrod shareholders who have enjoyed a rather crazy world in which companies are finding it easier to export some things via Maputo rather than South African ports.

Cue the ominous music and dark clouds in this story, as Mozambique is dealing with violence in the aftermath of its elections and the border with South Africa has been shut. Rail operations have also been suspended, so Grindrod’s port and terminal operations in Maputo and Matola have also been suspended for now.

The share price dropped 4% on the news. The market is regularly reminded of the risks of seeking growth beyond our borders in Africa.


Lesaka’s first quarter hits the mid-point of guidance for revenue and adjusted EBITDA (JSE: LSK)

This is the ninth successive quarter of delivering adjusted EBITDA guidance

Lesaka is one of the few examples you can find on our local market of a genuine tech start-up. This means a focus on building out platforms and developing the business through smart partnerships, all while working towards that magical inflection point for profitability when red suddenly turns to green and the cash starts flowing.

For now, Lesaka is still making operating losses, although I must point out that the latest quarter included $1.7 million worth of transaction costs for the Adumo acquisition. Without that, the loss of $0.05 million would obviously look a lot better.

Rather than the profits, the one thing I would highlight as a concern is the flat revenue in the Merchant Division. High growth stories need high growth to be justified! The Consumer Division is carrying the full burden right now, with revenue up 30%. Group revenue growth for the quarter was just 7%.

The mid-point of FY25 revenue guidance implies 35% year-on-year growth. Although that seems like a stretch after this quarter, the Adumo acquisition is going to play a major role here and it only closed in October.


The Canal+ deal can’t close quickly enough at MultiChoice (JSE: MCG)

The underlying business is bleeding

MultiChoice has released an interim trading statement that refers to current conditions as the most challenging environment in the group’s history. They find themselves in a difficult spot, navigating African currency issues and a deep, dark hole of investment at Showmax to try build a profitable streaming business. All of this is happening while the core business is coming under increasing threat from the streamers that got there first, like Netflix. At this point, I think the Springboks may well be single-handedly carrying the business thanks to Supersport!

Despite efforts to put through inflationary increases and cut costs, the headline loss per share has gotten a lot worse. It has deteriorated by between 45% and 49%.

MultiChoice then discloses a bunch of other metrics that they would prefer you to use, like “organic trading profit” (a -3% to +1% move) or “organic trading profit excluding Showmax” which increased by between 30% and 34%.

You could also consider adjusted core HEPS, which is expected to be roughly breakeven. This excludes the extensive forex losses on cash remittances from Africa.

If all goes ahead in the Canal+ deal, this will hopefully become their problem to solve. If that deal gets blocked, then I’m genuinely not sure how MultiChoice will manage to fund their Showmax ambitions.


Sappi finishes the year strong (JSE: SAP)

But it wasn’t enough to save the full-year result

Sappi has released fourth quarter and full-year results. Q4 did its very best to improve a tough year, with sales up 6% and adjusted EBITDA up 35%. When you compare it to the full-year result of both sales and adjusted EBITDA down 6%, you realise just how much things improved at the end of the year.

The story is one of better performance in South Africa (especially in pulp) vs. Europe, with Sappi having incurred $158 million in costs to restructure and close European assets. This contributed to the substantial increase in net debt over the 12 months from $1.1 billion to $1.4 billion.

It’s extremely difficult to try and figure out how Sappi might perform in future, as the cyclical nature of the business is made even trickier by how different the underlying paper markets are. The clear theme coming through is that Europe is taking longer than expected to improve, with demand in South Africa and North America currently dominating the story. Still, they expect EBITDA for Q1 2025 to be significantly higher than last year, so the Q4 2024 momentum should continue.


Truworths Africa is in trouble (JSE: TRU)

The share price fell 6% as the market noted the lack of growth

Truworths is not exactly the most innovative retailer around, let’s face it. This is coming through in the performance, with Truworths Africa reporting a very sad sales increase of just 0.2% for the 18 weeks to 3 November. This looks particularly rough vs. the Office UK business, which posted growth of 9.7% in constant currency i.e. that’s not thanks to the rand, for once. In fact, due to rand strength, the growth rate is only 8.1% when translated to rand!

The net impact is that Truworths group sales were up just 2.8% in rand. The company has laid the blame at the door of trading conditions in South Africa. I would wait to see how other retailers are doing before accepting that story at face value. I can’t that Truworths is doing much to improve its competitive positioning.

The bright spot at Truworths Africa is online sales, up 38% and now contributing 6.4% of the segment’s sales. Over at Office, the bright spot is in-store sales, with plans to increase trading space by 10% in the 2025 financial year. Online sales only grew by 3.2% at Office, but that’s a far more mature market for online in which 42.9% of total sales at Office are through online channels.


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • An associate of PJ Mouton bought shares in Curro (JSE: COH) worth over R15 million.
    • A senior executive of Gemfields (JSE: GML) exercised share options and then sold all the shares received for R2.4 million.
    • The CEO of Rainbow Chicken (JSE: RCL) bought shares in the company worth nearly R192k.
  • DRA Global (JSE: DRA) is the next name to be leaving the JSE, with a planned delisting date in early January after shareholders approved the buyback structure that creates a liquidity window prior to the delisting.
  • Bringing to an end many years of legal battles, the court in Brazil has ratified the BHP (JSE: BHG) settlement related to the Samarco dam disaster. The final settlement was $31.7 million, of which BHP is on the hook for half. As I noted when the settlement terms were first announced, the current BHP provision is adequate for this, thanks to the amount spent thus far and the time value of money on the settlement.
  • Equites Property Fund (JSE: EQU) announced that the Basingstoke and Dean Borough Council has granted full planning permission for the development of bulk at Oakdown Farm. There are a number of conditions to be met within the next year, which Equites sounds confident of meeting. This significantly improves the fair value of the property, but Equites carries it at historical cost plus capitalised interest. They therefore won’t recognise the fair value increase, but will continue to capitalise interest. Also be aware that if they sell the property, it would not be included in Equites’ distributable earnings.
  • Kore Potash (JSE: KP2) has issued a trading halt pending the all-important announcement on the EPC contract. This is to avoid any information being leaked into the market and acted upon before being announced. The weird thing is that the halt is only on the ASX and JSE, not the AIM in London!
  • Hammerson (JSE: HMN) has acquired the remaining 50% stake in Westquay, a high quality shopping mall in Southampton in the UK.
  • Jubilee Metals (JSE: JBL) has released a quarterly operational update. It was an important period for them, with plenty of progress made on the Zambian copper strategy in particular. They also achieved a significant uptick in chrome and PGM production in South Africa.
  • Visual International (JSE: VIS) is trying to fix its balance sheet by capitalising a number of loans held by related parties through issuing shares as settlement. The good news for other shareholders is that the shares are being issued at a 25.1% premium to the 30-day VWAP. The other good news is that settling the roughly R29 million in debt will restore the company to a positive net asset value position.
  • African Dawn Capital (JSE: ADW) announced that the suspension of trading on its shares has been lifted.
  • In case you’ve been wondering, there’s still a lot of legal fighting at Tongaat Hulett (JSE: TON). The latest is that an urgent application has been filed in court by RGS Group to try and stop the business rescue plan from being implemented with the Vision consortium.

Who’s doing what this week in the South African M&A space?

0

African Infrastructure Investment Managers (Old Mutual) has exited its investment in Bakwena Platinum Corridor Concession. The 12.67% stake, held through its African Infrastructure Investment Fund 2, has been acquired by Gaia Fund Managers, a specialist asset manager focused on Africa’s emerging infrastructure asset class. Financial details were undisclosed.

Nampak has entered into a binding agreement to dispose of its industrial inkjet printing, laser marketing and case coding solutions business known as Nampak I&CS for a disposal consideration of R142,5 million.

Hammerson plc has completed the acquisition of the remaining 50% stake in Westquay in Southampton, UK for £135 million. The consideration will be funded from the proceeds (€705 million) received from the company’s recent disposal of its 42% stake in Value Retail.

Pan African Resources (PAR) is to acquire the remaining 92% shareholding in Tennant Consolidated Mining Group. PAR acquired an initial 8% in March for US$3,4 million and will acquire the rest of the group for $50,8 million in a share-swap transaction which will see an issue of new shares. The new shares constitute less than 6% of its issued share capital. This acquisition aims to boost PAR’s production growth in Australia’s Northern Territory, with plans for a significant processing facility and exploration potential. The initial development capital for Tennant’s Nobles Gold Project is $35,7 million, which will be fully funded using Australian debt facilities. The plant is expected to be commissioned during June 2025 and first gold by July 2025. The initial capital investment is expected to be repaid in less than three years at an average gold price of c.$2,600 an ounce.

Sirius Real Estate is to acquire a £9,05 million multi-let light industrial park in Carnforth, Lancashire representing an 11.4% net initial yield including acquisition costs. The acquisition adds 172,152 square feet of light industrial space to the UK portfolio. In addition, Sirius has completed the €3 million acquisition of a nine-acre strategic land parcel adjacent to its Oberhausen multi-use business park in the Ruhr area of northwest Germany which will provide the opportunity to expand the park.

Anglo American has agreed to the sale of its 33.3% minority interest in the Jellinbah Group, a joint venture that owns a 70% stake in the Jellinbah East and the Lake Vermont steelmaking coal mine in Australia. The stake is being sold to Zashvin, an existing 33.3% shareholder, for cash proceeds of A$1,6 billion.

As part of its ongoing strategy to focus on its mining and chemical businesses and the optimisation of its portfolio, AECI has disposed of Much Asphalt to a consortium comprising Old Mutual Private Equity’s OMPE VI GP (Old Mutual) and Sphere Investments, a Black investment holding company. The estimated disposal consideration of R1,1 billion has been structured as a ‘locked-box’ structure with an effective date of 31 December 2024.

Diversified financial services group Clientèle, has acquired Emerald Life, a life micro-insurer with an established footprint nationwide, for c.R597,5 million. The acquisition will add to the group’s expertise in the mass market segment. The Embedded Value of Emerald Life is c. R600 million. The deal constitutes a category 2 transaction and does not require shareholder approval.

The implementation conditions associated with the disposal by Sasfin Bank of its capital equipment finance and commercial property finance businesses to African Bank have, as of 31 October 2024, been met. The deal was first announced in October 2023 for a disposal consideration of R3,26 billion.

Sabvest Capital’s disposal of its direct and indirect interests in Rolfes, announced in August 2024 for R179,5 million, has received all regulatory approvals and is now unconditional.

The disposal by Transaction Capital of Nutun Transact, Accsys and Nutun Credit Health to Q Link (SPE Mid-Market Fund I Partnership), announced in August 2024, is now unconditional. The deal, a category 2 transaction, was valued at R410 million.

Mpact’s disposal of its Versapak division to Greenpath Recycling (a subsidiary of Sinica Manufacturing) for R254,7 million, announced in August 2024, has become unconditional with effect 4 November 2024.

The Competition Commission has approved the acquisition by Novus from Media24 (Naspers) of three divisions, namely On the Dot – the media supply chain management division, Community Newspapers – the local news portfolio and Soccer Laduma and Kick Off – the football publication division. The purchase consideration was not disclosed but is reported to represent c.1.6% (c.R43 million) of Novus’ market capitalisation.

The proposed joint venture between AngloGold Ashanti and Gold Fields, announced in March 2023, is still to receive the requisite approvals from the Government of Ghana. The joint venture aims to combine Gold Fields’ Tarkwa Mine and AngloGold Ashanti’s Iduapriem Mine into a single managed entity. This would extend life of mine, increase production and lower costs. In the absence of approvals, the mining houses will separately continue to improve their respective assets while maintaining engagement in relation to a potential asset combination.

Weekly corporate finance activity by SA exchange-listed companies

0

Shareholders of DRA Global, the JSE- and ASX-listed multi-disciplinary consulting and engineering group focused on the mining and minerals resources sector, this week voted in favour of delisting the company. Accordingly, DRA Global will proceed with an off-market equal access share buy-back of up to 11,088,080 shares at R24.55 per share for an aggregate R271,45 million. Those still holding shares after the 20% take-up will, when the company delists, remain shareholders of an unlisted entity. The buy-back will commence on 26 November and close on 12 December 2024. The company’s listing on the JSE will terminate on 6 January 2025.

Potash development company, Kore Potash plc, has successfully completed a share subscription fundraise of US$900,000 through the issue of 25,441,268 new ordinary shares at 2.76 pence per share representing a 15% discount to the closing price on 1 November 2024. Admission of the new shares is expected to take place on 18 November. The net proceeds of the fundraise will be used to further advance the work that is expected to lead to the signing of the Engineering Procurement and Construction contract for the Kola Potash Project and to provide working capital for Kore Potash.

Shareholders of Fortress Real Estate Investments holding 75.94% of Fortress B shares in issue, elected the dividend in specie option whereby shareholders could opt to receive NEPI Rockcastle (NRP) shares in lieu of a cash dividend. A transfer of 6,054,285 NRP shares will be made retaining R641,9 million of cash not utilised to pay the cash dividend.

Zeder Investments has declared a special dividend of 20 cents per share resulting in the payment of an aggregate R308 million to shareholders. This follows the disposal of two primary farming production units, TWK and Applethwaite by Zeder Financial Services’ 87.1%-held Zeder Pome Investments and Capespan Agric.

CA Sales has, as partial settlement of its R37,5 million acquisition of the remaining shares in Mac Marketing Communications (Mauritius) and Mac Investments, issued 1,524,971 new CA&S shares.

Following the results of the scrip dividend election, Equites Property Fund will issue 25,598,068 ordinary shares in the company in lieu of an interim dividend, resulting in a capitalisation of the distributable retained profits in the company of R358,38 million.

Visual International has convinced related and non-related parties to subscribe for shares in Visual at 4 cents per share to extinguish the liabilities of the company. Visual will issue up to 746,992,210 shares, restoring the positive net asset value of the company. At the AGM to be held on 22 November 2024, shareholders will be asked to vote on increasing the authorise share of the company from 1 billion to 5 billion shares. A circular will be distributed during November.

The JSE has notified shareholders of AH-Vest that the listing of the company has been annotated with RE to indicate its failure to submit annual reports timeously and, as such, may be suspended if not submitted before 30 November 2024.

The JSE has approved the transfer of the listings of enX and Huge Group to the General Segment of Main Board lists with effect from commencement of trade on 8 November 2024. The listing requirements in this segment are less onerous for the smaller cap firms.

African Dawn Capital, suspended in July by the JSE due to its inability to meet the required deadline to publish its audited annual financial statements for the year ended 29 February 2024, has had its suspension lifted, following the release of the company’s annual report.

Hammerson plc continued with its programme to purchase its ordinary shares up to a maximum consideration of £140 million. The sole purpose of the buyback programme is to reduce the company’s share capital. This week the company repurchased 755,225 shares at an average price per share of 293 pence per share.

South32 announced in its annual financial statements released in August that it would increase its capital management programme by US$200 million, to be returned via an on-market share buy-back. This week 1,059,973 shares were repurchased at an aggregate cost of A$3,92 million.

In line with its share buyback programme announced in March, British American Tobacco this week repurchased a further 467,029 shares at an average price of £27.16 per share for an aggregate £12,68 million.

Prosus and Naspers continued with their open-ended share repurchase programmes. During the period 28 October to 1 November 2024, a further 3,714,714 Prosus shares were repurchased for an aggregate €146,41 million and a further 288,872 Naspers shares for a total consideration of R1,2 billion.

One company issued a profit warning this week: Murray & Roberts.

During the week, five companies issued cautionary notices: Accelerate Property Fund, Clientèle, Vukile Property Fund, Murray & Roberts and Cilo Cybin.

Who’s doing what in the African M&A and debt financing space?

0

Lagos-headquartered Beacon Power Services (BPS) has announced the closing of an undisclosed Series A financing round. The round was led by Partech and included participation by Finnfund, Gaia Impact and Proparco, along with previous investors Kaleo Ventures and Seedstars Africa Ventures, amongst others. BPS provides African utilities with data-driven solutions to manage the power grid, which are specifically designed to meet the unique needs of the continent’s power industry.

Proparco has renewed its partnership with NMB Bank through a commitment to a US$25 million facility package which includes a $15 million senior credit facility, a $5 million EURIZ portfolio guarantee plus a $5 million Trade Finance Guarantee. The funding will allow NMB to expand financing for exporters, agricultural SMEs and women in Zimbabwe.

Proparco has also announced a €5 million EURIZ facility for Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe to support long term finance for local Zimbabwean farmers.

Ghana’s Tendo Technologies, an online retail platform that empowers entrepreneurs, has announced the strategic acquisition of Shopa for an undisclosed sum. Shopa, which will be rebranded as Tendo Retail, provides commerce solutions to informal retailers across the West African country.

UK energy revenue management firm, SteamaCo, has merged with Nigerian digital energy solutions company, Shyft Power Solutions. Alongside the merger, there was also new funding round led by Equator VC and including Praetura Ventures and KawiSafi Ventures. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Kenyan edtech, Eneza Education has merged with Pakistan’s Knowledge Platform. The merged entity which will be headquartered in Singapore and operates as Knowledge Platform, will serve over 1,000,000 learners in Asia and Africa using mobile, web and SMS technologies.

IG MARKETS PODCAST: The Trader’s Handbook Ep10 – trading commodities: insights into gold, oil and market dynamics

In this episode of The Trader’s Handbook, Shaun Murison from IG Markets South Africa joined me to explore the world of commodity trading.

We discussed the nuances of trading popular commodities like gold and oil, comparing direct commodity trading to investing in mining stocks, and delved into the unique appeal and risks associated with each.

Listeners will also learn about key trading patterns, including double tops and double bottoms, and how technical analysis can guide market decisions. Tune in for insights that blend strategic knowledge with practical trading tips.

Listen to the episode below and enjoy the full transcript for reference purposes:


Transcript

The Finance Ghost: Welcome to Episode 10 of the Trader’s Handbook, featuring your host, the Finance Ghost as usual, and Shaun Murison of IG Markets South Africa. This is coming to you shortly after Halloween, which is always an exciting time for a ghost. You may have gotten some great outfits out and maybe had some scares here or there. Hopefully the market hasn’t been dishing out some scares along the way – it does tend to be quite good at that! Of course, there are many different ways to play the market and to have the good times and the not so good times that come with it, and hopefully more good times than bad.

Last week we covered forex, so there’s a good example of something you can trade on the markets outside of what might be your comfort zone. For example, certainly speaking for myself, I’ve come at this series of podcasts having historically only played around in equities. So forex is something quite new in that regard.

This week we are going to do something different as well, so I’m really looking forward to that. We are doing commodities and that of course is another very important asset class. I guess gold is always the one that springs to mind. For me, when someone says commodities, it’s amazing how that just sticks, that’s just the one that I think about. I guess we all have that one thing, but unlike in forex, you can actually choose to buy the commodity. You can choose to buy the companies that are mining those commodities. I’ve been a bit closer to commodities than I have to forex in my equities journey because it’s quite hard to find a company that specialises in forex, but you can find a whole lot of them that specialise in commodities.

Of course, what we’re talking about this week, Shaun, is the actual commodities. So let me welcome you to the show and perhaps just start there with a question around why traders might be interested in the gold itself or whatever other commodity rather than the gold miners on the equity markets?

Shaun Murison: Great. I think when you’re trading gold, it maybe just appears a little bit more simple because you’re actually trading the product. If you start dealing with a mining company, for example, let’s use gold as the example, if you’re looking at a mining company, you’re worried about all sorts of labour action, management, operational efficiencies, weather – there’s lots that can go wrong with the earnings of a company, things that can affect that share price.

When you look at the commodity, you’re not worried about the corporate around that product. You might be looking at companies in terms of what production is, how much gold is coming into the market, for example. This is seen as just a simpler way of trading the commodity. You want direct exposure to a commodity rather than just the business. With that, though, generally you forego yield. With companies who pay dividends, you’ll get a yield. Obviously with a commodity like gold, you’re just looking at trading the price and benefitting from that price movement.

If there’s a shortage of supply of gold, expect the price to rise. Then you’ll be taking long positions and hoping to benefit from the price. You’re not worried about what’s actually wrong with a business, the underlying businesses that produce that product themselves. And when you start looking at things like these very liquid commodities, gold is a huge, huge commodity. When you start looking at exchanges, I think it’s somewhere around $160 to $200 billion in gold that’s traded through the exchange on a daily basis. And as a basis of comparison, if you look at volume that’s traded through the Johannesburg Stock Exchange over the course of the week, you’re looking at about maybe R110 billion. It’s considerably bigger market, a lot more liquid, which makes it easier to get in and out of positions. And then I know we’ll talk about costs a little bit later, but your costs to trade those types of products is a lot less.

The Finance Ghost: Like everything in the markets, actually, it comes down to risk and reward, right? You forego the dividend, but I think that the mining companies can dish out some pretty big hidings on the market because bad news does happen. And what’s interesting is these mining companies, especially the gold miners, there’s no huge positive surprises. People know what the projects are. It’s not like they announced some amazing gold rush. You know, hey, we found a whole lot of gold that no one knew about. That’s just not how it works, whereas the downside risks are always possible. There’s been some kind of geological event or labour action to your point, or weather or something else. I feel like it’s always a risk on the miners that you can have a really, really bad day, whereas on a good day it’s going to be driven by the commodity price and you can pick that up by buying the commodity anyway. A bad day, yes, will be driven by the commodity price, but can also be driven by company-specific events. When you are trading on leverage, I guess that’s the problem, right?

Shaun Murison: Again, that double-edged sword. When you’re looking at those companies, the leverage is less, but the volatility is more, so the likelihood of a large percentage move range of movement during the course of a day on a share is more likely than you’re going to see on the underlying commodities price, like a gold price, for example. But then again, when you’re trading the commodity like gold, that leverage is higher so your profits and losses are magnified by more. It’s a bit of a give and take when you’re trading between the two products.

The Finance Ghost: So you’ve touched on the point there, which is the amount of leverage and it’s something we talked about on the forex show as well. Is it the same story with commodities? You can have more leverage when you’re trading commodities than when you are trading equities?

Shaun Murison: Yes. It varies depending on what commodity you’re trading, but it’s generally up to 30 times leverage. Whereas with equities, when you’re trading equities at CFDs, you’re looking at about 10 times leverage as a maximum, sometimes less.

The Finance Ghost: And I’m guessing it’s the more popular commodities where you can have more leverage, right? Because it’s a deeper market?

Shaun Murison: Yeah, a deeper market that’s a lot more liquid and so a lot more transactions going through.

The Finance Ghost: So let’s maybe touch on some of these popular commodities because as I say, gold is the first one that came to my mind. It was actually quite cool, I recently held some Krugerrands that belong to a friend of mine. It’s such a silly thing, there’s no reason why it should be cool, actually. But you’re holding something in your hand that is worth a lot of money. I don’t know if it’s the colour of the damn gold or what it is, but there’s a reason why in all the mythology gold has been a big feature – the treasure chest of gold and people stealing pirate ships to go get it and all the stories of dragons and everything else. Gold clearly is something people like. I don’t know what happens to us when we look at lots of it in a specific place, but it’s a bit different when you’re trading it on a screen, obviously, and probably for the better. You don’t get to see the beautiful yellow stuff in your hand. Is gold still the most popular of the commodities in terms of traders? I think oil would surely be right up there. What are the sort of most popular commodities for people to trade?

Shaun Murison: So gold and oil do rank amongst the top. If you look at production value in the underlying market, something like oil is actually far bigger than like the top 10 metal markets combined. But remember, there’s different types of oil products to trade, so it does get fragmented in terms of trading value. With a broker like IG, obviously I can’t speak for other brokers, but I would imagine it’d be quite similar. It’s neck and neck, you know, on a weekly basis.

If you look at oil and generally the US, crude oil seems to be the most popular. US and gold, they rank probably about 5 and 6 in terms of most popular traded products with us. There are a lot of other commodities that do have quite a lot of appetite with traders at IG. So if we look at the broad commodity spectrum, what we would offer is divided into categories.

We have energies – your oil, natural gas, gasoline. Then you’ve got your precious metals like gold, silver, palladium, platinum, and then you’ve got your base metals, your copper, zinc, iron ore, things like that.

In terms of those groups, energies, probably the most popular, that’s your natural gas, very, very popular product to trade. Crude as well.

Within the precious metals, gold and silver, as you might expect at the top, there’s been a lot of appetite for palladium. Obviously a major producer of palladium is Russia and we know what’s been going on there

And then the base metals, probably not as popular as those products, but still quite traded, predominantly your copper.

I didn’t actually mention the other one, which is, I think quite interesting, is the soft commodities. A lot of the stuff that is farmed and there, what you find a lot of interest in is coffee – coffee and cocoa.

The Finance Ghost: Got to hedge that morning cup, hey? Long coffee in your portfolio and short coffee in your cupboard as you use it up!

Let’s maybe touch on some of those different underlying categories of commodities because they all have different drivers, right? Gold is typically seen as the safe-haven play, although honestly I gave up a couple of years ago trying to really understand what moves the gold price. It’s not always high inflation because sometimes it depends on the yield you can get on Treasuries at the time, it’s a very complicated animal, but gold seems to have that sort of safe-haven flavour to it.

Oil seems to move with geopolitics and obviously demand as well. People forget how much demand can change for oil. You think, well, I have to drive somewhere. Actually you don’t always, if it’s expensive to go somewhere or it’s expensive to transport something, you just might not do it. It doesn’t always mean that it’s your home to work drive or home to school, especially at industrial level where the big users of oil can pare back or whatever the case may be. So there’s a lot of sort of economic activity in oil, whereas that isn’t really in gold, which is jewellery and some other stuff, but that’s not really what’s driving it. It’s stuff like central banks buying it, etc.

The base metals, those are also economic activity, right? Copper is seen as that kind of thing where traders are reading the news, they’re not reading a set of company accounts because that would be equities. Instead, they’re focusing on geopolitics and inflation and GDP releases as the drivers of commodities.

Shaun Murison: Yeah, it really just depends on what sort of commodities you’re talking about. Obviously geopolitical risk has been a big factor. We’ve got ongoing wars which affect oil. Then you have your OPEC+, your Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and Russia controlling prices. You’re looking at announcements there and demand.

When you start looking at your base metals, most of the consumption is in China, so we’re looking at the health of China. There’s obviously a lot to consider and there are lots of different products to trade.

When you look at gold, you’re looking at safe-haven appeal. Is it a hedge against inflation?

A lot of these products do obviously look at the dollar as well, so the dollar might be a consideration when you’re trading these products. Generally, a weaker dollar makes these products cheaper in other currencies.

You’re looking at soft commodities, you might be looking at weather, crops, but at the end of the day, as a technical trader, I always think that good technical analysis reflects the underlying fundamentals or macro is that it’s absorbing all that information and then it’s reflecting it in the price. That’s the great thing about looking at charting, is it’s just mathematical formulae that are absorbing every little bit of rational investment, irrational investment, sentiment and then spitting out a result.

We just look to in the short-term trade those results, trade that trend that emerges from all those factors out there. So not to oversimplify things, but that is the beauty for me about charting is that we can look at that to digest that information and help us assess direction and hopefully join that direction.

The Finance Ghost: And in terms of what we’re actually trading here, even though it’s commodities, is it still a CFD like we’ve seen in the other instruments on the IG platform? Because I’m aware there are lots of different ways to trade commodities, as futures, for example. But some of this is for large industrial players looking to hedge exposure, etc. Commodities are a very real-world thing I guess, much like forex, companies are trading in this stuff all the time. Traders looking to speculate and make a profit are almost playing on the fringes of some of these flows. The primary flows are quite industrial in nature.

Shaun Murison: Okay, firstly, everything that we offer is a type of CFD. The CFD is just a Contract For Difference and it’s a contract for the difference in price. It can be based on anything. I don’t want to over complicate things, but obviously we do have futures contracts, but it’s a type of CFD with us. You’re still trading the price and you want to buy at a lower price than you sell that futures contract. Where the CFD is different is if you’re buying a share, you don’t actually have physical ownership of the share. You don’t have voting rights. If it is a futures product like oil, it’s just looking at a future price of oil relative to interest rates and fair value.

At the end of a futures contract, you might be able to take delivery of that product, whether it be oil or gold. With CFDs, you don’t actually own the underlying asset, you’re just looking to benefit from the price. It might look like it’s a futures contract or listed and it might reflect that futures price, but it’s still a type of CFD for everything that we do offer.

The Finance Ghost: And then, Shaun, in terms of the popularity of commodities versus forex, for example, on the platform – I think what I learned on the Forex show is that there really is a huge amount of activity in that space. Same story for the equity indices, actually more so than single stocks. I always have to switch off that side of my brain that is more fundamental. I want to go and read detailed financials and understand what’s going on. That’s not how trading really works. So, how does this stack up in terms of the popularity contest?

Shaun Murison: It does vary week by week. But I’d say that the most popular products traded with IG are indices, the major forex pairs – specifically the euro dollar – and then gold and oil. And in any week, what’s at top in terms of trading activity can change. That’s a very high ranking in terms of activity. I don’t know what the last count is, but we have so many instruments available for traders, over tens of thousands of actual instruments that traders can trade with IG. When you start looking at the top 10, that is very, very highly liquid, very, very heavily traded products.

The Finance Ghost: Shaun, last question on commodities, and this is obviously a really important one, this is something that we covered when we did forex, is just the costs of trading. How do the commodities stack up? Because that’s one of the big appeals of forex, right? The costs to trade are really, really, really low compared to a lot of other things. Where do commodities sit on that scale?

Shaun Murison: Again, it’s quite a broad suite, it does vary from product to product, but the structure of the cost is the same – that is, that there’s no commission. Trading commodities is generally seen as cheaper than trading shares or equities as CFDs.

It sits in the realm somewhere between indices and forex. I think when you start looking at gold in particular, it can be as competitive as the forex market because that cost is just a spread. And remember, it’s because those markets are very, very highly liquid. A lot of trading activity and when there’s a lot of activity, generally you see the costs of those products are lower.

The Finance Ghost: Absolutely. Makes a world of sense. Charts here are going to be key, as they are in all trading activities. I think let’s maybe move on to that bit of the show where we do some interesting technical stuff. Again, as is always the case on the show, we’ll include a link in the show notes and maybe a chart or two from the excellent IG Markets Academy just showing some of these things. You really need to see them to understand them properly. So please go to the website, check out the show notes, go find the stuff. Go look on the IG Markets Academy, that’s actually where you should look. You should listen to this stuff and say, okay, that sounds interesting, let me go find that on the Academy and then go read it in detail.

Last week we did the head and shoulders pattern, which was a very interesting way of figuring out where a share price or any price might go. Actually, never mind a share price, it could be an index, it could be forex, it could be commodities, any of the above. Moving on from that this week, I think we can do something that I’ve seen play out quite often and I’ve used with reasonable success in equities, and that is specifically double tops. The inverse of that would be a double bottom. It’s much like head and shoulders, I guess, where there’s the “normal” one and then there’s the inverse one.

I’ll just hand over to you to run us through that, Shaun, double tops, double bottoms, what are they? I guess the name is a strong clue. And what do they potentially tell us?

Shaun Murison: Okay, so double tops and double bottoms, they are reversal patterns. The suggestion is that a price trend is changing direction. When you look at a double top, if you look at the price action, it takes a shape of the letter M. The suggestion is that it’s marking a top of a market before changing direction from up to down. We have a neckline, we wait for it to break below that neckline and we say, okay, well, that trend is reversing from an uptrend into a downtrend.

Inversely, when you start looking at a double bottom, it takes the shape, it’s a price pattern, whatever instrument you’re trading, it’s a pattern that takes the shape of a W and it’s suggesting that a market that has been in a downtrend is now moving into a new uptrend. So as the name implies, like you said, double top is suggesting at least a short term top in the market, be wary of possible downside to follow. And a double bottom is the suggestion of, maybe we’ve hit the bottom of that market and we could be setting up for a bit of a rally or change in trend from down to up.

Very similar in implication to that of the head and shoulders which we talked about previously. That’s obviously also a reversal pattern here and certainly something that I do look at. Certainly if I see a double top, if I’m long in the market, I see a double top, I might use that as a signal, maybe it’s about to turn, maybe I’m just going to get out of the market right now. If there’s other conviction, maybe I’m using other indicators with that, I might look at short positions and the market trades with the view that we expect that market to fall further.

Inversely with the double bottom, if I see that pattern and I was short in the market, I might be looking at exit my short position. If I had conviction, maybe using other technical indicators or other indications, I might use that double bottom as a suggested entry, long entry, a buy opportunity into that particular market.

The Finance Ghost: Yeah, Shaun, thanks for those insights into double tops and double bottoms. I haven’t used double bottoms too much, but I’ll look out for those a bit more. And double tops, as I say, I’ve had some really good successes with that in the equity space, so not surprising that it translates really well into the other stuff as well.

Thank you as always for your time this week. I think it was another great show. To our listeners, go and check out the rest of the series. There’s a lot of really great stuff to help you learn all about trading and most importantly, go and open the demo account because that is the number one way to go and learn. Rather go and make the mistakes with Monopoly money. Rather go and figure out how the system works without your real money in there just yet. And then when you feel confident, you have the ability to then fund your account if you so choose and you can get started on your trading journey. Sean, thank you so much. I look forward to doing the next one with you in a couple of weeks. And yeah, all the best for a trading week ahead.

Shaun Murison: Thank you very much. Great being here.

Verified by MonsterInsights